Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer
- 1k Downloads
The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual uses tumor size, lymph node, and metastatic status to stage breast cancer across different subtypes. We examined the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC within the same stages and sub-stages to evaluate whether TNBC had worse prognosis than non-TNBC.
We reviewed the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data and identified 158,358 patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2012. The overall survival (OS) time and breast cancer cause-specific survival time were compared between patients with TNBC and non-TNBC in each stage and sub-stages. The results were validated using a dataset of 2049 patients with longer follow-up from our institution.
Compared with patients with non-TNBC, patients with TNBC had worse OS and breast cancer cause-specific survival time in every stage and sub-stage in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, tumor grade, and surgery and radiation treatments in the SEER data. The worse OS time in patients with TNBC was validated in our institutional dataset.
Patients with TNBC have worse survival than patients with non-TNBC. The new AJCC staging manual should consider breast cancer biomarker information.
KeywordsTriple-negative breast cancer TNBC Prognosis Overall survival Cause-specific survival AJCC Cancer staging
Conception and design: XL, LP, LH, JLM. Analysis and interpretation of data: All authors. Manuscript drafting and reviewing: All authors. XL is responsible for the overall content.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Timms KM, Liu S, Chen H, Litton JK, Potter J, Lanchbury JS, Stemke-Hale K, Hennessy BT, Arun BK et al (2011) Incidence and outcome of BRCA mutations in unselected patients with triple receptor-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17(5):1082–1089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lin NU, Vanderplas A, Hughes ME, Theriault RL, Edge SB, Wong YN, Blayney DW, Niland JC, Winer EP, Weeks JC (2012) Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple-negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer 118(22):5463–5472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Edge SB (2010) American Joint Committee on cancer: AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Yi M, Mittendorf EA, Cormier JN, Buchholz TA, Bilimoria K, Sahin AA, Hortobagyi GN, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Luo S, Buzdar AU et al (2011) Novel staging system for predicting disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with surgery as the first intervention: time to modify the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Clin Oncol 29(35):4654–4661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong JH, Sledge G, Geyer CE Jr, Martino S, Rastogi P, Gralow J, Swain SM et al (2014) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J Clin Oncol 32(33):3744–3752CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Pan HC, Taylor C, Wang YC et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Creighton CJ, Li X, Landis M, Dixon JM, Neumeister VM, Sjolund A, Rimm DL, Wong H, Rodriguez A, Herschkowitz JI et al (2009) Residual breast cancers after conventional therapy display mesenchymal as well as tumor-initiating features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(33):13820–13825CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar