Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SOLTI NeoPARP: a phase II randomized study of two schedules of iniparib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iniparib is an investigational agent with antitumor activity of controversial mechanism of action. Two previous trials in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin showed some evidence of efficacy that was not confirmed. This phase II randomized neoadjuvant study was designed to explore its activity and tolerability with weekly paclitaxel (PTX) as neoadjuvant treatment in TNBC patients. 141 patients with Stage II–IIIA TNBC were randomly assigned to receive PTX (80 mg/m2, d1; n = 47) alone or in combination with iniparib, either once-weekly (PWI) (11.2 mg/kg, d1; n = 46) or twice-weekly (PTI) (5.6 mg/kg, d1, 4; n = 48) for 12 weeks. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast. pCR rate was similar among the three arms (21, 22, and 19 % for PTX, PWI, and PTI, respectively). Secondary efficacy endpoints were comparable: pCR in breast and axilla (21, 17, and 19 %); best overall response in the breast (60, 61, and 63 %); and breast conservation rate (53, 54, and 50 %). Slightly more patients in the PTI arm presented grade 3/4 neutropenia (4, 0, and 10 %). Grade 1/2 (28, 22, and 29 %), but no grade 3/4 neuropathy, was observed. There were no differences in serious adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation among the three arms. Addition of iniparib to weekly PTX did not add relevant antitumor activity or toxicity. These results do not support further evaluation of the combination of iniparib at these doses plus paclitaxel in early TNBC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleere DW (2010) Triple-negative breast cancer: a clinical update. Commun Oncol 7:203–211. doi:10.1016/S1548-5315(11)70394-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384:164–172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel AG, De Lorenzo SB, Flatten KS et al (2012) Failure of iniparib to inhibit poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase in vitro. Clin Cancer Res 18:1655–1662. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2890

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu X, Shi Y, Maag DX et al (2012) Iniparib nonselectively modifies cysteine-containing proteins in tumor cells and is not a bona fide PARP inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 18:510–523. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Shaughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippen JE et al (2011) Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364:205–214. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1011418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Shaughnessy J, Schwartzberg L, Danso MA et al (2014) Phase III study of iniparib plus gemcitabine and carboplatin versus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:3840–3847. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ossovskaya V, Li L, Broude E et al (2009) Abstract #5552: BSI-201 enhances the activity of multiple classes of cytotoxic agents and irradiation in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 69:5552

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patel AG, Sarkaria JN, Kaufmann SH (2011) Nonhomologous end joining drives poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor lethality in homologous recombination-deficient cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3406–3411. doi:10.1073/pnas.1013715108

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ossovskaya V, Wang Y, Budoff A et al (2011) Exploring molecular pathways of triple-negative breast cancer. Genes Cancer 2:870–879. doi:10.1177/1947601911432496

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Esteva FJ, Franco SX, Hagan MK et al (2013) An open-label safety study of lapatinib plus trastuzumab plus paclitaxel in first-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 18:661–666. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0129

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rugo HS, Campone M, Amadori D et al (2013) A randomized, phase II, three-arm study of two schedules of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:411–419. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2552-8

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Green MC, Buzdar AU, Smith T et al (2005) Weekly paclitaxel improves pathologic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with paclitaxel once every 3 weeks. J Clin Oncol 23:5983–5992. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.06.232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly CM, Green MC, Broglio K et al (2012) Phase III trial evaluating weekly paclitaxel versus docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:930–935. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.36.2079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research US (2014) Guidance for industry: pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk early-stage breast cancer—Use as an endpoint to support accelerated approval

Download references

Funding

This work was fully supported by Sanofi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Llombart-Cussac.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Employment: EJC (Sanofi), IGR (Sanofi); Remuneration: ALC (Roche, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis), J. Balmaña (AstraZeneca), HR (Roche, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca), SGS (Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Teva, Eisai, Celgene); Stock ownership: ALC (MEDSIR ARO), EJC (Sanofi), IGR (Sanofi); Consultant/Advisory Role: ALC (Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer), CV (Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Novartis), SD (Novartis, Pfizer, Roche), J. Balmaña (AstraZeneca), SGS (AstraZeneca), JG (Novartis), NH (AstraZeneca); Funding: ALC (MEDSIR ARO, Celgene, Roche), SD (Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Puma, Amgen, AstraZeneca), J. Balmaña (AstraZeneca, Pharmamar), HR (Roche, Amgen, Pierre Fabre), NH (Biomarin), NRR (Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen). All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Clinical trial number: This trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01204125).

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Llombart-Cussac, A., Bermejo, B., Villanueva, C. et al. SOLTI NeoPARP: a phase II randomized study of two schedules of iniparib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 154, 351–357 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3616-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3616-8

Keywords

Navigation