Explicating perceived barriers to mammography for the USCREEN project: concerns about breast implants, faith violations, and perceived recommendations
- 255 Downloads
In line with the health belief model, perceived barriers have proven to be a key determinant of intentions to screen for breast cancer. The standard measure of perceived barriers to breast cancer screening is an 11 item scale developed by Victoria Champion. However, perceived barriers emerge and change over time, and Champion’s perceived barriers scale was last revised in 1999. Moreover, the original scale did not address barriers which may be more pronounced in particular populations, such as congruity of action with faith. As part of the Utah Screening Project, a sample of women 40–74 (N = 341, Mage = 51.19, SD = 8.11) were recruited from four Utah counties in 2014 to complete a survey. The results revealed that the four new perceived barrier items explained 6.4 % of intentions to screen, above and beyond other predictors. In addition to barriers identified in past research, the current study identified several novel barriers including (a) concerns about negative effects to breast implants, (b) perceived conflict with faith, and the (c) perception that mammography is no longer recommended. The new perceived barriers items are useful to researchers interested in exploring barriers not addressed by the original instrument. The barriers also suggest potential belief-based targets and channels (e.g., plastic surgery clinics, faith-based interventions) for delivering mammography interventions.
KeywordsPerceived barriers Health belief model Mammography Breast implants Faith News coverage
Jakob D. Jensen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication and the Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah. Chelsea Ratcliff, Jeremy Weaver, William Payton, and Sherrie Loewen are graduate students in the Department of Communication at the University of Utah. Melinda Krakow is a post-doctoral fellow at the National Cancer Institute. This research was funded by a grant from the Utah Department of Health.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. No author has a financial conflict or incentive related to or influenced by this research.
- 1.American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts and figures 2013–2014. American Cancer Society, Inc, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds.) (2013). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Retrieved from http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/
- 5.National Cancer Institute (2012) Cancer trends progress report: 2011/2012 update. Breast cancer screening [Internet] Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2012. [cited 2015 Feb 19]. Retrieved from: http://progressreport.cancer.gov/doc_detail.asp?pid=1&did=2011&chid=102&coid=1016&mid=
- 15.National Cancer Institute (2012) Directly Estimated 2012 BRFSS Data. State Cancer Profiles [Online]. Retrieved from: http://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov/quick-profiles/index.php?statename=utah#t=1. Accessed 20 Feb 2015
- 31.Sampson S (2011) Cosmetic surgery: is Utah still the vainest? Retrieved on 2 March 2015, from http://www.ksl.com/?sid=17790344