Abstract
Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and its derivatives are the most commonly performed autologous breast reconstruction procedures. These procedures were not recommended in the past for those who planned for subsequent childbearing because of the transposition of portions of the abdominal wall during the procedure into the anatomic position of the breast, implying possible adverse effects over the contour of these manipulated areas during pregnancy and delivery. We conducted a systematic review to assess the literature on esthetic or functional consequences of childbearing over the breast and abdomen after these procedures in patients that were affected by breast cancer. A comprehensive literature search in databases and citation indexes was conducted from February 2014 to April 2015. Any paper on pregnancy after breast reconstruction by TRAM or its derivatives and modifications, written in English or French, were included. The search results underwent a first screening to exclude duplicate and irrelevant papers. Full texts were then reviewed as to the criteria for inclusion, and data were extracted into data extraction forms from eligible papers. The initial search yielded 5132 articles. After screening and review, overall 17 papers met all criteria for inclusion in this review. Our work revealed that uneventful pregnancy and delivery can be anticipated in breast cancer survivors who had undergone breast reconstruction via TRAM or its derivatives with minor negative effects on either the breast or the abdomen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hunt Kk NL, Copeland III EM, Bland KL (2010) The breast. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, Pollock RE (eds) Schwartz’s principles of surgery, 9th edn. McGraw-Hill,New York, pp. 424–426
Schroeder M, Sugg S, Brooks J, Thomas A (2013) Abstract P2-18-12: surgical management of breast cancer: Breast conserving surgery or mastectomy in the 2010 SEER registries by hormone receptor and HER2 status. Cancer Res 73:P2-18-12-P12-18-12
Najafi M, Ebrahimi M, Kaviani A, Hashemi E, Montazeri A (2005) Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: cancer practice by general surgeons in Iran. BMC Cancer 5:35
Esmaili R, Saiidi JA, Majd HA, Esmaieli M (2010) A survey of the body image of mastectomies women referring to imam khomeini and imam hussein hospitals in tehran, iran. Indian J Psychol Med 32:34–37
Waljee JF, Ubel PA, Atisha DM, Hu ES, Alderman AK (2011) The choice for breast cancer surgery: can women accurately predict postoperative quality of life and disease-related stigma? Ann Surg Oncol 18:2477–2482
Marín-Gutzke M, Sánchez-Olaso A (2010) Reconstructive surgery in young women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123:67–74
Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR (2005) Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg 75:940–947
Shi HY, Uen YH, Yen LC, Culbertson R, Juan CH, Hou MF (2011) Two-year quality of life after breast cancer surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:695–702
Collins KK, Liu Y, Schootman M, Aft R, Yan Y, Dean G et al (2011) Effects of breast cancer surgery and surgical side effects on body image over time. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126:167–176
Alipour S, Omranipour R, Akrami R (2013) Obesity should not prevent from TRAM flap breast reconstruction in developing countries. Indian J Surg 2013:1–4
Kanchwala SK, Bucky LP (2008) Optimizing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Cancer J 14:236–240
Gil Zeligson M, Michael Koretz M, Eldad Silberstein M (2011) Uneventful pregnancy and delivery after tram flap reconstruction following bilateral mastectomies. Isr Med Assoc J 13(6):381–383
Chang DW (2012) Breast reconstruction with microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps. Arch Plast Surg 39:3–10
Tan S, Lim J, Yek J, Ong WC, Hing CH, Lim TC (2013) The deep inferior epigastric perforator and pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction: a comparative study. Arch Plast Surg 40:187–191
Nahabedian MY, Manson PN (2002) Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction: a multifactorial analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:81–87 Discussion 88–90
Pagani O, Partridge A, Korde L, Badve S, Bartlett J, Albain K et al (2011) Pregnancy after breast cancer: if you wish, ma’am. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:309–317
Merlo DF, Ceppi M, Filiberti R, Bocchini V, Znaor A, Gamulin M et al (2012) Breast cancer incidence trends in European women aged 20–39 years at diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:363–370
de Bree E, Makrigiannakis A, Askoxylakis J, Melissas J, Tsiftsis DD (2010) Pregnancy after breast cancer. A comprehensive review. J Surg Oncol 101:534–542
Wagner LH, Ruth-Sahd LA (2000) Pregnancy after a TRAM flap procedure: principles of nursing care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 29:363–368
Lawrence WT, McDonald HD (1986) Pregnancy after breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 16:354–355
Patel KM, Basci D, Nahabedian MY (2013) Multiple pregnancies following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:434–436
Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO (1989) Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:828–841 Discussion 842-824
Viterbo R, Luca L, Mélega JM (1989) Pregnancy after breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. A case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:178
Chen L, Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK (1993) Successful pregnancies following TRAM flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:69–71
Mizgala CL, Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK (1994) Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled TRAM flap surgery: 5-to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:988–1002
Carramaschi FR, Ramos ML, Pinotti JA, Ferreira MC (1998) Pregnancy Following Breast Reconstruction with TRAM Flaps. Breast J 4:258–260
Kroll SS (2000) Follow-Up of TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction Patients. Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Tissue 347-363
Parodi PC, Osti M, Longhi P, Rampino E, Anania G, Riberti C (2001) Pregnancy and tram-flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 35:211–215
Johnson MR, Barney LM, King JC (2002) Vaginal delivery of monozygotic twins after bilateral pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1653–1654
Ong WC, Lim J, Lim TC (2004) Successful pregnancy after breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1968–1970
Collin TW, Coady MS (2006) Is pregnancy contraindicated following free TRAM breast reconstruction? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:556–559
Stevens P, Villagrán R, Klenner A (2008) Embarazo y parto vaginal en primigesta posterior a reconstrucción mamaria con colgajo TRAM. Revista chilena de cirugía 60:344–347
Bhat W, Akhtar S, Akali A (2010) Pregnancy in the early stages following DIEP flap breast reconstruction–a review and case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:e782–e784
Lin Y-N, Lin S-D, Lai C-S, Chang K-P, Hou M-F (2012) Is it safe for an Asian woman to be pregnant after TRAM flap surgery for breast reconstruction? A case report. 臺灣整形外科醫學會雜誌 21:343–350
Alipour S, Eskandari A (2013) Perspectives of maternity after breast cancer. Androl Gynecol 2:1–5
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alipour, S., Eskandari, A. Systematic review of effects of pregnancy on breast and abdominal contour after TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 152, 9–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3449-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3449-5