Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare survival and risk of adverse events in women with early stage breast cancer (BC) treated with (1) doxorubicin (A), cyclophosphamide (C) + paclitaxel (P), (2) fluorouracil (F), epirubicin (E), cyclophosphamide (C) + docetaxel (D), or (3) dose-dense AC-P. Retrospective cohort study including 8462 women aged ≥18 years, with resected stage I–III BC, diagnosed between 2003 and 2009 in Ontario, identified through linkage of administrative databases. Primary outcome is overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes are emergency room (ER) visits/hospitalizations, heart failure (HF), and leukemia. 4710 women were treated with FEC-D, 2065 with AC-P, and 1687 with dd AC-P. Adjusted 5-year OS was 92.1, 87.7, and 90.3 %, for each regimen, respectively (p = 0.0006). There was no difference in OS for FEC-D and dd AC-P in the propensity score-matched analyses (HR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.99–1.55). Five-year risk of HF was also similar (HR 1.09; 0.66–1.791.4 % for dd AC-P and 1.3 % for FEC-D and, p = 0.72). Treatment with FEC-D was significantly associated with ER visits and hospital admissions (p < 0.0001). The risks of leukemia were low and similar among the 3 groups (AC-P: 0.34 %, FEC-D: 0.08 %, dd AC-P: 0.12 %; p = 0.09). Although the efficacy of the three regimens was similar to that observed in randomized trials, we report higher toxicity with the use of these regimens in clinical practice. This was especially concerning for the docetaxel-containing regimen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Society CC (2014) http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-101/canadian-cancer-statistics-publication/?region=on
Fisher B, Carbone P, Economou SG, Frelick R, Glass A, Lerner H, Redmond C, Zelen M, Band P, Katrych DL, Wolmark N, Fisher ER (1975) 1-Phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer. A report of early findings. N Engl J Med 292(3):117–122. doi:10.1056/nejm197501162920301
Bonadonna G, Brusamolino E, Valagussa P, Rossi A, Brugnatelli L, Brambilla C, De Lena M, Tancini G, Bajetta E, Musumeci R, Veronesi U (1976) Combination chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer. N Engl J Med 294(8):405–410. doi:10.1056/NEJM197602192940801
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717
Zambetti M, Moliterni A, Materazzo C, Stefanelli M, Cipriani S, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G, Gianni L (2001) Long-term cardiac sequelae in operable breast cancer patients given adjuvant chemotherapy with or without doxorubicin and breast irradiation. J Clin Oncol 19(1):37–43
Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61625-5
Araque Arroyo P, Ubago Perez R, Cancela Diez B, Fernandez Feijoo MA, Hernandez Magdalena J, Calleja Hernandez MA (2011) Controversies in the management of adjuvant breast cancer with taxanes: review of the current literature. Cancer Treat Rev 37(2):105–110. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.06.002
Roche H, Fumoleau P, Spielmann M, Canon JL, Delozier T, Serin D, Symann M, Kerbrat P, Soulie P, Eichler F, Viens P, Monnier A, Vindevoghel A, Campone M, Goudier MJ, Bonneterre J, Ferrero JM, Martin AL, Geneve J, Asselain B (2006) Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial. J Clin Oncol 24(36):5664–5671. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.3916
Swain SM, Jeong J-H, Geyer CE, Costantino JP, Pajon ER, Fehrenbacher L, Atkins JN, Polikoff J, Vogel VG, Erban JK, Rastogi P, Livingston RB, Perez EA, Mamounas EP, Land SR, Ganz PA, Wolmark N (2010) Longer therapy, iatrogenic amenorrhea, and survival in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 362(22):2053–2065. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0909638
Eiermann W, Pienkowski T, Crown J, Sadeghi S, Martin M, Chan A, Saleh M, Sehdev S, Provencher L, Semiglazov V, Press M, Sauter G, Lindsay MA, Riva A, Buyse M, Drevot P, Taupin H, Mackey JR (2011) Phase III study of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concomitant versus sequential docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, node-positive breast cancer: bCIRG-005 trial. J Clin Oncol 29(29):3877–3884. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.28.5437
Swain SM, Tang G, Geyer CE Jr, Rastogi P, Atkins JN, Donnellan PP, Fehrenbacher L, Azar CA, Robidoux A, Polikoff JA, Brufsky AM, Biggs DD, Levine EA, Zapas JL, Provencher L, Northfelt DW, Paik S, Costantino JP, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N (2013) Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial. J Clin Oncol 31(26):3197–3204. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.48.1275
Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S, Jones V, Perez EA, Saphner T, Wolff AC, Sledge GW Jr, Wood WC, Davidson NE (2008) Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 358(16):1663–1671. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707056
Burnell M, Levine MN, Chapman JA, Bramwell V, Gelmon K, Walley B, Vandenberg T, Chalchal H, Albain KS, Perez EA, Rugo H, Pritchard K, O’Brien P, Shepherd LE (2010) Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil versus dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):77–82. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.22.1077
Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L (2003) Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21(8):1431–1439. doi:10.1200/jco.2003.09.081
Gines J, Sabater E, Martorell C, Grau M, Monroy M, Casado MA (2011) Efficacy of taxanes as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Clin Transl Oncol 13(7):485–498. doi:10.1007/s12094-011-0686-x
Eisen A, Fletcher GG, Gandhi S, Mates M, Freedman OC, Dent SF, Trudeau ME (2015) Optimal systemic therapy for early breast cancer in women: a clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 22(Suppl 1):S67–S81. doi:10.3747/co.22.2320
Gandhi S, Fletcher GG, Eisen A, Mates M, Freedman OC, Dent SF, Trudeau ME (2015) Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 22(Suppl 1):S82–S94. doi:10.3747/co.22.2321
Eisen A, Srikanthan A, Yeung L, Iyer R, Trudeau M (2013) Abstract P3-12-11: Provincial variation in utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in early stage breast cancer: data from the cancer care Ontario new drug funding program (NDFP). Cancer Res 73(Suppl 24):3–12. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS13-P3-12-11
ICES (2013) Anual Report. http://www.ices.on.ca/About-ICES/Annual%20Reports
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619
Schultz SE, Rothwell DM, Chen Z, Tu K (2013) Identifying cases of congestive heart failure from administrative data: a validation study using primary care patient records. Chronic Dis Inj Can 33(3):160–166
Parsons LS, Cary NSII (2001) Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. SUGI 26 Proceedings 214–226
Coudert B, Asselain B, Campone M, Spielmann M, Machiels JP, Penault-Llorca F, Serin D, Levy C, Romieu G, Canon JL, Orfeuvre H, Piot G, Petit T, Jerusalem G, Audhuy B, Veyret C, Beauduin M, Eymard JC, Martin AL, Roche H (2012) Extended benefit from sequential administration of docetaxel after standard fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide regimen for node-positive breast cancer: the 8-year follow-up results of the UNICANCER-PACS01 trial. Oncologist 17(7):900–909. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0442
Mullard AP, Misra V, Sumra P, Ali Z, O’Reilly SM, Malik Z (2014) Reducing febrile neutropenia rates in early breast cancer. Experience of two UK cancer centres. Support Care Cancer 22(8):2033–2037. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2141-3
Madarnas Y, Dent SF, Husain SF, Robinson A, Alkhayyat S, Hopman WM, Verreault JL, Vandenberg T (2011) Real-world experience with adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in four Ontario regional cancer centres. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 18(3):119–125
Assi H, Murray J, Boyle L, Rayson D (2014) Incidence of febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D treatment. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2318-9
Enright K, Grunfeld E, Yun L, Moineddin R, Ghannam M, Dent S, Eisen A, Trudeau M, Kaizer L, Earle C, Krzyzanowska MK (2015) Population-based assessment of emergency room visits and hospitalizations among women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 11(2):126–132. doi:10.1200/jop.2014.001073
Smith RE, Bryant J, DeCillis A, Anderson S (2003) Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Experience. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1195–1204
Pinder MC, Duan Z, Goodwin JS, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH (2007) Congestive heart failure in older women treated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(25):3808–3815. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.10.4976
Acknowledgments
This study was supported through provision of data by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) and Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) and through funding support to ICES from an annual grant by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES, CCO, OICR, or the Government of Ontario is intended or should be inferred.
Conflicts of interest
Sofia Torres has received honoraria from BMS, payment for travel, accommodations, or other expenses from BMS, Roche Farmaceutica Quimica, Celldex, and Astra-Zeneca and has received fellowship support from Genomic Health. Maureen Trudeau has stock or other ownership of RNA Diagnostics, has been a consultant or advisor for RNA Diagnostics, and has received honoraria from Roche, payment for travel, accommodations, or other expenses from Roche, and Dr. Trudeau’s institution has received research funding from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, RNA Diagnostics, Roche, Sanofi, Eisai, and Astellas. Andrea Eisen has received payment for travel, accommodations, and other expenses from Astra-Zeneca, and Dr. Eisen’s institution has received research funding from Genomic Health. Craig C. Earle and Kelvin KW Chan have no potential conflicts of interest for disclosure.
Ethical standard
This study received approval from the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Research Ethics Board. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres, S., Trudeau, M., Eisen, A. et al. Adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer: a real-world comparison of chemotherapy regimens in Ontario. Breast Cancer Res Treat 152, 137–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3441-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3441-0