Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer: a real-world comparison of chemotherapy regimens in Ontario

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare survival and risk of adverse events in women with early stage breast cancer (BC) treated with (1) doxorubicin (A), cyclophosphamide (C) + paclitaxel (P), (2) fluorouracil (F), epirubicin (E), cyclophosphamide (C) + docetaxel (D), or (3) dose-dense AC-P. Retrospective cohort study including 8462 women aged ≥18 years, with resected stage I–III BC, diagnosed between 2003 and 2009 in Ontario, identified through linkage of administrative databases. Primary outcome is overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes are emergency room (ER) visits/hospitalizations, heart failure (HF), and leukemia. 4710 women were treated with FEC-D, 2065 with AC-P, and 1687 with dd AC-P. Adjusted 5-year OS was 92.1, 87.7, and 90.3 %, for each regimen, respectively (p = 0.0006). There was no difference in OS for FEC-D and dd AC-P in the propensity score-matched analyses (HR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.99–1.55). Five-year risk of HF was also similar (HR 1.09; 0.66–1.791.4 % for dd AC-P and 1.3 % for FEC-D and, p = 0.72). Treatment with FEC-D was significantly associated with ER visits and hospital admissions (p < 0.0001). The risks of leukemia were low and similar among the 3 groups (AC-P: 0.34 %, FEC-D: 0.08 %, dd AC-P: 0.12 %; p = 0.09). Although the efficacy of the three regimens was similar to that observed in randomized trials, we report higher toxicity with the use of these regimens in clinical practice. This was especially concerning for the docetaxel-containing regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Society CC (2014) http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-101/canadian-cancer-statistics-publication/?region=on

  2. Fisher B, Carbone P, Economou SG, Frelick R, Glass A, Lerner H, Redmond C, Zelen M, Band P, Katrych DL, Wolmark N, Fisher ER (1975) 1-Phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer. A report of early findings. N Engl J Med 292(3):117–122. doi:10.1056/nejm197501162920301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonadonna G, Brusamolino E, Valagussa P, Rossi A, Brugnatelli L, Brambilla C, De Lena M, Tancini G, Bajetta E, Musumeci R, Veronesi U (1976) Combination chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer. N Engl J Med 294(8):405–410. doi:10.1056/NEJM197602192940801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717

  5. Zambetti M, Moliterni A, Materazzo C, Stefanelli M, Cipriani S, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G, Gianni L (2001) Long-term cardiac sequelae in operable breast cancer patients given adjuvant chemotherapy with or without doxorubicin and breast irradiation. J Clin Oncol 19(1):37–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61625-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Araque Arroyo P, Ubago Perez R, Cancela Diez B, Fernandez Feijoo MA, Hernandez Magdalena J, Calleja Hernandez MA (2011) Controversies in the management of adjuvant breast cancer with taxanes: review of the current literature. Cancer Treat Rev 37(2):105–110. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.06.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roche H, Fumoleau P, Spielmann M, Canon JL, Delozier T, Serin D, Symann M, Kerbrat P, Soulie P, Eichler F, Viens P, Monnier A, Vindevoghel A, Campone M, Goudier MJ, Bonneterre J, Ferrero JM, Martin AL, Geneve J, Asselain B (2006) Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial. J Clin Oncol 24(36):5664–5671. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.3916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swain SM, Jeong J-H, Geyer CE, Costantino JP, Pajon ER, Fehrenbacher L, Atkins JN, Polikoff J, Vogel VG, Erban JK, Rastogi P, Livingston RB, Perez EA, Mamounas EP, Land SR, Ganz PA, Wolmark N (2010) Longer therapy, iatrogenic amenorrhea, and survival in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 362(22):2053–2065. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0909638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Eiermann W, Pienkowski T, Crown J, Sadeghi S, Martin M, Chan A, Saleh M, Sehdev S, Provencher L, Semiglazov V, Press M, Sauter G, Lindsay MA, Riva A, Buyse M, Drevot P, Taupin H, Mackey JR (2011) Phase III study of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concomitant versus sequential docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, node-positive breast cancer: bCIRG-005 trial. J Clin Oncol 29(29):3877–3884. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.28.5437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swain SM, Tang G, Geyer CE Jr, Rastogi P, Atkins JN, Donnellan PP, Fehrenbacher L, Azar CA, Robidoux A, Polikoff JA, Brufsky AM, Biggs DD, Levine EA, Zapas JL, Provencher L, Northfelt DW, Paik S, Costantino JP, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N (2013) Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial. J Clin Oncol 31(26):3197–3204. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.48.1275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S, Jones V, Perez EA, Saphner T, Wolff AC, Sledge GW Jr, Wood WC, Davidson NE (2008) Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 358(16):1663–1671. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Burnell M, Levine MN, Chapman JA, Bramwell V, Gelmon K, Walley B, Vandenberg T, Chalchal H, Albain KS, Perez EA, Rugo H, Pritchard K, O’Brien P, Shepherd LE (2010) Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil versus dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):77–82. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.22.1077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L (2003) Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21(8):1431–1439. doi:10.1200/jco.2003.09.081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gines J, Sabater E, Martorell C, Grau M, Monroy M, Casado MA (2011) Efficacy of taxanes as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Clin Transl Oncol 13(7):485–498. doi:10.1007/s12094-011-0686-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisen A, Fletcher GG, Gandhi S, Mates M, Freedman OC, Dent SF, Trudeau ME (2015) Optimal systemic therapy for early breast cancer in women: a clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 22(Suppl 1):S67–S81. doi:10.3747/co.22.2320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gandhi S, Fletcher GG, Eisen A, Mates M, Freedman OC, Dent SF, Trudeau ME (2015) Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 22(Suppl 1):S82–S94. doi:10.3747/co.22.2321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eisen A, Srikanthan A, Yeung L, Iyer R, Trudeau M (2013) Abstract P3-12-11: Provincial variation in utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in early stage breast cancer: data from the cancer care Ontario new drug funding program (NDFP). Cancer Res 73(Suppl 24):3–12. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS13-P3-12-11

  19. ICES (2013) Anual Report. http://www.ices.on.ca/About-ICES/Annual%20Reports

  20. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schultz SE, Rothwell DM, Chen Z, Tu K (2013) Identifying cases of congestive heart failure from administrative data: a validation study using primary care patient records. Chronic Dis Inj Can 33(3):160–166

  23. Parsons LS, Cary NSII (2001) Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. SUGI 26 Proceedings 214–226

  24. Coudert B, Asselain B, Campone M, Spielmann M, Machiels JP, Penault-Llorca F, Serin D, Levy C, Romieu G, Canon JL, Orfeuvre H, Piot G, Petit T, Jerusalem G, Audhuy B, Veyret C, Beauduin M, Eymard JC, Martin AL, Roche H (2012) Extended benefit from sequential administration of docetaxel after standard fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide regimen for node-positive breast cancer: the 8-year follow-up results of the UNICANCER-PACS01 trial. Oncologist 17(7):900–909. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mullard AP, Misra V, Sumra P, Ali Z, O’Reilly SM, Malik Z (2014) Reducing febrile neutropenia rates in early breast cancer. Experience of two UK cancer centres. Support Care Cancer 22(8):2033–2037. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2141-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Madarnas Y, Dent SF, Husain SF, Robinson A, Alkhayyat S, Hopman WM, Verreault JL, Vandenberg T (2011) Real-world experience with adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in four Ontario regional cancer centres. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 18(3):119–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Assi H, Murray J, Boyle L, Rayson D (2014) Incidence of febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D treatment. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2318-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Enright K, Grunfeld E, Yun L, Moineddin R, Ghannam M, Dent S, Eisen A, Trudeau M, Kaizer L, Earle C, Krzyzanowska MK (2015) Population-based assessment of emergency room visits and hospitalizations among women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 11(2):126–132. doi:10.1200/jop.2014.001073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith RE, Bryant J, DeCillis A, Anderson S (2003) Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Experience. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1195–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinder MC, Duan Z, Goodwin JS, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH (2007) Congestive heart failure in older women treated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(25):3808–3815. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.10.4976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported through provision of data by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) and Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) and through funding support to ICES from an annual grant by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES, CCO, OICR, or the Government of Ontario is intended or should be inferred.

Conflicts of interest

Sofia Torres has received honoraria from BMS, payment for travel, accommodations, or other expenses from BMS, Roche Farmaceutica Quimica, Celldex, and Astra-Zeneca and has received fellowship support from Genomic Health. Maureen Trudeau has stock or other ownership of RNA Diagnostics, has been a consultant or advisor for RNA Diagnostics, and has received honoraria from Roche, payment for travel, accommodations, or other expenses from Roche, and Dr. Trudeau’s institution has received research funding from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, RNA Diagnostics, Roche, Sanofi, Eisai, and Astellas. Andrea Eisen has received payment for travel, accommodations, and other expenses from Astra-Zeneca, and Dr. Eisen’s institution has received research funding from Genomic Health. Craig C. Earle and Kelvin KW Chan have no potential conflicts of interest for disclosure.

Ethical standard

This study received approval from the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Research Ethics Board. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Torres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres, S., Trudeau, M., Eisen, A. et al. Adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer: a real-world comparison of chemotherapy regimens in Ontario. Breast Cancer Res Treat 152, 137–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3441-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3441-0

Keywords

Navigation