Abstract
This review will discuss changes relevant to breast cancer caregivers in the fifth edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D’Orsi CJSE, Mendelson EB, Morris EA et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston
Venkatesan A, Chu P, Kerlikowske K, Sickles EA, Smith-Bindman R (2009) Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Radiology 250:648–657
Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ et al (2007) Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 242:388–395
Bent CK, Bassett LW, D’Orsi CJ, Sayre JW (2010) The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 194:1378–1383
Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M (2001) Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 221:495–503
Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD (1998) The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 171:35–40
Lee CH (2004) Problem solving MR imaging of the breast. Radiol Clin North Am 42:919–934
Leung JW, Sickles EA (2007) Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 188:667–675
Mitka M (2007) New ultrasound “elasticity” technique may reduce need for breast biopsies. JAMA 297:455
Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449
Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE (2012) Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 265:59–69
Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Lorusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE (2009) Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. Am J Roentgenol 193:1723–1730
Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA (2007) Probably benign breast masses at US: Is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 244:87–93
King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA (2011) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors declare that this review complies with United States’ ethical standards. As this is a review, no human/animal experiments were performed, and no informed consent was needed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sedgwick, E.L., Ebuoma, L., Hamame, A. et al. BI-RADS update for breast cancer caregivers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150, 243–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3332-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3332-4