Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The endoplasmic reticulum stress markers GRP78 and CHOP predict disease-free survival and responsiveness to chemotherapy in breast cancer

  • Preclinical study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glucose-regulated protein (GRP) 78 and C/-EBP homologous protein (CHOP) are commonly used as markers of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. As an ER chaperone, GRP78 functions as a potent anti-apoptotic factor and confers drug resistance, whereas CHOP is a key initiating factor of ER stress-related cell death. We aimed at investigating the predictive values of GRP78 and CHOP in breast cancer patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. An immunohistochemistry screen for GRP78 and CHOP was performed using a tissue microarray containing 250 tumors from female patients diagnosed with invasive ductal breast carcinoma at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The staining results were scored semi-quantitatively, and a prediction model was constructed to verify the hypothesis. In this retrospective cohort study, CHOP correlated with prolonged disease-free survival (HR = 0.385, 95 % CI 0.215–0.688; P = 0.001), whereas GRP78 showed an opposite association (HR = 4.573; 95 % CI 2.291–9.128; P < 0.001). Moreover, in a GRP78-positive subset, CHOP overexpression correlated with a lower risk of recurrence. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the prediction capability of the predictive model combining the above two markers surpassed that of the traditional model (P = 0.0085 for the area under the curve comparison). Within the anthracycline-treatment subgroup, the combined GRP78 and CHOP exhibited similar predictive significance. Cumulatively, our findings suggest a tight association between ER stress markers and clinical outcomes for patients with breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim I, Xu W, Reed JC (2008) Cell death and endoplasmic reticulum stress: disease relevance and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 7(12):1013–1030. doi:10.1038/nrd2755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabas I, Ron D (2011) Integrating the mechanisms of apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Cell Biol 13(3):184–190. doi:10.1038/ncb0311-184

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luo B, Lee AS (2013) The critical roles of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones and unfolded protein response in tumorigenesis and anticancer therapies. Oncogene 32(7):805–818. doi:10.1038/onc.2012.130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandez PM, Tabbara SO, Jacobs LK, Manning FC, Tsangaris TN, Schwartz AM, Kennedy KA, Patierno SR (2000) Overexpression of the glucose-regulated stress gene GRP78 in malignant but not benign human breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 59(1):15–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee E, Nichols P, Spicer D, Groshen S, Yu MC, Lee AS (2006) GRP78 as a novel predictor of responsiveness to chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Res 66(16):7849–7853. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marciniak SJ, Yun CY, Oyadomari S, Novoa I, Zhang Y, Jungreis R, Nagata K, Harding HP, Ron D (2004) CHOP induces death by promoting protein synthesis and oxidation in the stressed endoplasmic reticulum. Genes Dev 18(24):3066–3077. doi:10.1101/gad.1250704

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalton LE, Clarke HJ, Knight J, Lawson MH, Wason J, Lomas DA, Howat WJ, Rintoul RC, Rassl DM, Marciniak SJ (2013) The endoplasmic reticulum stress marker CHOP predicts survival in malignant mesothelioma. Br J Cancer 108(6):1340–1347. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.66

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang HQ, Du ZX, Zhang HY, Gao DX (2007) Different induction of GRP78 and CHOP as a predictor of sensitivity to proteasome inhibitors in thyroid cancer cells. Endocrinology 148(7):3258–3270. doi:10.1210/en.2006-1564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM, Statistics Subcommittee of NCIEWGoCD (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(2):229–235. doi:10.1007/s10549-006-9242-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2):155–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu KD, Huang AJ, Fan L, Li WF, Shao ZM (2012) Genetic variants in oxidative stress-related genes predict chemoresistance in primary breast cancer: a prospective observational study and validation. Cancer Res 72(2):408–419. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma Y, Brewer JW, Diehl JA, Hendershot LM (2002) Two distinct stress signaling pathways converge upon the CHOP promoter during the mammalian unfolded protein response. J Mol Biol 318(5):1351–1365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moriya S, Che XF, Komatsu S, Abe A, Kawaguchi T, Gotoh A, Inazu M, Tomoda A, Miyazawa K (2013) Macrolide antibiotics block autophagy flux and sensitize to bortezomib via endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated CHOP induction in myeloma cells. Int J Oncol 42(5):1541–1550. doi:10.3892/ijo.2013.1870

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oyadomari S, Mori M (2004) Roles of CHOP/GADD153 in endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Death Differ 11(4):381–389. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma Y, Hendershot LM (2004) The role of the unfolded protein response in tumour development: friend or foe? Nat Rev Cancer 4(12):966–977. doi:10.1038/nrc1505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rutkowski DT, Arnold SM, Miller CN, Wu J, Li J, Gunnison KM, Mori K, Sadighi Akha AA, Raden D, Kaufman RJ (2006) Adaptation to ER stress is mediated by differential stabilities of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic mRNAs and proteins. PLoS Biol 4(11):e374. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040374

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Yin Y, Hua H, Li M, Luo T, Xu L, Wang R, Liu D, Zhang Y, Jiang Y (2009) Blockade of GRP78 sensitizes breast cancer cells to microtubules-interfering agents that induce the unfolded protein response. J Cell Mol Med 13(9B):3888–3897. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00873.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pyrko P, Schonthal AH, Hofman FM, Chen TC, Lee AS (2007) The unfolded protein response regulator GRP78/BiP as a novel target for increasing chemosensitivity in malignant gliomas. Cancer Res 67(20):9809–9816. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gosky D, Chatterjee S (2003) Down-regulation of topoisomerase II alpha is caused by up-regulation of GRP78. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 300(2):327–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee E, Nichols P, Groshen S, Spicer D, Lee AS (2011) GRP78 as potential predictor for breast cancer response to adjuvant taxane therapy. Int J Cancer 128(3):726–731. doi:10.1002/ijc.25370

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fan L, Sun G, Ma T, Zhong F, Lei Y, Li X, Wei W (2013) Melatonin reverses tunicamycin-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells and improves cytotoxic response to doxorubicin by increasing CHOP and decreasing Survivin. J Pineal Res 55(2):184–194. doi:10.1111/jpi.12061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan L, Song B, Sun G, Ma T, Zhong F, Wei W (2013) Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced resistance to doxorubicin is reversed by paeonol treatment in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. PLoS One 8(5):e62627. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062627

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201531, 81202079), the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology Funds (12ZR1406200, 12DZ2260100, 12410707700 and 12140901502), and the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology Fund for 2013 Qimingxing Project (11QA1401400 to X. Hu). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

Informed consent was signed by each participant, and appropriate ethical committee approval was obtained. The experiments comply with the current laws of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Hu or Zhi-Ming Shao.

Additional information

Yi-Zi Zheng and Zhi-Gang Cao contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 169 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, YZ., Cao, ZG., Hu, X. et al. The endoplasmic reticulum stress markers GRP78 and CHOP predict disease-free survival and responsiveness to chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145, 349–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2967-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2967-x

Keywords

Navigation