Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical excision of radial scars diagnosed by core biopsy may help predict future risk of breast cancer

  • Preclinical Study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radial scars (RS’s) are benign breast lesions known to be associated with carcinomas and other high-risk lesions (HRL’s). The upgrade rate to carcinoma after core biopsy revealing RS is 0–40 %. We sought to determine the outcomes of RS with and without HRL diagnosed by core biopsy. Patients who underwent core biopsy revealing RS without carcinoma at our institution between 1/1996 and 11/2012 were identified from a surgical pathology database. Retrospective chart review was utilized to classify patients as RS-no HRL or RS-HRL. HRL was defined as ADH, LCIS, and/or ALH. We determined upgrade rate to carcinoma at surgical excision, and upgrade to HRL for RS-no HRL patients. Univariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for upgrade in RS-no HRL patients. 156 patients underwent core biopsy revealing RS, 131 RS-no HRL (84 %), and 25 RS-HRL (16 %). The overall rate of upgrade to invasive carcinoma was 0.8 % (1/124). 1.0 % (1/102) of RS-no HRL and 13.6 % (3/22) of RS-HRL patients were upgraded to DCIS (P = 0.0023). The upgrade of RS-no HRL to HRL at excision was 21.6 % (22/102). By univariate analysis, RS-no HRL with radiologic appearance of a mass/architectural distortion had a significantly higher rate of upgrade to HRL or carcinoma compared with calcifications (P = 0.03). Excision of RS to rule out associated invasive carcinoma is not warranted, given a <1 % rate of upgrade at excision. However, excision to evaluate for non-invasive cancer or HRL may be considered to help guide clinical decision-making about use of chemoprevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosen P (ed) (1997) Radial sclerosing lesions. Rosen’s breast pathology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Douglas-Jones AG, Pace DP (1997) Pathology of R4 spiculated lesions in the breast screening programme. Histopathology 30(3):214–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitnick JS, Vazquez MF, Harris MN, Roses DF (1989) Differentiation of radial scar from scirrhous carcinoma of the breast: mammographic–pathologic correlation. Radiology 173(3):697–700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciatto S, Morrone D, Catarzi S, Del Turco MR, Bianchi S, Ambrogetti D, Cariddi A (1993) Radial scars of the breast: review of 38 consecutive mammographic diagnoses. Radiology 187(3):757–760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alleva DQ, Smetherman DH, Farr Jr GH, Cederbom GJ (1999) Radial scar of the breast: radiologic–pathologic correlation in 22 cases. Radiographics 19 Spec No: S27–35; discussion S36–37

  6. Finlay ME, Liston JE, Lunt LG, Young JR (1994) Assessment of the role of ultrasound in the differentiation of radial scars and stellate carcinomas of the breast. Clin Radiol 49(1):52–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassell P, Klein-Parker H, Worth A, Poon P (1999) Radial sclerosing lesions of the breast: mammographic and pathologic correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J 50(6):370–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallis MG, Devakumar R, Hosie KB, James KA, Bishop HM (1993) Complex sclerosing lesions (radial scars) of the breast can be palpable. Clin Radiol 48(5):319–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen MA, Sferlazza SJ (2000) Role of sonography in evaluation of radial scars of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(4):1075–1078. doi:10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cawson JN, Nickson C, Evans J, Kavanagh AM (2010) Variation in mammographic appearance between projections of small breast cancers compared with radial scars. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(5):415–420. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02194.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy M, Masterson AV, Kerin M, Flanagan F (2003) Pathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: a review. J Clin Pathol 56(10):721–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Jain KS, Carter D, Lee CH (2000) Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance. Radiology 216(3):831–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frouge C, Tristant H, Guinebretiere JM, Meunier M, Contesso G, Di Paola R, Blery M (1995) Mammographic lesions suggestive of radial scars: microscopic findings in 40 cases. Radiology 195(3):623–625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sloane JP, Mayers MM (1993) Carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in radial scars and complex sclerosing lesions: importance of lesion size and patient age. Histopathology 23(3):225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brenner RJ, Jackman RJ, Parker SH, Evans WP 3rd, Philpotts L, Deutch BM, Lechner MC, Lehrer D, Sylvan P, Hunt R, Adler SJ, Forcier N (2002) Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(5):1179–1184. doi:10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cawson JN, Malara F, Kavanagh A, Hill P, Balasubramanium G, Henderson M (2003) Fourteen-gauge needle core biopsy of mammographically evident radial scars: is excision necessary? Cancer 97(2):345–351. doi:10.1002/cncr.11070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lopez-Medina A, Cintora E, Mugica B, Opere E, Vela AC, Ibanez T (2006) Radial scars diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: surgical biopsy findings. Eur Radiol 16(8):1803–1810. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0196-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Resetkova E, Edelweiss M, Albarracin CT, Yang WT (2011) Management of radial sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed using percutaneous vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy: recommendations for excision based on seven years’ of experience at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(2):335–343. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0119-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Becker L, Trop I, David J, Latour M, Ouimet-Oliva D, Gaboury L, Lalonde L (2006) Management of radial scars found at percutaneous breast biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J 57(2):72–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Linda A, Zuiani C, Furlan A, Londero V, Girometti R, Machin P, Bazzocchi M (2010) Radial scars without atypia diagnosed at imaging-guided needle biopsy: how often is associated malignancy found at subsequent surgical excision, and do mammography and sonography predict which lesions are malignant? AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(4):1146–1151. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Londero V, Zuiani C, Linda A, Battigelli L, Brondani G, Bazzocchi M (2011) Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Eur Radiol 21(6):1200–1206. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-2053-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Douglas-Jones AG, Denson JL, Cox AC, Harries IB, Stevens G (2007) Radial scar lesions of the breast diagnosed by needle core biopsy: analysis of cases containing occult malignancy. J Clin Pathol 60(3):295–298. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.037069

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Osborn G, Wilton F, Stevens G, Vaughan-Williams E, Gower-Thomas K (2011) A review of needle core biopsy diagnosed radial scars in the Welsh Breast Screening Programme. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(2):123–126. doi:10.1308/003588411X12851639107953

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Andacoglu O, Kanbour-Shakir A, Teh YC, Bonaventura M, Ozbek U, Anello M, Ganott M, Kelley J, Dirican A, Soran A (2013) Rationale of excisional biopsy after the diagnosis of benign radial scar on core biopsy: a single institutional outcome analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 36(1):7–11. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e3182354a3f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bianchi S, Giannotti E, Vanzi E, Marziali M, Abdulcadir D, Boeri C, Livi L, Orzalesi L, Sanchez LJ, Susini T, Vezzosi V, Nori J (2012) Radial scar without associated atypical epithelial proliferation on image-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 49 cases from a single-centre and review of the literature. Breast 21(2):159–164. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (2002) Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 26(9):1095–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ingegnoli A, d’Aloia C, Frattaruolo A, Pallavera L, Martella E, Crisi G, Zompatori M (2010) Flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia: carcinoma underestimation rate. Breast J 16(1):55–59. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00850.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGhan LJ, Pockaj BA, Wasif N, Giurescu ME, McCullough AE, Gray RJ (2012) Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: an automatic trigger for excisional biopsy? Ann Surg Oncol 19(10):3264–3269. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2575-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF (2005) Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 29(4):534–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G, Keylock J, Perry J, Eckert M, Fellabaum D, Smith D, Brown T (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2497–2501. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9454-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Niell B, Specht M, Gerade B, Rafferty E (2012) Is excisional biopsy required after a breast core biopsy yields lobular neoplasia? AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):929–935. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.8447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nizri E, Schneebaum S, Klausner JM, Menes TS (2012) Current management practice of breast borderline lesions—need for further research and guidelines. Am J Surg 203(6):721–725. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rajan S, Wason AM, Carder PJ (2011) Conservative management of screen-detected radial scars: role of mammotome excision. J Clin Pathol 64(1):65–68. doi:10.1136/jcp.2010.083485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM, Sharko J, Belli AK, Kim EM, Polubriaginof F, Parmigiani G, Garber JE, Smith BL, Gadd MA, Specht MC, Guidi AJ, Roche CA, Hughes KS (2012) The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):627–633. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2318-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Linda A, Zuiani C, Furlan A, Lorenzon M, Londero V, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M (2012) Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI? AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(2):272–280. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Perfetto F, Fiorentino F, Urbano F, Silecchia R (2009) Adjunctive diagnostic value of MRI in the breast radial scar. Radiol Med (Torino) 114(5):757–770. doi:10.1007/s11547-009-0405-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cawson JN (2005) Can sonography be used to help differentiate between radial scars and breast cancers? Breast 14(5):352–359. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2005.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jacobs TW, Byrne C, Colditz G, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (1999) Radial scars in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340(6):430–436. doi:10.1056/NEJM199902113400604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sanders ME, Page DL, Simpson JF, Schuyler PA, Dale Plummer W, Dupont WD (2006) Interdependence of radial scar and proliferative disease with respect to invasive breast carcinoma risk in patients with benign breast biopsies. Cancer 106(7):1453–1461. doi:10.1002/cncr.21730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Berg JC, Visscher DW, Vierkant RA, Pankratz VS, Maloney SD, Lewis JT, Frost MH, Ghosh K, Degnim AC, Brandt KR, Vachon CM, Reynolds CA, Hartmann LC (2008) Breast cancer risk in women with radial scars in benign breast biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108(2):167–174. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9605-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Manfrin E, Remo A, Falsirollo F, Reghellin D, Bonetti F (2008) Risk of neoplastic transformation in asymptomatic radial scar. Analysis of 117 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107(3):371–377. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9569-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bunting DM, Steel JR, Holgate CS, Watkins RM (2011) Long term follow-up and risk of breast cancer after a radial scar or complex sclerosing lesion has been identified in a benign open breast biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(8):709–713. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.04.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Aroner SA, Collins LC, Connolly JL, Colditz GA, Schnitt SJ, Rosner BA, Hankinson SE, Tamimi RM (2013) Radial scars and subsequent breast cancer risk: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139(1):277–285. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2535-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J, Daly M, Wieand S, Tan-Chiu E, Ford L, Wolmark N (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(18):1371–1388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA, Grady D, Powles TJ, Cauley JA, Norton L, Nickelsen T, Bjarnason NH, Morrow M, Lippman ME, Black D, Glusman JE, Costa A, Jordan VC (1999) The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. Multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation. JAMA 281(23):2189–2197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, McCaskill-Stevens W, Clarfeld RB, Grant MD, Wolmark N (2010) Carcinoma in situ outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010(41):181–186. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ropka ME, Keim J, Philbrick JT (2010) Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 28(18):3090–3095. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.27.8077

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Cynthia L. Miller

  2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Jane A. West, Phoebe E. Freer & Elizabeth Rafferty

  3. Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Anna C. Bettini

  4. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Frederick C. Koerner & Thomas M. Gudewicz

  5. Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Suzanne B. Coopey, Michele A. Gadd, Kevin S. Hughes, Barbara L. Smith & Michelle C. Specht

Authors
  1. Cynthia L. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane A. West
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna C. Bettini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frederick C. Koerner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas M. Gudewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Phoebe E. Freer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Suzanne B. Coopey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michele A. Gadd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kevin S. Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Barbara L. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Elizabeth Rafferty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Michelle C. Specht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle C. Specht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, C.L., West, J.A., Bettini, A.C. et al. Surgical excision of radial scars diagnosed by core biopsy may help predict future risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145, 331–338 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2958-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2958-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation