Intraoperative molecular analysis of total tumor load in sentinel lymph node: a new predictor of axillary status in early breast cancer patients
- 696 Downloads
Objective To assess the intraoperative positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) total tumor load (TTL, defined as the amount of CK19 mRNA copies [copies/μL] in all positive SLNs) obtained by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) and to determine whether it is predictive of non-SLNs involvement. Summary background data The OSNA assay (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) is a new diagnostic technique that uses molecular biological techniques to analyze SLN that has been validated as an accurate method for detection of positive SLN. Although the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial has defined a select cohort of patients in whom a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) may be safely omitted, there are a still a number of patients where prediction of non-SLN metastasis may be helpful for cALND decision making. Multiple studies suggest that specific pathologic characteristics of the primary tumor and the SLN metastases are associated with an increased likelihood of additional positive non-SLN. Methods This is a retrospective multicentric cohort study of 697 patients with cT1-3N0 breast cancer, who had had intraoperative SLN evaluation by OSNA assay with a cALND. TTL is defined as the amount of CK19 mRNA copies number in all positives SLN (copies/μL). Results Univariate logistic regression showed that, in addition to TTL (p < 0.001), the number of affected SLNs (p < 0.001), tumor size (p < 0.001), HER2 status (p = 0.007), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI, p < 0.001) were predictive of ALND status. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that TTL is an independent predictor of metastatic non-SLNs, after adjusting for the tumor size, HER2 status, LVI and, in particular, the number of affected SLNs. Conclusions TTL by OSNA is a newly standardized and automated tool that predicts axillary node status better and independently of the number of affected SLNs and the type of surgery. This value can then help clinicians to personalize surgical treatment. Prospective studies will be carried out to determine the clinical impact of this variable in the management of patients.
KeywordsBreast sentinel lymph node OSNA Total tumor load
This study was supported by a Grant from the Sysmex España S.L. The sponsor had no role in the study design, analysis, or interpretation of the data.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 4.Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB III, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, Cochran AJ, Cody HS III, Edge SB, Galper S et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(30):7703–7720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cserni G, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq JP, Bianchi S, Bussolati G, Boecker W, Borisch B, Connolly CE, Decker T et al (2003) Pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Review of current data to be considered for the formulation of guidelines. Eur J Cancer 39(12):1654–1667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Tamaki Y, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Kaneko T, Tsuda H, Sato K, Ueda S, Mano M, Masuda N, Takeda M et al (2009) Molecular detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter trial using the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay. Clin Cancer Res 15(8):2879–2884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Tamaki Y, Sato N, Homma K, Takabatake D, Nishimura R, Tsujimoto M, Yoshidome K, Tsuda H, Kinoshita T, Kato H et al (2012) Routine clinical use of the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay for detection of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter study in Japan. Cancer 118(14):3477–3483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, Boolbol SK, Fey JV, Tan LK, Borgen PI, Cody HS III, Kattan MW (2003) A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10(10):1140–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Houvenaeghel G, Nos C, Giard S, Mignotte H, Esterni B, Jacquemier J, Buttarelli M, Classe JM, Cohen M, Rouanet P et al (2009) A nomogram predictive of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a sentinel lymph node micrometastasis. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(7):690–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mittendorf EA, Hunt KK, Boughey JC, Bassett R, Degnim AC, Harrell R, Yi M, Meric-Bernstam F, Ross MI, Babiera GV et al (2012) Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg 255(1):109–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, Dowsett M, Fitzgibbons PL, Hanna WM, Langer A et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(1):118–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ, Members P (2011) Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22(8):1736–1747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG et al (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 26.Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT (1993) Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 2(6):335–339; discussion 340Google Scholar
- 27.Cserni G, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq JP, Bianchi S, Boecker W, Borisch B, Connolly CE, Decker T, Dervan P et al (2004) Discrepancies in current practice of pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Results of a questionnaire based survey by the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology. J Clin Pathol 57(7):695–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Meretoja TJ, Leidenius MH, Heikkilä PS, Boross G, Sejben I, Regitnig P, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Zgajnar J, Perhavec A, Gazic B et al (2012) International multicenter tool to predict the risk of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(24):1888–1896. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs455 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar