Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 137, Issue 2, pp 579–587 | Cite as

Reproductive factors and risk of estrogen receptor positive, triple-negative, and HER2-neu overexpressing breast cancer among women 20–44 years of age

  • Christopher I. Li
  • Elisabeth F. Beaber
  • Mei-Tzu Chen Tang
  • Peggy L. Porter
  • Janet R. Daling
  • Kathleen E. Malone
Epidemiology

Abstract

Aspects of reproductive history are among the most well-established breast cancer risk factors. However, relatively little is known about how they influence risk of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer, particularly among younger women. Using data from a population-based case–control study of women 20–44 years of age, we assessed the relationships between various reproductive factors and risk of estrogen receptor positive (ER+), triple-negative, and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers. Detailed reproductive histories were obtained through structured interviewer administered in-person questionnaires. Reproductive histories among control women (n = 941) were compared to those of ER+ cases (n = 781), triple-negative cases (n = 180), and HER2-overexpressing cases (n = 60) using polytomous logistic regression. Age at menarche, parity, and number of full-term pregnancies were similarly associated with risk of all three breast cancer subtypes. In contrast, age at first live birth, the interval between age at menarche and age at first birth, and breastfeeding were inversely associated with risk of triple-negative breast cancer (P values for trend 0.002, 0.006 and 0.018, respectively), but were not associated with risk of ER+ or HER2-overexpressing cancers. A strong inverse association between breastfeeding and risk of triple-negative breast cancer has now been consistently observed across numerous studies, and at present it is the most well-established protective factor for this aggressive and lethal form of breast cancer. Further studies clarifying the biological mechanisms underlying this relationship and confirming our results with respect to age at first birth and the interval between age at menarche and age at first birth are needed.

Keywords

Breast cancer Triple-negative Estrogen receptor Reproductive factors 

References

  1. 1.
    Clavel-Chapelon F, Gerber M (2002) Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk. Do they differ according to age at diagnosis? Breast Cancer Res Treat 72:107–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet 360:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, Deng S, Johnsen H, Pesich R, Geisler S, Demeter J, Perou CM, Lonning PE, Brown PO, Borresen-Dale AL, Botstein D (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8418–8423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, Deming SL, Geradts J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Moorman PG, Earp HS, Millikan RC (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295:2492–2502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim MJ, Ro JY, Ahn SH, Kim HH, Kim SB, Gong G (2006) Clinicopathologic significance of the basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a comparison with hormone receptor and Her2/neu-overexpressing phenotypes. Hum Pathol 37:1217–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma H, Wang Y, Sullivan-Halley J, Weiss L, Marchbanks PA, Spirtas R, Ursin G, Burkman RT, Simon MS, Malone KE, Strom BL, McDonald JA, Press MF, Bernstein L (2010) Use of four biomarkers to evaluate the risk of breast cancer subtypes in the women’s contraceptive and reproductive experiences study. Cancer Res 70:575–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaudet MM, Press MF, Haile RW, Lynch CF, Glaser SL, Schildkraut J, Gammon MD, Douglas TW, Bernstein JL (2011) Risk factors by molecular subtypes of breast cancer across a population-based study of women 56 years or younger. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:587–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Millikan RC, Newman B, Tse CK, Moorman PG, Conway K, Dressler LG, Smith LV, Labbok MH, Geradts J, Bensen JT, Jackson S, Nyante S, Livasy C, Carey L, Earp HS, Perou CM (2008) Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109:123–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang XR, Sherman ME, Rimm DL, Lissowska J, Brinton LA, Peplonska B, Hewitt SM, Anderson WF, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Bardin-Mikolajczak A, Zatonski W, Cartun R, Mandich D, Rymkiewicz G, Ligaj M, Lukaszek S, Kordek R, Garcia-Closas M (2007) Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:439–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phipps AI, Chlebowski R, Prentice R, McTiernan A, Wactawski-Wende J, Kuller LH, Adams-Campbell LL, Lane D, Stefanick ML, Vitolins M, Kabat GC, Rohan TE, Li CI (2011) Reproductive history and oral contraceptive use in relation to risk of triple-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:470–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phipps AI, Malone KE, Porter PL, Daling JR, Li CI (2008) Reproductive and hormonal risk factors for postmenopausal luminal, HER-2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 113:1521–1526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clavel-Chapelon F (2002) Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women. Br J Cancer 86:723–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li CI, Beaber EF, Chen Tang MT, Porter PL, Daling JR, Malone KE (2012) Effect of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate on breast cancer risk among women 20 to 44 years of age. Cancer Res 72:2028–2035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phipps AI, Buist DS, Malone KE, Barlow WE, Porter PL, Kerlikowske K, Li CI (2010) Family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives and triple-negative breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126:671–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phipps AI, Chlebowski RT, Prentice R, McTiernan A, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-Wende J, Kuller LH, Adams-Campbell LL, Lane D, Vitolins M, Kabat GC, Rohan TE, Li CI (2011) Body size, physical activity, and risk of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20:454–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Phipps AI, Malone KE, Porter PL, Daling JR, Li CI (2008) Body size and risk of luminal, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:2078–2086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waksberg J (1978) Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Stat Assoc 73:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Begg CB, Gray R (1984) Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions. Biometrika 71:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andrieu N, Prevost T, Rohan TE, Luporsi E, Le MG, Gerber M, Zaridze DG, Lifanova Y, Renaud R, Lee HP, Duffy SW (2000) Variation in the interaction between familial and reproductive factors on the risk of breast cancer according to age, menopausal status, and degree of familiarity. Int J Epidemiol 29:214–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andrieu N, Smith T, Duffy S, Zaridze DG, Renaud R, Rohan T, Gerber M, Luporsi E, Le M, Lee HP, Lifanova Y, Day NE (1998) The effects of interaction between familial and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk: a combined analysis of seven case–control studies. Br J Cancer 77:1525–1536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clavel-Chapelon F (2002) Cumulative number of menstrual cycles and breast cancer risk: results from the E3N cohort study of French women. Cancer Causes Control 13:831–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR, Potter JD, Bernstein L, Marchbanks PA, Strom BL, Simon MS, Press MF, Ursin G, Burkman RT, Folger SG, Norman S, McDonald JA, Spirtas R (2008) Timing of menarche and first full-term birth in relation to breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 167:230–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Russo J, Gusterson BA, Rogers AE, Russo IH, Wellings SR, van Zwieten MJ (1990) Comparative study of human and rat mammary tumorigenesis. Lab Invest 62:244–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russo J, Russo IH (1997) Role of differentiation in the pathogenesis and prevention of breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 4:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown M, Tsodikov A, Bauer KR, Parise CA, Caggiano V (2008) The role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in the survival of women with estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative, invasive breast cancer: the California Cancer Registry, 1999–2004. Cancer 112:737–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lund MJ, Butler EN, Bumpers HL, Okoli J, Rizzo M, Hatchett N, Green VL, Brawley OW, Oprea-Ilies GM, Gabram SG (2008) High prevalence of triple-negative tumors in an urban cancer center. Cancer 113:608–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shinde SS, Forman MR, Kuerer HM, Yan K, Peintinger F, Hunt KK, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L, Symmans WF (2010) Higher parity and shorter breastfeeding duration: association with triple-negative phenotype of breast cancer. Cancer 116:4933–4943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stark A, Kapke A, Schultz D, Brown R, Linden M, Raju U (2008) Advanced stages and poorly differentiated grade are associated with an increased risk of HER2/neu positive breast carcinoma only in White women: findings from a prospective cohort study of African-American and White-American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107:405–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group (2000) Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group. Br J Cancer 83:1301–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Loman N, Johannsson O, Kristoffersson U, Olsson H, Borg A (2001) Family history of breast and ovarian cancers and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of early-onset breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1215–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malone KE, Daling JR, Doody DR, Hsu L, Bernstein L, Coates RJ, Marchbanks PA, Simon MS, McDonald JA, Norman SA, Strom BL, Burkman RT, Ursin G, Deapen D, Weiss LK, Folger S, Madeoy JJ, Friedrichsen DM, Suter NM, Humphrey MC, Spirtas R, Ostrander EA (2006) Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years. Cancer Res 66:8297–8308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peto J, Collins N, Barfoot R, Seal S, Warren W, Rahman N, Easton DF, Evans C, Deacon J, Stratton MR (1999) Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:943–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher I. Li
    • 1
  • Elisabeth F. Beaber
    • 1
  • Mei-Tzu Chen Tang
    • 1
  • Peggy L. Porter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Janet R. Daling
    • 1
  • Kathleen E. Malone
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Human BiologyFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations