Bloody nipple discharge is a predictor of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Nipple discharge is a common complaint of patients with breast disease. The color of nipple discharge is always the first alarming symptom for patients. It is controversial whether the discharge color is an indicator of an underlying malignancy. The electronic database PubMed was searched for relevant articles. A meta-analysis about the association between the color of nipple discharge and breast cancer risk was conducted. Eight studies, including 3,110 patients, were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared with patients in non-bloody nipple discharge group (179/1,478), patients in bloody nipple discharge group (404/1,632) had a markedly higher breast cancer risk (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.32–3.89, P < 0.001 for heterogeneity). Compared with patients in clear/serous group (71/575), patients in bloody nipple discharge group (326/1,271) also had a higher risk (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.25–4.93, P = 0.011 for heterogeneity). Furthermore, compared with patients in the colored group (55/448), patients in bloody nipple discharge group (296/1,124) (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.74–5.45, P = 0.009 for heterogeneity) had no significant difference. Besides, there was no significant difference between patients in colored group (55/448) and clear/serous group (61/470) (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.83–2.18, P = 0.707 for heterogeneity). Therefore, bloody nipple discharge could be a predictor of breast cancer risk among different colors of discharges. The symptom of bloody nipple discharge is helpful to the stratification of preoperative patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Gulay H, Bora S, Kilicturgay S, Hamaloglu E, Goksel HA (1994) Management of nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 178(5):471–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Murphy IG, Dillon MF, Doherty AO, McDermott EW, Kelly G, O’Higgins N, Hill AD (2007) Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 96(6):457–463. doi:10.1002/jso.20801

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lang JE, Kuerer HM (2007) Breast ductal secretions: clinical features, potential uses, and possible applications. Cancer Control 14(4):350–359

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kooistra BW, Wauters C, van de Ven S, Strobbe L (2009) The diagnostic value of nipple discharge cytology in 618 consecutive patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(6):573–577. doi:S0748-7983(08)01768-X[pii]10.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.009

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kapenhas-Valdes E, Feldman SM, Boolbol SK (2008) The role of mammary ductoscopy in breast cancer: a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 15(12):3350–3360. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-9911-4

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Simmons R, Adamovich T, Brennan M, Christos P, Schultz M, Eisen C, Osborne M (2003) Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 10(2):113–116

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Klein P, Glaser E, Grogan L, Keane M, Lipkowitz S, Soballe P, Brooks L, Jenkins J, Steinberg SM, DeMarini DM, Kirsch I (2001) Biomarker assays in nipple aspirate fluid. Breast J 7(6):378–387. doi:07601[pii]

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sauter ER, Ross E, Daly M, Klein-Szanto A, Engstrom PF, Sorling A, Malick J, Ehya H (1997) Nipple aspirate fluid: a promising non-invasive method to identify cellular markers of breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 76(4):494–501

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Phillips HA, Howard GC, Miller WR (1999) Nipple aspirate fluid in relation to breast cancer. Breast 8(4):169–174. doi:S0960-9776(99)90047-4[pii]10.1054/brst.1999.0047

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Osako T, Iwase T, Takahashi K, Iijima K, Miyagi Y, Nishimura S, Tada K, Makita M, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G, Kasumi F (2007) Diagnostic mammography and ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years. Breast Cancer 14(3):255–259. doi:JST.JSTAGE/jbcs/14.255[pii]

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu GY, Lu JS, Shen KW, Wu J, Chen CM, Hu Z, Shen ZZ, Zhang TQ, Shao ZM (2008) Fiberoptic ductoscopy combined with cytology testing in the patients of spontaneous nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108(2):271–277. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9598-4

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Singletary SE, Stephens TW, Marcy S, Meric F, Ross MI, Babiera GV, Ames FC, Kuerer HM (2003) Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 196(3):354–364. doi:S1072-7515(02)01606-X[pii]10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01606-X

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Leis HP Jr (1989) Management of nipple discharge. World J Surg 13(6):736–742

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu X, Wang Z, Yu J, Lei G, Wang S (2010) Three polymorphisms in interleukin-1beta gene and risk for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(3):821–825. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0910-3

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhou WB, Xue DQ, Liu XA, Ding Q, Wang S (2011) The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. doi:10.1007/s00432-011-0979-z

  16. 16.

    Zhou WB, Ding Q, Chen L, Liu XA, Wang S (2011) Toremifene is an effective and safe alternative to tamoxifen in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: results of four randomized trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1556-5

  17. 17.

    Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH (1997) Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 127(9):820–826

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22(4):719–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188. doi:0197-2456(86)90046-2[pii]

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dolan RT, Butler JS, Kell MR, Gorey TF, Stokes MA (2010) Nipple discharge and the efficacy of duct cytology in evaluating breast cancer risk. Surgeon 8(5):252–258. doi:S1479-666X(10)00126-5[pii]10.1016/j.surge.2010.03.005

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Montroni I, Santini D, Zucchini G, Fiacchi M, Zanotti S, Ugolini G, Manaresi A, Taffurelli M (2010) Nipple discharge: is its significance as a risk factor for breast cancer fully understood? Observational study including 915 consecutive patients who underwent selective duct excision. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123(3):895–900. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0815-1

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Morrogh M, Park A, Elkin EB, King TA (2010) Lessons learned from 416 cases of nipple discharge of the breast. Am J Surg 200(1):73–80. doi:S0002-9610(09)00518-2[pii]10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.021

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sauter ER, Winn JN, Dale PS, Wagner-Mann C (2006) Nipple aspirate fluid color is associated with breast cancer. Cancer Detect Prev 30(4):322–328. doi:S0361-090X(06)00111-5[pii]10.1016/j.cdp.2006.07.006

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dillon MF, Mohd Nazri SR, Nasir S, McDermott EW, Evoy D, Crotty TB, O’Higgins N, Hill AD (2006) The role of major duct excision and microdochectomy in the detection of breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer 6:164. doi:1471-2407-6-164[pii]10.1186/1471-2407-6-164

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hou MF, Huang TJ, Liu GC (2001) The diagnostic value of galactography in patients with nipple discharge. Clin Imaging 25(2):75–81. doi:S0899-7071(01)00256-X[pii]

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Goksel HA, Yagmurdur MC, Demirhan B, Isiklar I, Karakayali H, Bilgin N, Haberal M (2005) Management strategies for patients with nipple discharge. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390(1):52–58. doi:10.1007/s00423-004-0515-6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Richards T, Hunt A, Courtney S, Umeh H (2007) Nipple discharge: a sign of breast cancer? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(2):124–126. doi:10.1308/003588407X155491

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Seltzer MH (2004) Breast complaints, biopsies, and cancer correlated with age in 10, 000 consecutive new surgical referrals. Breast J 10(2):111–117. doi:21284[pii]

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Leis HP Jr, Greene FL, Cammarata A, Hilfer SE (1988) Nipple discharge: surgical significance. South Med J 81(1):20–26

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lanitis S, Filippakis G, Thomas J, Christofides T, Al Mufti R, Hadjiminas DJ (2008) Microdochectomy for single-duct pathologic nipple discharge and normal or benign imaging and cytology. Breast 17(3):309–313. doi:S0960-9776(07)00279-2[pii]10.1016/j.breast.2007.11.008

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wong L, Chung YF, Wong CY (2000) Microdochectomy for single-duct nipple discharge. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29(2):198–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hussain AN, Policarpio C, Vincent MT (2006) Evaluating nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol Surv 61(4):278–283. doi:0006254-200604000-00025[pii]10.1097/01.ogx.0000210242.44171.f6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zervoudis S, Iatrakis G, Economides P, Polyzos D, Navrozoglou I (2010) Nipple discharge screening. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 6(1):135–151. doi:10.2217/whe.09.81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nelson RS, Hoehn JL (2006) Twenty-year outcome following central duct resection for bloody nipple discharge. Ann Surg 243(4):522–524. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000205828.61184.3100000658-200604000-00014[pii]

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81071753), the Six Kinds of Outstanding Talent Foundation of Jiangsu Province (06-B-069 and 2009, To Qiang Ding), the Science and Education for Health Foundation of Jiangsu Province (RC2007054), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2008476, BK2009438, and BK2010581), the Program for Development of Innovative Research Team in the First Affiliated Hospital of NJMU (IRT-008), and A project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shui Wang.

Additional information

Ling Chen and Wen-Bin Zhou contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, L., Zhou, WB., Zhao, Y. et al. Bloody nipple discharge is a predictor of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132, 9–14 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1787-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bloody nipple discharge
  • Breast cancer
  • Risk factor
  • Meta-analysis