Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estrogen receptor-α directly regulates sensitivity to paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

  • Preclinical Study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become the standard treatment for advanced breast cancer. Several prognostic markers, including estrogen receptor-α (ERα), are used to predict the response to NAC. However, the molecular significance of ERα expression in the efficacy of chemotherapy is not yet fully understood. To examine this issue, we first evaluated ERα transcriptional activity in breast cancer cells derived from pre-NAC specimens using estrogen response element–green fluorescent protein (ERE–GFP) as a reporter gene, and found that, in the cases for which ERα activities determined by GFP expression were not detected or low, pCR (pathological complete response) could be achieved even though ERα protein was expressed. Next, we examined the effects of alterations in ERα expression levels on sensitivity to paclitaxel, a key drug in NAC, by stable expression of ERα in ER-negative SKBR3 cells and by siRNA-mediated down-regulation of ERα in ER-positive MCF-7 cells, and showed that ERα expression and sensitivity to paclitaxel showed an inverse correlation. We also established paclitaxel-resistant MCF-7 cell clones and found that they have higher estrogen-induced ER activity than parent cells. Paclitaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing agent, while HDAC6 (histone deacetylase 6), which we previously identified as an estrogen-regulated gene, enhances cell motility by destabilizing microtubules via deacetylation of α-tubulin. Finally, we demonstrate herein that ERα knockdown in MCF-7 cells prevents deacetylation of α-tubulin, thereby increasing sensitivity to paclitaxel. Taken together, these results suggest that ERα expression directly regulates sensitivity to paclitaxel in NAC for breast cancer via the effect on microtubule stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lippman ME, Allegra JC, Thompson EB et al (1978) The relation between estrogen receptors and response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 298:1223–1228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Conforti R, Boulet T, Tomasic G et al (2007) Breast cancer molecular subclassification and estrogen receptor expression to predict efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines-based chemotherapy: a biomarker study from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol 18:1477–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Henderson IC et al (2006) Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA 295:1658–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Green MC, Buzdar AU, Smith T et al (2005) Weekly paclitaxel improves pathologic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with paclitaxel once every 3 weeks. J Clin Oncol 23:5983–5992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazouni C, Kau SW, Frye D et al (2007) Inclusion of taxanes, particularly weekly paclitaxel, in preoperative chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response rate in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Ann Oncol 18:874–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A et al (2003) The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 21:4165–4174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher B, Bryant J, Workmark N et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chollet P, Amat S, Cure H et al (2002) Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 86:1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Galdos C, Tarter PI, Estabrook A, Gistrak MA, Jaffer S, Bleiweiss IJ (2002) Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 80:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang JC, Wooten EC, Tsimelzon A et al (2003) Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to Docetaxel in patients with breast cancer. Lancet 362:362–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Charles AG, Han TY, Liu YY, Hansen N, Giuliano AE, Cabot MC (2001) Taxol-induced ceramide generation and apotosis in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 47:444–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Theriault RL et al (1999) Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:3412–3417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P et al (2003) Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol 21:588–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin M, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Ruiz A et al (2008) Randomaized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone or followed by paclitaxel for early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:805–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG et al (2007) HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1496–1506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Inoue A, Yoshida N, Omoto Y et al (2002) Development of cDNA microarray for expression profiling of estrogen-responsive genes. J Mol Endocrinol 9:175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, Yamashita H, Toyama T et al (2004) HDAC6 expression is correlated with better survival in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15:6962–6968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hubbert C, Guardiola A, Shao R et al (2002) HDAC6 is a microtubule-associated deacetylase. Nature 417:455–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamaguchi Y, Takei H, Suemasu K et al (2005) Tumor-stromal interaction through the estrogen-signaling pathway in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 65:4653–4662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayashi S, Niwa T, Yamaguchi Y (2009) Estrogen signaling pathway and its imaging in human breast cancer. Cancer Sci 100:1773–1778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsumoto M, Yamaguchi Y, Seino Y et al (2008) Estrogen signaling ability in human endometrial cancer through the cancer–stromal interaction. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:451–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi S (2009) Estrogen-related cancer microenvironment of breast carcinoma. Endocr J 56:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pusztai L (2007) Markers predicting clinical benefit in breast cancer from microtubule-targeting agents. Ann Oncol 18(Suppl 12):15–20

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gan Y, Wientjes MG, Lu J, Au JL (1998) Cytostatic and apoptotic effects of paclitaxel in human breast tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 42:177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayashi S, Yamaguchi Y (2008) Estrogen signaling in cancer microenvironment and prediction of response to hormone therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 109:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Palazzo A, Ackerman B, Gundersen GG (2003) Cell biology: tubulin acetylation and cell motility. Nature 421:230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Saji S, Kawakami M, Hayashi S et al (2005) Significance of HDAC6 regulation via estrogen signaling for cell motility and prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Oncogene 24:4531–4539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all staff members of the Department of Breast Oncology, including physicians, nurses, and sonography technicians, at Juntendo University Hospital for their valuable suggestions and generous cooperation. We also thank Dr. Shigehira Saji at Kyoto University for his valuable advice, and are especially grateful to Akiyo Yamashita and Dr. Tetsuji Suda at Saitama Cancer Center and Makiko Hirose at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital for their excellent technical assistance. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan; a Grant-in Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan; the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Science of the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO); and a grant from the Smoking Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuri Yamaguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tokuda, E., Seino, Y., Arakawa, A. et al. Estrogen receptor-α directly regulates sensitivity to paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133, 427–436 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1758-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1758-x

Keywords

Navigation