Skip to main content

Reproductive factors associated with mammographic density: a Korean co-twin control study

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment volume 128, pages 567–572 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

To determine the mechanism by which menstrual and reproductive factors are associated with the risk of breast cancer, we examined the relationships between mammographic density and known menstrual and reproductive risk factors for breast cancer. A co-twin control study was conducted with 122 pairs of monozygotic Korean female twins selected from the Healthy Twin study. Mammographic density was measured from digital mammograms using a computer-assisted method. Information on selected menstrual and reproductive factors was collected through a self-administered questionnaire. Within-pair differences for each mammographic measure were regressed against within-pair differences for each menstrual and reproductive risk factor with an adjustment for body mass index and other menstrual and reproductive factors. The percent dense area was inversely associated with the age at the first full-term childbirth (FFTB) and the number of live births, although the associations were marginally significant with an adjustment for BMI and other reproductive factors. The non-dense area was positively associated with the age at the FFTB and the number of live births. The absolute dense area was positively associated with the duration of breast feeding. The age at menarche was not associated with any component of the mammographic measures. This finding suggests that mammographic density can mediate the protective effect of greater parity against breast cancer, at least in part while age at menarche, age at the FFTB, and breast feeding do not exert their effects through mammographic density.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Kelsey JL, Gammon MD, John EM (1993) Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 15:36–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li T, Sun L, Miller N, Nicklee T, Woo J, Hulse-Smith L, Tsao MS, Khokha R, Martin L, Boyd N (2005) The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:343–349

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Haile R (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1622–1629

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:1133–1144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagata C, Matsubara T, Fujita H, Nagao Y, Shibuya C, Kashiki Y, Shimizu H (2005) Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Br J Cancer 92:2102–2106

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Wilkens LR, Kolonel LN (2005) Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 162:743–752

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, Bernstein L, Salane M, Parisky YR, Astrahan M, Siozon CC, Pike MC (2003) Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:332–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Waard F, Rombach JJ, Collette HJ, Slotboom B (1984) Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns. J Natl Cancer Inst 72:1277–1282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitehead J, Carlile T, Kopecky KJ, Thompson DJ, Gilbert FI Jr, Present AJ, Threatt BA, Krook P, Hadaway E (1985) The relationship between Wolfe’s classification of mammograms, accepted breast cancer risk factors, and the incidence of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 122:994–1006

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Tritchler D, Chiarelli A, Yaffe MJ, Hopper JL (2002) Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:886–894

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Cawson JN, Hegele RA, Chiarelli AM, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF, Hopper JL (2006) The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:612–617

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sung J, Song YM, Stone J, Lee K, Jeong JI, Kim SS (2010) Genetic influences on mammographic density in Korean twin and family: the Healthy Twin study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:467–474

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang JY, Shin C, Frongillo EA, Shin KR, Jo I (2003) Secular trend in age at menarche for South Korean women born between 1920 and 1986: the Ansan Study. Ann Hum Biol 30:434–442

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mauldin WP (1978) Patterns of fertility decline in developing countries, 1950–75. Stud Fam Plann 9:75–84

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sung J, Cho SI, Lee K, Ha M, Choi EY, Choi JS, Kim H, Kim J, Hong KS, Kim Y, Yoo KY, Park C, Song YM (2006) Healthy Twin: a twin-family study of Korea—protocols and current status. Twin Res Hum Genet 9:844–848

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA, Shumak RS, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Boyd NF (1998) Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 18:1587–1598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Song YM, Lee D, Lee K, Lee HJ, Sung J, Han B (2010) Validity of the zygosity questionnaire and characteristics of zygosity-misdiagnosed twin pairs in the Healthy Twin Study of Korea. Twin Res Hum Genet 13:223–230

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stone J, Warren RM, Pinney E, Warwick J, Cuzick J (2009) Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density. Am J Epidemiol 170:1571–1578

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, Scott CG, Maloney SD, Carston MJ, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA (2007) Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:43–49

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maskarinec G, Meng L (2000) A case-control study of mammographic densities in Hawaii. Breast Cancer Res Treat 63:153–161

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brisson J, Sadowsky NL, Twaddle JA, Morrison AS, Cole P, Merletti F (1982) The relation of mammographic features of the breast to breast cancer risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 115:438–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Butler LM, Gold EB, Greendale GA, Crandall CJ, Modugno F, Oestreicher N, Quesenberry CP Jr, Habel LA (2008) Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:165–174

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heng D, Gao F, Jong R, Fishell E, Yaffe M, Martin L, Li T, Stone J, Sun L, Hopper J, Boyd NF (2004) Risk factors for breast cancer associated with mammographic features in Singaporean Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:1751–1758

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grove JS, Goodman MJ, Gilbert FI Jr, Mi MP (1985) Factors associated with mammographic pattern. Br J Radiol 58:21–25

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pike MC, Krailo MD, Henderson BE, Casagrande JT, Hoel DG (1983) ‘Hormonal’ risk factors, ‘breast tissue age’ and the age-incidence of breast cancer. Nature 303:767–770

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gapstur SM, Lopez P, Colangelo LA, Wolfman J, Van HL, Hendrick RE (2003) Associations of breast cancer risk factors with breast density in Hispanic women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1074–1080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ursin G, Sun CL, Koh WP, Khoo KS, Gao F, Wu AH, Yu MC (2006) Associations between soy, diet, reproductive factors, and mammographic density in Singapore Chinese women. Nutr Cancer 56:128–135

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang L, Jacobsen KH (2008) A systematic review of the association between breastfeeding and breast cancer. J Womens Health 17:1635–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E (2001) Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2:133–140

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tay CC, Glasier AF, McNeilly AS (1996) Twenty-four hour patterns of prolactin secretion during lactation and the relationship to suckling and the resumption of fertility in breast-feeding women. Hum Reprod 11:950–955

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Das R, Vonderhaar BK (1997) Prolactin as a mitogen in mammary cells. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2:29–39

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Riza E, dos SSI, De SB, Perry N, Karadedou-Zafiriadou E, Linos D, Remoundos DD, Linos A (2005) Correlates of high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns by menopausal status in a rural population in Northern Greece. Eur J Cancer 41:590–600

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Boyd NF, Stone J, Martin LJ, Jong R, Fishell E, Yaffe M, Hammond G, Minkin S (2002) The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities. Br J Cancer 87:876–882

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dite GS, Gurrin LC, Byrnes GB, Stone J, Gunasekara A, McCredie MR, English DR, Giles GG, Cawson J, Hegele RA, Chiarelli AM, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF, Hopper JL (2008) Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:3474–3481

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van OC, Bosmans H, Van SA, Joossens K, Celis V, Van GM, Verslegers I, Nijs K, Rogge F, Marchal G (2006) Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol 16:1360–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Skaane P (2009) Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 50:3–14

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Genome Research Institute, Korea, National Institute of Health research contract (budgets 2005-347-2400-2440-215, 2006-347-2400-2440-215, 2007-347-2400-2440-215, 2008-E00255-00, and 2009-E00500-00), Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant Number M10305030005), and the Samsung Biomedical Research Institute (#SBRI C- A9-218-1). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily any funding body.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

    Joohon Sung & Donghun Lee

  2. Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, and Center for Clinical Research, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwondong, Gangnamgu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea

    Yun-Mi Song

  3. Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Jennifer Stone

  4. Department of Family Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

    Kayoung Lee

Authors
  1. Joohon Sung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yun-Mi Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kayoung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Donghun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Mi Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sung, J., Song, YM., Stone, J. et al. Reproductive factors associated with mammographic density: a Korean co-twin control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128, 567–572 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1469-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1469-3

Keywords

  • Breast feeding
  • Breast neoplasms
  • Mammography
  • Menarche
  • Parity