Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pathological complete response after preoperative systemic therapy and outcome: relevance of clinical and biologic baseline features

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate the outcome of patients with breast cancer according to response after primary therapy and according to clinical and biologic baseline features, we identified patients who were treated with preoperative therapy and who underwent surgery at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy, between 1995 and 2006. The outcome of patients who achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) and patients with residual disease (RD) at final surgery was analyzed. Of the 687 patients treated with preoperative therapy, we identified 82 patients who achieved pCR (12%) and 605 patients with RD (88%). A statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) was observed for patients with pCR compared with those who had RD (5 year DFS 73% vs. 59% P = 0.029; 5 year DDFS 81% vs. 72% P = 0.085; 5 year OS 88% vs. 77% P = 0.033). At the multivariate analysis, for patients achieving pCR, large tumor size (>5 cm) correlated with worse DFS (HR 3.18; 95% CI 1.34–7.51); clinical nodal involvement was associated with poorer DFS and DDFS (HR 6.94; 95% CI 1.62–29.73 and HR 9.87 95% CI 1.29–75.53, respectively). pCR after preoperative systemic therapy correlated with significant improved outcome. A substantial rate of relapse was observed for patients with large tumors and with clinical nodal involvement at baseline. Further improvement in adjuvant treatment might be warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guarneri V, Broglio K, Kau SW et al (2006) Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. J Clin Oncol 24:1037–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hennessy BT, Hortobagy GN, Rouzier RN et al (2005) Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:9304–9311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TM et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colleoni M, Viale G, Zahrieh D et al (2004) Chemotherapy is more effective in patients with breast cancer not expressing steroid hormone receptors: a study of preoperative treatment. Clin Cancer Res 10:6622–6628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouzier R, Pusztai L, Delaloge S et al (2004) Nomograms to predict pathologic complete response and metastasis-free survival after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:2294–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR et al (2008) Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long term survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1274–1281

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A et al (2003) The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 21:4165–4174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 406(6797):747–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Ronde JJ, Hannemann J, Halfwerk H et al (2010) Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119(1):119–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D et al (2009) Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(10):736–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hugh J, Hanson J, Chon M et al (2009) Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. J Clin Oncol 27:1168–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W et al (2006) Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Colleoni M, Orvieto E, Nolè F et al (1999) Prediction of response to primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 35:574–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD et al (1998) Meeting highlights: international consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1601–1608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chollet P, Amat S, Cure H et al (2002) Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 86:1041–1046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, McGuire SE, Buchholz TA et al (2005) Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:7098–7104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dawood S, Broglio K, Kau S-W et al (2008) Prognostic value of initial clinical disease stage after achieving pathological complete response. Oncologist 13:6–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilia Montagna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montagna, E., Bagnardi, V., Rotmensz, N. et al. Pathological complete response after preoperative systemic therapy and outcome: relevance of clinical and biologic baseline features. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124, 689–699 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1027-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1027-4

Keywords

Navigation