Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 387–396 | Cite as

Complementary and alternative therapies among very long-term breast cancer survivors

Epidemiology

Abstract

Breast cancer patients may have different complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage rates and may turn to CAM for different reasons than healthy adults. CAM has mostly been studied in recently diagnosed women; no studies have included survivors 10 years post-diagnosis. We examined very long-term breast cancer survivors to determine whether CAM users had dissimilar patterns of association with survivorship factors. Interviews of 374 breast cancer case patients from a population-based case–control breast cancer study of young women from Los Angeles County, California, during the 1980s occurred at follow-up; 371 patients with complete information were included. CAM represented 28 herbal remedies. Quality-of-life originated from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36). Higher rates of CAM (59%) usage occurred compared to nationwide estimates. CAM users resembled non-users on follow-up age, exercise, original disease, treatment, smoking, body-mass index, alcohol, and fear of recurrence. CAM users had a higher prevalence of medical co-morbidities (P = 0.0005), and scored significantly lower on the SF-36 emotional well-being subscale than non-CAM users (P = 0.01). CAM users and non-users did not differ on the SF-36 physical sub-scale. Very long-term breast cancer survivors who use CAM may have poorer emotional functioning and more medical problems than non-users.

Keywords

Breast neoplasms Complementary therapies Survivors 

Abbreviations

CAM

Complementary and alternative medicine

QOL

Quality-of-life

SF-36

Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 questionnaire

NHIS

National health interview survey

MCS

Mental component summary scale

PCS

Physical component summary scale

MET

Metabolic equivalent energy expenditure

OR

Odds ratio

References

  1. 1.
    Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL (2004) Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data from Vital Health Stat 343:1–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cassileth BR, Deng G (2004) Complementary and alternative therapies for cancer. Oncologist 9:80–89. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.9-1-80 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myers CD, Jacobsen PB, Huang Y, Frost MH, Patten CA, Cerhan JR et al (2008) Familial and perceived risk of breast cancer in relation to use of complementary medicine. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:1527–1534. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0028 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boon HS, Olatunde F, Zick SM (2007) Trends in complementary and alternative medicine use by breast cancer survivors: comparing survey data from 1998 and 2005. BMC Womens Health 7(4):1–7Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matthews AK, Sellergren SA, Huo D, List M, Fleming G (2007) Complementary and alternative medicine use among breast cancer survivors. J Altern Complement Med 13:555–562. doi:10.1089/acm.2007.03-9040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buettner C, Kroenke CH, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Eisenberg DM, Holmes MD (2006) Correlates of use of different types of complementary and alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in the nurses’ health study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:219–227. doi:10.1007/s10549-006-9239-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim S-G, Park E-C, Park J-H, Hahn M-I, Lim J-H, Choi K-S (2007) Initiation and discontinuation of complementary therapy among cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 25:5267–5274. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9651 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burstein HJ, Gelver S, Guadagnoli E, Weeks JC (1999) Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:1733–1739. doi:10.1056/NEJM199906033402206 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee MM, Lin SS, Wrensch MR, Adler SR, Eisenberg D (2000) Alternative therapies used by women with breast cancer in four ethnic populations. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:42–47. doi:10.1093/jnci/92.1.42 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Hedderson MM, Schwartz SM, Standish LJ, Bowen DJ et al (2002) Types of alternative medicine used by patients with breast colon or prostate cancer: predictors, motives, and costs. J Altern Complement Med 8:477–485. doi:10.1089/107555302760253676 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR (2002) Quality-of-life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:39–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernstein L, Henderson BE, Hanisch R, Sullivan-Halley J, Ross RK (1994) Physical exercise activity reduces the risk of breast cancer in young women. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1403–1408. doi:10.1093/jnci/86.18.1403 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ursin G, Ross RK, Sullivan-Halley J, Hanisch R, Henderson BE, Bernstein L (1998) Use of oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer in young women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 50:175–184. doi:10.1023/A:1006037823178 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Enger SM, Ross RK, Henderson BE, Bernstein L (1997) Breast feeding history, pregnancy experience and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 76:118–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mahue-Giangreco M, Ursin G, Sullivan-Halley J, Bernstein L (2003) Induced abortion, miscarriage and breast cancer risk of young women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:209–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kendall AR, Mahue-Giangreco M, Carpenter CL, Ganz PA, Bernstein L (2005) Influence of exercise activity on quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 14:361–371. doi:10.1007/s11136-004-1468-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ware JE, Sherbopurne CD (1992) The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36): I conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM (1993) The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 2:217–227. doi:10.1002/hec.4730020305 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ware JE, Kosinski M (1994) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. The Health Institute, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Baylis MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A (1995) Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 33:AS264–AS279. doi:10.1097/00005650-199501001-00005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE (1994) Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 32:551–567. doi:10.1097/00005650-199406000-00002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ganz PA, Greendale GA, Petersen L, Kahn B, Bower JE (2003) Breast cancer in younger women: reproductive and late health effects of treatment. J Clin Oncol 21:4184–4193. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.04.196 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE (1998) Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality-of-life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 16:501–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Bryant H (1998) The lifetime total physical activity questionnaire: development and reliability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:266–274. doi:10.1097/00005768-199802000-00015 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon A, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF et al (1993) Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:71–80. doi:10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Myint PK, Surtees PG, Wainwright NWJ, Luben RN, Welch AA, Bingham SA et al (2007) Physical health-related quality-of-life predicts stroke in the EPIC-Norfolk. Neurology 69:2243–2248. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000296010.21252.78 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Statistical Analysis System (2003) SAS Statistics Software, version 9.1.3Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goldstein MS, Lee JH, Ballard-Barbash R, Brown ER (2008) The use and perceived benefit of complementary and alternative medicine among Californians with cancer. Psychooncology 17:19–25. doi:10.1002/pon.1193 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goldstein MS, Brown ER, Ballard-Barbash R, Morgenstern H, Bastani R, Lee J, Gatto N, Ambs A (2005) The use of complementary and alternative medicine among California adults with and without cancer. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2:557–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barry D (1996) Differential recall bias and spurious associations in case–control studies. Stat Med 15:2603–2616. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961215)15:23<2603::AID-SIM371>3.0.CO;2-GPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Human Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and School of Public HealthUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Cancer EtiologyCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer CenterDuarteUSA

Personalised recommendations