Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 53–68 | Cite as

The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

  • Robin L. Jones
  • Janine Salter
  • Roger A’Hern
  • Ash Nerurkar
  • Marina Parton
  • Jorge S. Reis-Filho
  • Ian E. Smith
  • Mitchell DowsettEmail author
Preclinical Study

Abstract

Purpose To compare the prognostic significance of proliferation, as assessed by Ki67 expression, in breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective search of a prospectively maintained clinical database was performed to identify patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital. The expression of Ki67 was assessed using immunohistochemistry in pre-therapy core-needle biopsy and post-therapy surgical excision specimens. The following factors were considered pre- and post-chemotherapy for their relationship with relapse-free and overall survival: age, menstrual status, T and N stage, pre-therapy operability, Ki67, ER, PgR, HER2, grade, histological subtype, vascular invasion, clinical response, chemotherapy regimen, type of surgery performed, adjuvant therapy, pathological tumour size and nodal involvement. Results In a matched cohort of 103 patients, on multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival, post-therapy Ki67 was the only significant independent prognostic factor. On multivariate analysis for overall survival, both pre- and excision Ki67 were significant independent predictors but the latter showed a stronger prognostic impact. The highest and lowest tertiles of excision Ki67 had different prognosis for both 5-year relapse-free (27% vs. 77%) and overall (39% and 93%) survival. In a cohort of 284 patients with only excision samples, post-therapy Ki67 was a significant independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Post-chemotherapy Ki67 is a strong predictor of outcome for patients not achieving a pathological complete response.

Keywords

Breast cancer Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Post-therapy proliferation 

References

  1. 1.
    Jones RL, Smith IE (2006) Neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: opportunities to assess tumour response. Lancet Oncol 7:869–874. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70906-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Urruticoechea A, Smith IE, Dowsett M (2005) Proliferation marker Ki-67 in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7212–7220. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.501 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro G Jr et al (2007) Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12, 155 patients. Br J Cancer 96:1504–1513. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603756 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H (1984) Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 133:1710–1715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Querzoli P, Albonico G, Ferretti S et al (1996) MIB-1 proliferative activity in invasive breast cancer measured by image analysis. J Clin Pathol 49:926–930. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.11.926 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Archer CD, Parton M, Smith IE et al (2003) Early changes in apoptosis and proliferation following primary chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1035–1041. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601173 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis PA, Smith IE, Detre S et al (1998) Reduced apoptosis and proliferation and increased Bcl-2 in residual breast cancer following preoperative chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 48:107–116. doi: 10.1023/A:1005933815809 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR et al (2007) Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:167–170. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk020 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00229.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee J, Im YH, Lee SH et al (2008) Evaluation of ER and Ki-67 proliferation index as prognostic factors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/docetaxel for locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 61:569–577. doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0506-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takada M, Kataoka A, Toi M et al (2004) A close association between alteration in growth kinetics by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome in primary breast cancer. Int J Oncol 25:397–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Billgren AM, Rutqvist LE, Tani E, Wilking N, Fornander T, Skoog L (1999) Proliferating fraction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of primary breast cancer in relation to objective local response and relapse-free survival. Acta Oncol 38:597–601. doi: 10.1080/028418699431186 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osborne CR KL, Xie X-J, Ashfaq R, Bian A, Tripathy D (2006) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for basal-like breast cancer cohort: clinical and pathological outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(1):S53Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Colleoni M, Viale G, Zahrieh D et al (2004) Chemotherapy is more effective in patients with breast cancer not expressing steroid hormone receptors: a study of preoperative treatment. Clin Cancer Res 10:6622–6628. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0380 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A et al (2001) Relationship between tumour shrinkage and reduction in Ki67 expression after primary chemotherapy in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer 85:1106–1112. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2048 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Penault-Llorca F, Cayre A, Bouchet Mishellany F et al (2003) Induction chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Int J Oncol 22:1319–1325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faneyte IF, Schrama JG, Peterse JL, Remijnse PL, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ (2003) Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Br J Cancer 88:406–412. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600749 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneeweiss A, Katretchko J, Sinn HP et al (2004) Only grading has independent impact on breast cancer survival after adjustment for pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy. Anticancer Drugs 15:127–135. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200402000-00005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daidone MG, Veneroni S, Benini E et al (1999) Biological markers as indicators of response to primary and adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 84:580–586. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991222)84:6≤580::AID-IJC7≥3.0.CO;2-WGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A et al (1996) Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on Ki67 labelling index, c-erbB-2 expression and steroid hormone receptor status in human breast tumours. Anticancer Res 16:3105–3110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Honkoop AH, van Diest PJ, de Jong JS et al (1998) Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 77:621–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vincent-Salomon A, Rousseau A, Jouve M et al (2004) Proliferation markers predictive of the pathological response and disease outcome of patients with breast carcinomas treated by anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 40:1502–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li X, Lewis MT, Huang J et al (2008) Intrinsic resistance of tumorigenic breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:672–679. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn123 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin L. Jones
    • 1
  • Janine Salter
    • 1
  • Roger A’Hern
    • 2
  • Ash Nerurkar
    • 3
  • Marina Parton
    • 3
  • Jorge S. Reis-Filho
    • 4
  • Ian E. Smith
    • 3
  • Mitchell Dowsett
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Academic Department of BiochemistryRoyal Marsden HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics UnitSutton, SurreyUK
  3. 3.Breast UnitRoyal Marsden HospitalLondonUK
  4. 4.Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research CentreInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations