Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The decision-making experience among women diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cancer diagnosis signals entry for many patients into the complex and often bewildering world of cancer care. Understanding the role women prefer and their level of satisfaction with the decision-making process at time of diagnosis will help to inform healthcare professionals how to better support breast cancer patients as they navigate the cancer journey. Logistic regression was used to identify significant factors influencing outcomes in role preferences and satisfaction. A complementary method, principal components analysis was used to explore patterns of co-association between outcomes and their influencing factors. Results showed women tended to adopt cancer decision-making roles similar to those used for general health decision-making. Overall, women preferred a collaborative/active role (40/38%) over a passive role (16%). Satisfaction rates were high with 88.1% of women being satisfied/very satisfied with their cancer treatment choice; 89.7% of women satisfied with their decision-making role and; 83.6% satisfied with the information provided to support their decision. Further research involving cohorts of women diagnosed with more advanced disease and for whom decisional regret may be greater, is needed to further explore the link between preferred decision-making role and satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balneaves LG, Long B (1999) An embedded decisional model of stress and coping: implications for exploring treatment decision making by women with breast cancer. J Adv Nurs 30(6):1321–1331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB (1988) Information decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 27(11):1139–1145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W (1999) Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 282(24):2313–2320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M (2002) Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer 94(7):2076–2080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassileth BR, Heiberger RM, March V, Sutton-Smith K (1980) Information seeking and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92(6):832–836

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J (1996) What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 156:1414–1420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Degner LF, Sloan JA (1992) Decision-making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45(9):941–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carriere KC, O’Neil J, Bilodeau B, Watson P, Mueller B (1997) Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277(18):1485–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield L (1997) Offering choice of surgical treatments to women with breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 30(3):209–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt M, Breen N, Devesa S (1999) Cancer prevalence and survivorship issues. Analyses of the 1992 National health Interview Survey. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1480–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JD, Roberts CS, Cox CE, Rientgen DS, Levine JS, Parsons M (1996) Breast cancer patients’ personality style, age and treatment decision-making. J Surg Oncol 63(3):183–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC (2002) Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol 20(6):1473–1479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Amsterdam, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly B (1986) Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastaglia B, Kristjanson LJ (2001) Factors influencing women’s decisions for choice of surgery for Stage I and Stage II breast cancer in Western Australia. J Adv Nurs 35(6):836–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellink WAM, Dulmen AM, Wiggens T, Spreeuwenberg PMM, Eggermont AMM, Bensing JM (2003) Cancer patients seeking a second surgical opinion: results of a study on motives, needs and expectations. J Clin Oncol 21:1492–1497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 15(1):25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrisek AC, Laliberte LL, Allen SM, Mor V (1997) The treatment decision-making process: age differences in a sample of women recently diagnosed with non-recurrent early stage breast cancer. Gerontologist 37(5):598–608

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sainio C, Eriksson E, Lauri S (2001) Patient participation in decision-making about care. Cancer Nurs 24(3):172–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scarth H, Cantin J, Levine M (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: mastectomy or lumpectomy? The choice of operation for clinical stages I & II breast cancer (summary of the 2002 update). CMAJ 167(2):154–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schou I, Ekeberg O, Ruland CM, Karesen R (2002) Do women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and consulting surgeon asses decision-making equally? Breast 11(5):434–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siminoff LA, Fetting JH, Abeloff MD (1989) Doctor–patient communication about breast cancer adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 7(9):1192–1200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L (2002) A tutorial on principal components analysis

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation: Atlantic Chapter for funding support to undertake the study and the Surveillance and Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Care Nova Scotia for analytic and administrative support. Further, our sincere appreciation to all the Nova Scotia breast cancer patients and survivors who participated—without them this study would not have taken place.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda Sabo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabo, B., St-Jacques, N. & Rayson, D. The decision-making experience among women diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 102, 51–59 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9309-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9309-6

Keywords

Navigation