Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can an instruction video or palpation aid improve the effectiveness of breast self-examination in detecting tumors? An experimental study

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Although large randomized trials have not shown benefits for breast self-examination (BSE), many organizations still endorse the practice. This study aimed to determine whether an instruction video or palpation aid improved the effectiveness of BSE.

Methods

A total of 100 volunteers (50 men and 50 women) with no previous experience of BSE and/or clinical breast palpation were randomly assigned to the following intervention: instruction video seen versus not seen and use of palpation aids versus aids not used. Participants completed psychological trait and previous knowledge questionnaires before the intervention and/or breast examination. Examination was carried out on 24 different sized silicone breast forms, into 20 of which had been inserted tumor equivalents measuring 0.8–3.0 cm in diameter. The dependent variable was the rate of accurate tumor detection – the mean sum of correct positive hits (CPH) – defined as tumors detected within 20 s. Mean CPH values were then analyzed in relation to the interventions and other variables including gender and psychological measures (ANOVA and COVAR).

Results

Neither the instruction video nor interaction effects between gender and the instruction video influenced the mean CPH value. Furthermore, the palpation aid was strongly and significantly associated with a reduced detection (p=0.00003).

Conclusion

Using an instruction video or palpation aid did not improve the effectiveness of breast examination in detecting tumors – a finding which supports results from large randomized studies. It is difficult to understand why BSE is still promoted by various groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vahabi M, Breast cancer screening methods: a review of the evidenceHealth Care Women Int 24: 773–793, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey BJ, Miller AB, Baines CJ, Corey PN, Effect of breast self-examination techniques on the risk of death from breast cancerCMAJ157: 1205–1212, 1997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coates RJ, Ushler RJ, Brogan DJ, Gammon MD, Malone KE, Swanson CA, Flagg EW, Brinton LA, Patterns and predictors of the breast cancer detection methods in women under 45 years of age (United States)Cancer Causes Control 12: 431–442, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koster JP, Gotzsche PC, Regular self-examination or clinical examinations for early detection of breast cancerCochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD003373, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hackshaw AK, Paul EA, Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: a meta-analysisBr J Cancer 88: 1047–1053, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Self SG, Allison CJ, Tao Y, Mahloch J, Ray R, Qin Q, Presley R, Porter P, Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: methodology and preliminary resultsJ Natl Cancer Inst 89: 355–365, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray R, Wang WW, Allison CJ, Chen FL, Porter P, Hu YW, Zhao GL, Pan LD, Li W, Wu C, Coriaty Z, Evans I, Lin MG, Stalsberg H, Self SG, Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final resultsJ Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1445–1457, 2002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Semiglazov VF, Moiseyenko VM, Bavli JL Migmanova NSh, Seleznyov NK, Poppva RT, Ivanova OA, Orlov AA, Chagunava OA, Barash NJ, The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad) Eur J Epidemiol 8: 498–502, 1992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmberg L, Ekbom A, Calle E, Mokdad A, Byers T, Breast cancer mortality in relation to self-reported use of breast self-examinationBreast Cancer Res Treat 43: 137–140, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Newcomb PA, Weiss NS, Storer BE, Scholes D, Young BE, Voigt LF, Breast self-examination in relation to the occurrence of advanced breast cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst 83: 260–265, 1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Green BB, Taplin SH, Breast cancer screening controversiesJ Am Board Fam Pract 16: 233–241, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carver CS, White TL, Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scalesJ Pers Soc Psychol 67: 319–333, 1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stroebel A., Beaducel A. Debner S. Brocke B, Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und WhiteZeitschr Different Diagn Psychol 22: 216–227, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. von Georgi R, Beckmann D, Selbstkonzept-InventarVerlag Hans Huber Bern Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle 2004

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCance KL, Mooney KH, Smith KR, Field R, Validity and reliability of a breast cancer knowledge testAm J Prev Med 6: 93–98, 1990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Janda M, Obermair A, Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Vutuc C, Austrian women’s attitudes towards and knowledge of breast self-examinationJ Cancer Educ 15: 91–94, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Janda M, Stanek C, Newman B, Obermair A, Trimmel M, Impact of videotaped information on frequency and confidence of breast self-examinationBreast Cancer Res Treat 73: 37–43, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutledge DN, Barsevick A, Knobf MT, Bookbinder M, Breast cancer detection: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of women from PennsylvaniaOncol Nurs Forum 28: 1032–1040, 2001

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Erblich J, Bovbjerg DH, Valdimarsdottir HB, Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examinationJ Behav Med 23: 277–292, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wood RY, Duffy ME, Morris SJ, Carnes JE, The effect of an educational intervention on promoting breast self-examination in older African American and Caucasian womenOncol Nurs Forum 29: 1081–1090, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yelland MJ, Rice DE, Ward AE, Bain C, Siskind V, Schofield F, A profile of Australian women practicing breast self-examinationAsia Pac J Public Health 5: 307–312, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Olson RL, Mitchell ES, Self-confidence as a critical factor in breast self-examinationJ Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 18: 476–481, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nettles-Carlson B, Field ML, Friedman BJ, Smith LS, Effectiveness of teaching breast self examination during office visitsRes Nurs Health 11: 41–50, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Champion VL, Effect of knowledge, teaching method, confidence and social influence on breast self-examination behaviorImage J Nurs Sch 21: 76–80, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stefanek ME, Wilcox P, Huelskamp AM, Breast self-examination proficiency and training effects: women at increased risk of breast cancerCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1: 591–596, 1992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leight SB, Leslie NS, Development of a competency-based curriculum for training women in breast self-examination skillsJ Am Acad Nurse Pract 10: 297–302, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Murali ME, Crabtree K, Comparison of two breast self-examination palpation techniquesCancer Nurs 15: 276–282, 1992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacob TC, Penn NE, Giebink J, Bastien R, A comparison of breast self-examination and clinical examinationJ Natl Med Assoc 86: 40–45 1994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bobo JK, Lee NC, Thames SF, Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 971–976, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson BO, Braun S, Lim S, Smith RA, Taplin S, Thomas DB for the Global Summit Early Detection panel: early detection of breast cancer in countries with limited resourcesBreast J 9(Suppl. 2): S51–S59, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Harirchi I, Ghaemmaghami F, Karbakhsh M, Moghimi R, Mazaherie H., Patient delay in women presenting with advanced breast cancer: an Iranian studyPublic Health 119: 885–891, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the Amoena Corporation (Raubling, Germany), especially Mr Wild, for providing the breast forms and to the Sentida Corporation (Preston, WA) for supplying the palpation aids.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Münstedt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Georgi, R., Thele, F., Hackethal, A. et al. Can an instruction video or palpation aid improve the effectiveness of breast self-examination in detecting tumors? An experimental study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97, 167–172 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9106-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9106-7

Keywords

Navigation