Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of the Head Model Conductor on the Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Potentials

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of EEG source analysis reconstruction improves when a realistic head volume conductor is modeled. In this study we investigated how the progressively more complex head representations influence the spatial localization of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs). Fourteen young-adult participants with normal hearing performed the AEP task. Individualized head models were obtained from structural MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging scans collected in a separate session. AEPs were elicited by 1 k Hz and 4 k Hz tone bursts during a passive-listening tetanizing paradigm. We compared the amplitude of the N1 and P2 components before and after 4 min of tetanic-stimulation with 1 k Hz sounds. Current density reconstruction values of both components were investigated in the primary auditory cortex and adjacent areas. Furthermore, we compared the signal topography and magnitude obtained with 10 different head models on the EEG forward solution. Starting from the simplest model (scalp, skull, brain), we investigated the influence of modeling the CSF, distinguishing between GM and WM conductors, and including anisotropic WM values. We localized the activity of AEPs within the primary auditory cortex, but not in adjacent areas. The inclusion of the CSF compartment had the strongest influence on the source reconstruction, whereas white matter anisotropy led to a smaller improvement. We conclude that individualized realistic head models provide the best solution for the forward solution when modeling the CSF conductor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institute of Health under award numbers R01-HD18942 and K99-HD102566.

Funding

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) R01-HD18942 and K99-HD102566.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Conte.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no personal or institutional conflict of interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Leon Deouell.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2297 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 619 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conte, S., Richards, J.E. The Influence of the Head Model Conductor on the Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Potentials. Brain Topogr 34, 793–812 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-021-00871-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-021-00871-z

Keywords

Navigation