Abstract
A recent review of the neuroimaging literature on emotional similarity brought to light some of the drawbacks of the latest studies. The authors discussed important methodological considerations for future work in this field, which predominantly involved stimulus selection. In general, we feel that their suggestions are valuable, but we hold that, depending on the specific scientific question(s) under investigation (e.g., individual differences), some of the suggestions may not meaningfully contribute to the scope of the study and might even introduce artificial constraints that could reduce the researchers’ ability to discover effects of interest. Here we indicate one way to potentially circumvent such stimulus-related issues in neuroimaging studies and furthermore present a few scenarios in which additional controlling of the stimulus set may not be necessary or possible when investigating individual differences. This commentary serves to supplement the important methodological points raised by the authors by providing a caveat in potentially applying such points to all future experiments investigating emotional similarity.
References
Brooks JA, Chikazoe J, Sadato N, Freeman JB (2019) The neural representation of facial-emotion categories reflects conceptual structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:15861–15870. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816408116
Carretié L, Tapia M, López-Martín S, Albert J (2019) EmoMadrid: an emotional pictures database for affect research. Motiv Emot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09780-y
Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Bandettini P (2008) Representational similarity analysis—connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci 2:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008
Levine SM, Alahäivälä ALI, Wechsler TF et al (2020) Linking personality traits to individual differences in affective spaces. Front Psychol 11:448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00448
Levine SM, Wackerle A, Rupprecht R, Schwarzbach JV (2018) The neural representation of an individualized relational affective space. Neuropsychologia 120:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.008
Marchewka A, Żurawski Ł, Jednoróg K, Grabowska A (2014) The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): Introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behav Res Methods 46:596–610. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1
Riberto M, Pobric G, Talmi D (2019) The emotional facet of subjective and neural indices of similarity. Brain Topogr 32:956–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00743-7
Tucciarelli R, Wurm M, Baccolo E, Lingnau A (2019) The representational space of observed actions. Elife 8. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47686
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levine, S.M., Wackerle, A. Investigating Emotional Similarity: A Comment on Riberto, Pobric, and Talmi (2019). Brain Topogr 33, 285–287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-020-00766-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-020-00766-5