Electroencephalogram (EEG) has evolved to be a well-established tool for imaging brain activity. This progress is mainly due to the development of high-resolution (HR) EEG methods. One class of HR-EEG is the cortical potential imaging (CPI), which aims to estimate the potential distribution on the cortical surface, which is much more informative than EEG. Even though these methods exhibit good performance, most of them have inherent inaccuracies that originate from their operating principles that constrain the solution or require a complex calculation process. The back-projection CPI (BP-CPI) method is relatively new and has the advantage of being constraint-free and computation inexpensive. The method has shown relatively good accuracy, which is necessary to become a clinical tool. However, better performance must be achieved. In the present study, two improvements are proposed. Both are embedded as adjacent stages to the BP-CPI and are based on the multi-resolution optimization approach (MR-CPI). A series of Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to examine the characteristics of the proposed improvements. Additional tests were done, including different EEG noise levels and variation in electrode-numbers. The results showed highly accurate cortical potential estimations, with a reduction in estimation error by a factor of 3.75 relative to the simple BP-CPI estimation error. We also validated these results with true EEG data. Analyzing these EEGs, we have demonstrated the MR-CPI competence to correctly localize cortical activations in a real environment. The MR-CPI methods were shown to be reliable for estimating cortical potentials, enabling researchers to obtain fast and robust high-resolution EEGs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Ahissar E, Nagarajan S, Ahissar M, Protopapas A, Mahncke H, Merzenich MM (2001) Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(23):13367–13372
Babiloni C, Frisoni G, Steriade M, Bresciani L, Binetti G, Del Percio C, Geroldi C, Miniussi C, Nobili F, Rodriguez G et al (2006) Frontal white matter volume and delta eeg sources negatively correlate in awake subjects with mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 117(5):1113–1129
Babiloni F, Carducci F, Babiloni C, Urbano A (1998) Improved realistic laplacian estimate of highly-sampled eeg potentials by regularization techniques. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106(4):336–343
Bar M, Kassam KS, Ghuman AS, Boshyan J, Schmid AM, Dale AM, Hämäläinen MS, Marinkovic K, Schacter DL, Rosen BR et al (2006) Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(2):449–454
Baussard A, Miller EL, Lesselier D (2004) Adaptive multiscale reconstruction of buried objects. Inverse Probl 20(6):S1
Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O (2013) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer, Berlin
Benedetti M, Lesselier D, Lambert M, Massa A (2008) A multi-resolution technique based on shape optimization for the reconstruction of homogeneous dielectric objects. Inverse Probl 25(1):015009
Brodbeck V, Spinelli L, Lascano AM, Wissmeier M, Vargas MI, Vulliemoz S, Pollo C, Schaller K, Michel CM, Seeck M (2011) Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients. Brain 134(10):2887–2897
Céa J, Garreau S, Guillaume P, Masmoudi M (2000) The shape and topological optimizations connection. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 188(4):713–726
David O, Kiebel SJ, Harrison LM, Mattout J, Kilner JM, Friston KJ (2006) Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in eeg and meg. NeuroImage 30(4):1255–1272
Ding L, He B (2008) Sparse source imaging in electroencephalography with accurate field modeling. Hum Brain Mapp 29(9):1053–1067
Edelman BJ, Baxter B, He B (2016) Eeg source imaging enhances the decoding of complex right-hand motor imagery tasks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63(1):4–14
Feijóo GR, Oberai AA, Pinsky PM (2003) An application of shape optimization in the solution of inverse acoustic scattering problems. Inverse Probl 20(1):199
Franceries X, Chauveau N, Sors A, Masquere M, Celsis P (2012) Conjugate gradient method applied to cortical imaging in eeg/erp. In: Petrova R (ed) Finite volume method-powerful means of engineering design. InTech, Rijeka
Fuchs M, Kastner J, Wagner M, Hawes S, Ebersole JS (2002) A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clin Neurophysiol 113(5):702–712
Gavit L, Baillet S, Mangin JF, Pescatore J, Garnero L (2001) A multiresolution framework to meg/eeg source imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48(10):1080–1087
Gevins A, Le J, Brickett P, Reutter B, Desmond J (1991) Seeing through the skull: advanced eegs use mris to accurately measure cortical activity from the scalp. Brain Topogr 4(2):125–131
Gevins A, Le J, Martin NK, Brickett P, Desmond J, Reutter B (1994) High resolution eeg: 124-channel recording, spatial deblurring and mri integration methods. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90(5):337–358
Grippo L, Lampariello F, Lucidi S (1986) A nonmonotone line search technique for newtons method. SIAM J Numer Analy 23(4):707–716
Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ (1994) Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 32(1):35–42
Haor D, Shavit R, Shapiro M, Geva A (2017) Back-projection cortical potential imaging: theory and results. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(7):1583–1595
He B, Zhang X, Lian J, Sasaki H, Wu D, Towle V (2002) Boundary element method-based cortical potential imaging of somatosensory evoked potentials using subjects’ magnetic resonance images. NeuroImage 16(3):564–576
Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L (1998) Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(3):781–787
Hopf JM, Vogel E, Woodman G, Heinze HJ, Luck SJ (2002) Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. J Neurophysiol 88(4):2088–2095
Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs
Johnson B, Xie Z (2011) Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi-scale approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66(4):473–483
Jousmäki V (2000) Tracking functions of cortical networks on a millisecond timescale. Neural Netw 13(8):883–889
Komssi S, Huttunen J, Aronen HJ, Ilmoniemi R (2004) Eeg minimum-norm estimation compared with meg dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at s1. Clin Neurophysiol 115(3):534–542
Lai Y, Zhang X, van Drongelen W, Korhman M, Hecox K, Ni Y, He B (2011) Noninvasive cortical imaging of epileptiform activities from interictal spikes in pediatric patients. Neuroimage 54(1):244–252
Lantz G, De Peralta RG, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel C (2003) Epileptic source localization with high density eeg: how many electrodes are needed? Clin Neurophysiol 114(1):63–69
Li J, Liu H, Zou J (2008) Multilevel linear sampling method for inverse scattering problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 30(3):1228–1250
Luck SJ (2014) An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT press, Cambridge
Ma X, Guan X (2005) Loreta-contracting algorithm for solving eeg source distribution problems. COMPEL-Int J Comput Math Electr Electron Eng 24(3):821–828
McNay D, Michielssen E, Rogers R, Taylor S, Akhtari M, Sutherling W (1996) Multiple source localization using genetic algorithms. J Neurosci Methods 64(2):163–172
Miller EL, Willsky AS (1996) A multiscale, statistically based inversion scheme for linearized inverse scattering problems. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 34(2):346–357
Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D (1994) Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18(1):49–65
Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Koukkou M, Kochi K, Anderer P, Saletu B, Tanaka H, Hirata K, John ER, Prichep L et al (2011) Assessing interactions in the brain with exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 369(1952):3768–3784
Roy AV, Jamison KW, He S, Engel SA, He B (2017) Deactivation in the posterior mid-cingulate cortex reflects perceptual transitions during binocular rivalry: evidence from simultaneous eeg-fmri. NeuroImage 152:1–11
Sergent C, Baillet S, Dehaene S (2005) Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nat Neurosci 8(10):1391
Sohrabpour A, Lu Y, Kankirawatana P, Blount J, Kim H, He B (2015) Effect of eeg electrode number on epileptic source localization in pediatric patients. Clin Neurophysiol 126(3):472–480
Sohrabpour A, Lu Y, Worrell G, He B (2016) Imaging brain source extent from eeg/meg by means of an iteratively reweighted edge sparsity minimization (ires) strategy. NeuroImage 142:27–42
Stern Y, Reches A, Geva AB (2016) Brain network activation analysis utilizing spatiotemporal features for event related potentials classification. Front Comput Neurosci 10:137
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in spm using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the mni mri single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15(1):273–289
Uutela K, Hamalainen M, Salmelin R (1998) Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45(6):716–723
Van Uitert R, Johnson C, Zhukov L (2004) Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51(12):2129–2137
Wang JZ, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L (1992) Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39(7):665–675
Yamashita Y (1982) Theoretical studies on the inverse problem in electrocardiography and the uniqueness of the solution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 11:719–725
Zhu M, Zhang W, Dickens DL, Ding L (2014) Reconstructing spatially extended brain sources via enforcing multiple transform sparseness. NeuroImage 86:280–293
This work was supported (in part) by Grant from the MAGNET program of the Israeli OCS and by ElMindA Ltd.
Handling Editor: Bin He.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Haor, D., Joffe, R., Shavit, R. et al. Improved Back-Projection Cortical Potential Imaging by Multi-resolution Optimization Technique. Brain Topogr 32, 66–79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0668-1
- Cortical potential imaging
- Forward solution