Skip to main content

Disparate Connectivity for Structural and Functional Networks is Revealed When Physical Location of the Connected Nodes is Considered

Abstract

Macroscopic brain networks have been widely described with the manifold of metrics available using graph theory. However, most analyses do not incorporate information about the physical position of network nodes. Here, we provide a multimodal macroscopic network characterization while considering the physical positions of nodes. To do so, we examined anatomical and functional macroscopic brain networks in a sample of twenty healthy subjects. Anatomical networks are obtained with a graph based tractography algorithm from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images (DW-MRI). Anatomical connections identified via DW-MRI provided probabilistic constraints for determining the connectedness of 90 different brain areas. Functional networks are derived from temporal linear correlations between blood-oxygenation level-dependent signals derived from the same brain areas. Rentian Scaling analysis, a technique adapted from very-large-scale integration circuits analyses, shows that functional networks are more random and less optimized than the anatomical networks. We also provide a new metric that allows quantifying the global connectivity arrangements for both structural and functional networks. While the functional networks show a higher contribution of inter-hemispheric connections, the anatomical networks highest connections are identified in a dorsal–ventral arrangement. These results indicate that anatomical and functional networks present different connectivity organizations that can only be identified when the physical locations of the nodes are included in the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

FC:

Functional connectivity

AC:

Anatomical connectivity

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

DW-MRI:

Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging

BOLD:

Blood-oxygenation level-dependent

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

rsfMRI:

Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging

TR:

Repetition time

TE:

Echo time

FoV:

Field of view

GM:

Grey matter

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

WM:

White matter

ACP:

Anatomical connection probability

tRS:

Topological rentian scaling

pRS:

Physical rentian scaling

mRS:

Minimum rentian scaling

rtRE:

Random topological rentian scaling

rpRE:

Random physical rentian scaling

IH:

Inter-hemispheric

AP:

Anterior–posterior

DV:

Dorsal–ventral

ROI:

Region of interest

EEG:

Electroencephalography

MEG:

Magnetoencephalography

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the research participants for their participation in this study. We also thank Yasser Iturria-Medina for providing the tractography scripts. We also thank Frank G. Hillary and Nazareth P. Castellanos for fruitful comments on the manuscript. José Á. Pineda-Pardo was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education through the National Program FPU (grant number AP2010-1317).

Disclosure

No competing financial interests exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Ángel Pineda-Pardo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pineda-Pardo, J.Á., Martínez, K., Solana, A.B. et al. Disparate Connectivity for Structural and Functional Networks is Revealed When Physical Location of the Connected Nodes is Considered. Brain Topogr 28, 187–196 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0393-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0393-3

Keywords