Scalp Current Density Mapping in the Analysis of Mismatch Negativity Paradigms
- 599 Downloads
MMN oddball paradigms are frequently used to assess auditory (dys)functions in clinical populations, or the influence of various factors (such as drugs and alcohol) on auditory processing. A widely used procedure is to compare the MMN responses between two groups of subjects (e.g. patients vs controls), or between experimental conditions in the same group. To correctly interpret these comparisons, it is important to take into account the multiple brain generators that produce the MMN response. To disentangle the different components of the MMN, we describe the advantages of scalp current density (SCD)—or surface Laplacian—computation for ERP analysis. We provide a short conceptual and mathematical description of SCDs, describe their properties, and illustrate with examples from published studies how they can benefit MMN analysis. We conclude with practical tips on how to correctly use and interpret SCDs in this context.
KeywordsMismatch negativity Scalp current density ERP mapping
- Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Bonmassar G, Dale AM, Ilmoniemi RJ, Levänen S, Lin FH, May P, Melcher J, Stufflebeam S, Tiitinen H, Belliveau JW (2004) Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(17):6809–6814PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kayser J, Tenke CE, Kroppmann CJ, Fekri S, Alschuler DM, Gates NA, Gil R, Harkavy-Friedman JM, Jarskog LF, Bruder GE (2010) Current source density (CSD) old/new effects during recognition memory for words and faces in schizophrenia and in healthy adults. Int J Psychophysiol 75(2):194–210PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mangun GR, Hillyard SA, Luck SJ (1993) Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In: Meyer D, Kornblum S (eds) Attention and performance XIV. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 219–243Google Scholar
- Nunez PL (1981) Electric fields of the brain. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 196–203Google Scholar