Brain Topography

, Volume 24, Issue 3–4, pp 271–278 | Cite as

Neuroimaging Evidence for Top-Down Maturation of Selective Auditory Attention

  • Anthony T. Herdman
Original Paper


This study investigated maturational differences of selective auditory attention effects on transient evoked responses and 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses between children and adults. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was recorded from children and adults performing a task where they attended to 40-Hz amplitude-modulated (AM) tones of 1,200 Hz while ignoring 40-Hz AM tones of 800 Hz. By using standard dipole-modeling procedures, the N1m of the transient evoked fields and the 40-Hz ASSRs were localized to secondary and primary auditory cortices, respectively. Source waveforms for the transient evoked fields and ASSRs were reconstructed at these locations and compared between attended and unattended tones. Source waveforms revealed attention enhances the sustained negativity of the transient evoked responses in both adults and children around 250 and 400 ms. ASSRs were also found to be enhanced within this time range but only for adults. The results provide evidence for a limited role of attention modification of the 40-Hz ASSRs in children around the age of 12 years old. Because ASSRs are generated in a lower auditory processing stage as compared to the transient auditory evoked responses, findings from the present study could indicate that the maturation of attention progresses in top-to-bottom manner. These findings fit with the notion that as a person gains sensory experience selective gating of relevant from irrelevant information likely occurs at earlier and earlier processing levels in order to become more automatic and efficient.


Auditory evoked responses Auditory steady-state responses Magnetoencephalography Development 



Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Human Early Learning Partnership, and Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research supported this project.


  1. Berman S, Friedman D (1995) The development of selective attention as reflected by event-related brain potentials. J Exp Child Psychol 59:1–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosnyak DJ, Eaton RA, Roberts LE (2004) Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified when non-musicians are trained at pitch discrimination with 40 Hz amplitude modulated tones. Cereb Cortex 14:1088–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadbent DE (1958) Perception and communication. Pergamon, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheyne D, Bakhtazad L, Gaetz W (2006) Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event-related beamforming approach. Hum Brain Mapp 27:213–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Angiulli A, Herdman A, Stapells D, Hertzman C (2008) Children’s event-related potentials of auditory selective attention vary with their socioeconomic status. Neuropsychology 22:293–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyle A (1973) Listening to distraction: a developmental study of selective attention. J Exp Child Psychol 15:100–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff PJ (1981) A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2643–2647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gomes H, Molholm S, Christodoulou C, Ritter W, Cowan N (2000) The development of auditory attention in children. Front Biosci 5:D108–D120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV (1993) Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain: review. Rev Mod Phys 65:413–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen JC, Hillyard SA (1980) Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 49:277–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herdman AT, Wollbrink A, Chau W, Ishii R, Ross B, Pantev C (2003) Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry. Neuroimage 20:995–1005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hillyard SA, Kutas M (1983) Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annu Rev Psychol 34:33–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hillyard SA, Hink RF, Schwent VL, Picton TW (1973) Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182:177–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howell DC (1997) Statistical methods for psychology, 4th edn. Wadsworth Publishing Co., BelmontGoogle Scholar
  15. Lazzouni L, Ross B, Voss P, Lepore F (2010) Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation. Clin Neurophysiol 121:200–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  17. Näätänen R, Michie PT (1979) Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation. Biol Psychol 8:81–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Näätänen R, Gaillard AW, Mantysalo S (1978) Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst) 42:313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norman DA (1968) Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychol Rev 75:522–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pantev C, Elbert T, Makeig S, Hampson S, Eulitz C, Hoke M (1993) Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:389–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pantev C, Roberts LE, Elbert T, Ross B, Wienbruch C (1996) Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 101:62–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Picton TW (2010) Human auditory evoked potentials. Plural Publishing Inc., San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. Picton TW, Taylor MJ (2007) Electrophysiological evaluation of human brain development. Dev Neuropsychol 31:251–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32:3–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross B, Picton TW, Herdman AT, Pantev C (2004) The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol 2004:22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ross B, Hillyard SA, Picton TW (2010) Temporal dynamics of selective attention during dichotic listening. Cereb Cortex 20:1360–1371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwent VL, Snyder E, Hillyard SA (1976) Auditory evoked potentials during multichannel selective listening: role of pitch and localization cues. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2:313–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sexton MA, Geffen G (1979) Development of three strategies of attention in dichotic monitoring. Dev Psychol 15:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stapells DR, Linden D, Suffield JB, Hamel G, Picton TW (1984) Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear 5:105–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stevens C, Lauinger B, Neville H (2009) Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event-related brain potential study. Dev Sci 12:634–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tiitinen H, Sinkkonen J, Reinikainen K, Alho K, Lavikainen J, Näätänen R (1993) Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans. Nature 364:59–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Treisman AM (1969) Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol Rev 76:282–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Woldorff MG, Gallen CC, Hampson SA, Hillyard SA, Pantev C, Sobel D, Bloom FE (1993) Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8722–8726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wunderlich JL, Cone-Wesson BK (2006) Maturation of CAEP in infants and young children: a review. Hear Res 212:212–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations