Abstract
There is a rich history of studying coherent structures in the atmospheric boundary layer through the use of spatial correlations between wall shear stress and elevated velocity measurements. This work has primarily focused on neutral and convective boundary layers, while structures in the stable boundary layer (SBL) have received less attention. We use direct numerical simulations (DNSs) of turbulent channel flow across a range of static stabilities to examine the inclination angles of turbulent structures in the SBL. Angles are inferred not only from wall shear stress and velocity correlations, but also from correlations between the wall buoyancy flux and buoyancy. Results indicate that structures in the SBL have a smaller angle than those under neutral conditions, and that the difference is enhanced with increasing stratification. Specifically, stratification across the range of considered simulations decreases the angles from the neutral case by \(<1^\circ \) near the surface and by \(\sim 1\)–\(3^\circ \) at the top of the logarithmic region. Additionally, the angles of buoyancy structures are larger than those inferred from momentum by \(\sim 3^\circ \) throughout the entire depth of this layer. Further, angles increase with height until leveling off near the top of the logarithmic region, which may be the result of local z-less stratification based on analysis of the Richardson number and normalized standard deviations. The DNS data are in good agreement with both existing published data and newly reported observations from the AHATS field campaign. Both numerical and observational data exhibit an increase in angle variability with increasing stratification, which seemingly indicates that the variability is related to physical processes of the flow, such as intermittency or laminarization/bursting phenomena. In the future, large-eddy simulation surface boundary conditions will need to better capture this variability to properly represent instantaneous land-surface interactions in the SBL.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian RJ (2007) Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence. Phys Fluids 19(4):041,301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2717527
Antonia RA (1981) Conditional sampling in turbulence measurement. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13(1):131–156. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.13.010181.001023
Basu S, Porté-agel F, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Vinuesa JF, Pahlow M (2006) Revisiting the local scaling hypothesis in stably stratified atmospheric boundary-layer turbulence: an integration of field and laboratory measurements with large-eddy simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119(3):473–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9036-2
Boppe RS, Neu WL, Shuai H (1999) Large-scale motions in the marine atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 92(2):165–183. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1001837729368
Brown GL, Thomas ASW (1977) Large structure in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 20(10):S243-s252. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.861737
Carper MA, Porté-Agel F (2004) The role of coherent structures in subfilter-scale dissipation of turbulence measured in the atmospheric surface layer. J Turbul 5:N40. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-5248/5/1/040
Chauhan K, Hutchins N, Monty J, Marusic I (2013) Structure inclination angles in the convective atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9777-7
Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (2019) Cheyenne: Hpe/sgi ice xa system (climate simulation laboratory. https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX
Fedorovich E, Gibbs JA, Shapiro A (2017) Numerical study of nocturnal low-level jets over gently sloping terrain. J Atmos Sci 74(9):2813–2834. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0013.1
García-Villalba M, del Álamo JC (2011) Turbulence modification by stable stratification in channel flow. Phys Fluids 23(4):045,104–22
Grachev AA, Andreas EL, Fairall CW, Guest PS, Persson POG (2013) The critical Richardson number and limits of applicability of local similarity theory in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(1):51–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9771-0
Heuer WD, Marusic I (2005) Turbulence wall-shear stress sensor for the atmospheric surface layer. Measurement Sci Technol 16(8):1644
Hong J, Kim J, Ishikawa H, Ma Y (2010) Surface layer similarity in the nocturnal boundary layer: the application of Hilbert–Huang transform. Biogeosciences 7(4):1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1271-2010
Kim J, Moin P, Moser R (1987) Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 177:133–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112087000892
Liu HY, Bo TL, Liang YR (2017) The variation of large-scale structure inclination angles in high Reynolds number atmospheric surface layers. Phys Fluids 29(3):035,104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978803
Lotfy ER, Harun Z (2018) Effect of atmospheric boundary layer stability on the inclination angle of turbulence coherent structures. Environ Fluid Mech 18(3):637–659
Mahrt L (1998) Nocturnal boundary-layer regimes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88(2):255–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001171313493
Marusic I, Heuer WDC (2007) Reynolds number invariance of the structure inclination angle in wall turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 99(114):504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.114504
Marusic I, Kunkel GJ, Porté-Agel F (2001) Experimental study of wall boundary conditions for large-eddy simulation. J Fluid Mech 446:309–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112001005924
Mauritsen T, Svensson G (2007) Observations of stably stratified shear-driven atmospheric turbulence at low and high Richardson numbers. J Atmos Sci 64(2):645–655. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3856.1
Monin A, Obukhov A (1954) Turbulent mixing in the atmospheric surface layer. Tr Akad Nauk SSSR Geofiz Inst 24(151):163–187
Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN (1999) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to \(Re_\tau =590\). Phys Fluids 11(4):943–945. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869966
Pahlow M, Parlange MB, Porté-Agel F (2001) On Monin-Obukhov similarity in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99(2):225–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018909000098
Piomelli U, Ferziger J, Moin P, Kim J (1989) New approximate boundary conditions for large eddy simulations of wall-bounded flows. Phys Fluids A: Fluid Dyn 1(6):1061–1068. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857397
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840531
Rajagopalan S, Antonia RA (1979) Some properties of the large structure in a fully developed turbulent duct flow. Phys Fluids 22(4):614–622. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.862643
Richardson LF (1922) Weather prediction by numerical process. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Salesky ST, Anderson W (2018) Buoyancy effects on large-scale motions in convective atmospheric boundary layers: implications for modulation of near-wall processes. J Fluid Mech 856:135–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.711
Salesky ST, Anderson W (2020) Revisiting inclination of large-scale motions in unstably stratified channel flow. J Fluid Mech 884
Salesky ST, Chamecki M (2012) Random errors in turbulence measurements in the atmospheric surface layer: Implications for Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. J Atmos Sci 69(12):3700–3714. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-096.1
Salesky ST, Chamecki M, Dias NL (2012) Estimating the random error in eddy-covariance based fluxes and other turbulence statistics: the filtering method. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 144(1):113–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9710-0
Stoll R, Gibbs JA, Salesky ST, Anderson W, Calaf M (2020) Large-Eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 177(2):541–581
Sullivan PP, Weil JC, Patton EG, Jonker HJJ, Mironov DV (2016) Turbulent winds and temperature fronts in large-eddy simulations of the stable atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 73(4):1815–1840
van Heerwaarden CC, vanStratum BJH, Heus T, Gibbs JA, Fedorovich E, Mellado JP (2017) MicroHH 1.0: a computational fluid dynamics code for direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flows. Geosci Model Dev 10(8):3145–3165
Venugopal V, Porté-Agel F, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Carper M (2003) Multiscale interactions between surface shear stress and velocity in turbulent boundary layers. J Geophys Res Atmos 108(D19)
Vinuesa R, Prus C, Schlatter P, Nagib HM (2016) Convergence of numerical simulations of turbulent wall-bounded flows and mean cross-flow structure of rectangular ducts. Meccanica 51(12):3025–3042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0558-0
Wyngaard JC, Coté OR (1972) Cospectral similarity in the atmospheric surface layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 98(417):590–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841708
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant AGS-1660367. The authors acknowledge high-performance computing support from Cheyenne (doi:10.5065/D6RX99HX) provided by NCAR’s Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The authors also wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. Data from this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibbs, J.A., Stoll, R. & Salesky, S.T. Inclination Angles of Turbulent Structures in Stably Stratified Boundary Layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 186, 27–41 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-022-00740-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-022-00740-7