Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 166, Issue 3, pp 367–393 | Cite as

Impacts of Realistic Urban Heating, Part I: Spatial Variability of Mean Flow, Turbulent Exchange and Pollutant Dispersion

  • Negin Nazarian
  • Alberto Martilli
  • Jan Kleissl
Research Article

Abstract

As urbanization progresses, more realistic methods are required to analyze the urban microclimate. However, given the complexity and computational cost of numerical models, the effects of realistic representations should be evaluated to identify the level of detail required for an accurate analysis. We consider the realistic representation of surface heating in an idealized three-dimensional urban configuration, and evaluate the spatial variability of flow statistics (mean flow and turbulent fluxes) in urban streets. Large-eddy simulations coupled with an urban energy balance model are employed, and the heating distribution of urban surfaces is parametrized using sets of horizontal and vertical Richardson numbers, characterizing thermal stratification and heating orientation with respect to the wind direction. For all studied conditions, the thermal field is strongly affected by the orientation of heating with respect to the airflow. The modification of airflow by the horizontal heating is also pronounced for strongly unstable conditions. The formation of the canyon vortices is affected by the three-dimensional heating distribution in both spanwise and streamwise street canyons, such that the secondary vortex is seen adjacent to the windward wall. For the dispersion field, however, the overall heating of urban surfaces, and more importantly, the vertical temperature gradient, dominate the distribution of concentration and the removal of pollutants from the building canyon. Accordingly, the spatial variability of concentration is not significantly affected by the detailed heating distribution. The analysis is extended to assess the effects of three-dimensional surface heating on turbulent transfer. Quadrant analysis reveals that the differential heating also affects the dominance of ejection and sweep events and the efficiency of turbulent transfer (exuberance) within the street canyon and at the roof level, while the vertical variation of these parameters is less dependent on the detailed heating of urban facets.

Keywords

Computational fluid dynamics Pollutant dispersion Realistic heating distribution Three-dimensional street canyon Turbulent transfer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Omduth Coceal from University of Reading for providing the data of the DNS analysis used in this paper. Funding was received from the National Science Foundation, Environmental Sustainability CAREER award number CBET-0847054, as well as from the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise programme.

References

  1. Allegrini J, Dorer V, Carmeliet J (2013) Wind tunnel measurements of buoyant flows in street canyons. Build Environ 59:315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonia R (1981) Conditional sampling in turbulence measurement. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13(1):131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASHRAE AS (2004) Standard 90.1-2004, energy standard for buildings except low rise residential buildings. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown DF (1997) An improved methodology for characterizing atmospheric boundary layer turbulence and dispersion. PhD thesis, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai XM (2012) Effects of wall heating on flow characteristics in a street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142(3):443–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng W, Liu CH (2011) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent transports in urban street canyons in different thermal stabilities. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99(4):434–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christen A, van Gorsel E, Vogt R (2007) Coherent structures in urban roughness sublayer turbulence. Int J Climatol 27(14):1955–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coceal O, Thomas TG, Castro IP, Belcher SE (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121(3):491–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coceal O, Dobre A, Thomas TG (2007a) Unsteady dynamics and organized structures from DNS over an idealized building canopy. Int J Climatol 27(14):1943–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coceal O, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007b) Spatial variability of flow statistics within regular building arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125(3):537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deardorff JW (1980) Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 18(4):495–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gousseau P, Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Van Heijst G (2011) CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: a case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown montreal. Atmos Environ 45(2):428–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hillel D (1982) Introduction to soil physics. Academic, New York, pp 364Google Scholar
  14. Inagaki A, Castillo MCL, Yamashita Y, Kanda M, Takimoto H (2012) Large-eddy simulation of coherent flow structures within a cubical canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142(2):207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim JJ, Baik JJ (1999) A numerical study of thermal effects on flow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons. J Appl Meteorol 38(9):1249–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim JJ, Baik JJ (2001) Urban street-canyon flows with bottom heating. Atmos Environ 35(20):3395–3404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kovar-Panskus A, Moulinneuf L, Savory E, Abdelqari A, Sini JF, Rosant JM, Robins A, Toy N (2002) A wind tunnel investigation of the influence of solar-induced wall-heating on the flow regime within a simulated urban street canyon. Water Air Soil Pollut 2(5–6):555–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krayenhoff ES, Voogt JA (2007) A microscale three-dimensional urban energy balance model for studying surface temperatures. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123(3):433–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Letzel MO, Krane M, Raasch S (2008) High resolution urban large-eddy simulation studies from street canyon to neighbourhood scale. Atmos Environ 42(38):8770–8784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li XX, Britter RE, Koh TY, Norford LK, Liu CH, Entekhabi D, Leung DY (2010) Large-eddy simulation of flow and pollutant transport in urban street canyons with ground heating. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 137(2):187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maronga B, Gryschka M, Heinze R, Hoffmann F, Kanani-Sühring F, Keck M, Ketelsen K, Letzel M, Sühring M, Raasch S (2015) The parallelized large-eddy simulation model (PALM) version 4.0 for atmospheric and oceanic flows: model formulation, recent developments, and future perspectives. Geosci Model Dev Discuss 8(2015), Nr 2, S 1539–1637Google Scholar
  22. Meroney RN, Pavageau M, Rafailidis S, Schatzmann M (1996) Study of line source characteristics for 2-D physical modelling of pollutant dispersion in street canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 62(1):37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Michioka T, Sato A, Takimoto H, Kanda M (2011) Large-eddy simulation for the mechanism of pollutant removal from a two-dimensional street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 138(2):195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakamura Y, Oke TR (1988) Wind, temperature and stability conditions in an east–west oriented urban canyon. Atmos Environ (1967) 22(12):2691–2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nazarian N, Kleissl J (2015) CFD simulation of an idealized urban environment: thermal effects of geometrical characteristics and surface materials. Urban Clim 12:141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nazarian N, Kleissl J (2016) Realistic solar heating in urban areas: air exchange and street-canyon ventilation. Build Environ 95:75–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park SB, Baik JJ, Raasch S, Letzel MO (2012) A large-eddy simulation study of thermal effects on turbulent flow and dispersion in and above a street canyon. J Appl Meteorol Clim 51(5):829–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pedersen C, Liesen R, Strand R, Fisher D, Dong L, Ellis P (2001) A toolkit for building load calculations; exterior heat balance. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE), Building Systems Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Piacsek SA, Williams GP (1970) Conservation properties of convection difference schemes. J Comput Phys 6(3):392–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qu Y, Milliez M, Musson-Genon L, Carissimo B (2012) Numerical study of the thermal effects of buildings on low-speed airflow taking into account 3D atmospheric radiation in urban canopy. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 104:474–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raasch S, Schröter M (2001) PALM-a large-eddy simulation model performing on massively parallel computers. Meteorol Z 10(5):363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13(1):97–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22(1):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salim SM, Buccolieri R, Chan A, Di Sabatino S (2011) Numerical simulation of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon: Comparison between RANS and LES. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99(2):103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salizzoni P, Soulhac L, Mejean P (2009) Street canyon ventilation and atmospheric turbulence. Atmos Environ 43(32):5056–5067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Santiago J, Krayenhoff E, Martilli A (2014) Flow simulations for simplified urban configurations with microscale distributions of surface thermal forcing. Urban Clim 9:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaw RH, Tavangar J, Ward DP (1983) Structure of the Reynolds stress in a canopy layer. J Appl Meteorol Clim 22(11):1922–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sini JF, Anquetin S, Mestayer PG (1996) Pollutant dispersion and thermal effects in urban street canyons. Atmos Environ 30(15):2659–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart ID, Oke TR (2012) Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(12):1879–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan Z, Dong J, Xiao Y, Tu J (2015) A numerical study of diurnally varying surface temperature on flow patterns and pollutant dispersion in street canyons. Atmos Environ 104:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Uehara K, Murakami S, Oikawa S, Wakamatsu S (2000) Wind tunnel experiments on how thermal stratification affects flow in and above urban street canyons. Atmos Environ 34(10):1553–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wallace JM, Eckelmann H, Brodkey RS (1972) The wall region in turbulent shear flow. J Fluid Mech 54(01):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willmarth W, Lu S (1972) Structure of the Reynolds stress near the wall. J Fluid Mech 55(01):65–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xie ZT, Castro IP (2009) Large-eddy simulation for flow and dispersion in urban streets. Atmos Environ 43(13):2174–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xie X, Liu CH, Leung DY, Leung MK (2006) Characteristics of air exchange in a street canyon with ground heating. Atmos Environ 40(33):6396–6409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xie X, Liu CH, Leung DY (2007) Impact of building facades and ground heating on wind flow and pollutant transport in street canyons. Atmos Environ 41(39):9030–9049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yaghoobian N, Kleissl J (2012) An indoor-outdoor building energy simulator to study urban modification effects on building energy use-model description and validation. Energy Build 54:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yaghoobian N, Kleissl J, Paw UKT (2014) An improved three-dimensional simulation of the diurnally varying street-canyon flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 153(2):251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zmeureanu R, Fazio P, Haghighat F (1987) Analytical and inter-program validation of a building thermal model. Energy Build 10(2):121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and TechnologySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  4. 4.Center for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations