Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 165, Issue 2, pp 251–276 | Cite as

Water-Channel Estimation of Eulerian and Lagrangian Time Scales of the Turbulence in Idealized Two-Dimensional Urban Canopies

  • Annalisa Di Bernardino
  • Paolo Monti
  • Giovanni Leuzzi
  • Giorgio Querzoli
Research Article
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

Lagrangian and Eulerian statistics are obtained from a water-channel experiment of an idealized two-dimensional urban canopy flow in neutral conditions. The objective is to quantify the Eulerian \((T^{\mathrm{E}})\) and Lagrangian \((T^{\mathrm{L}})\) time scales of the turbulence above the canopy layer as well as to investigate their dependence on the aspect ratio of the canopy, AR, as the latter is the ratio of the width (W) to the height (H) of the canyon. Experiments are also conducted for the case of flat terrain, which can be thought of as equivalent to a classical one-directional shear flow. The values found for the Eulerian time scales on flat terrain are in agreement with previous numerical results found in the literature. It is found that both the streamwise and vertical components of the Lagrangian time scale, \(T_\mathrm{u}^\mathrm{L} \) and \(T_\mathrm{w}^\mathrm{L} \), follow Raupach’s linear law within the constant-flux layer. The same holds true for \(T_\mathrm{w}^\mathrm{L} \) in both the canopies analyzed \((AR= 1\) and \(AR= 2\)) and also for \(T_\mathrm{u}^\mathrm{L} \) when \(AR = 1\). In contrast, for \(AR = 2\), \(T_\mathrm{u}^\mathrm{L} \) follows Raupach’s law only above \(z=2H\). Below that level, \(T_\mathrm{u}^\mathrm{L} \) is nearly constant with height, showing at \(z=H\) a value approximately one order of magnitude greater than that found for \(AR = 1\). It is shown that the assumption usually adopted for flat terrain, that \(\beta =T^{\mathrm{L}}/T^{\mathrm{E}}\) is proportional to the inverse of the turbulence intensity, also holds true even for the canopy flow in the constant-flux layer. In particular, \(\gamma /i_\mathrm{u} \) fits well \(\beta _\mathrm{u} =T_\mathrm{u}^\mathrm{L} /T_\mathrm{u}^\mathrm{E} \) in both the configurations by choosing \(\gamma \) to be 0.35 (here, \(i_\mathrm{u} =\sigma _\mathrm{u} / \bar{u} \), where \(\bar{u} \) and \(\sigma _\mathrm{u} \) are the mean and the root-mean-square of the streamwise velocity component, respectively). On the other hand, \(\beta _\mathrm{w} =T_\mathrm{w}^\mathrm{L} /T_\mathrm{w}^\mathrm{E} \) follows approximately \(\gamma /i_\mathrm{w} =0.65/\left( {\sigma _\mathrm{w} /\bar{u} } \right) \) for \(z > 2H\), irrespective of the AR value. The second main objective is to estimate other parameters of interest in dispersion studies, such as the eddy diffusivity of momentum \((K_\mathrm{{T}})\) and the Kolmogorov constant \((C_0)\). It is found that \(C_0\) depends appreciably on the velocity component both for the flat terrain and canopy flow, even though for the latter case it is insensitive to AR values. In all the three experimental configurations analyzed here, \(K_\mathrm{{T}}\) shows an overall linear growth with height in agreement with the linear trend predicted by Prandtl’s theory.

Keywords

Building Eddy diffusivity Feature tracking Kolmogorov constant Raupach law 

References

  1. Amicarelli A, Salizzoni P, Leuzzi G, Monti P, Soulhac L, Cierco F-X, Leboeuf F (2012) Sensitivity analysis of a concentration fluctuation model to dissipation rate estimates. Int J Environ Pollut 48:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anfossi D, Rizza U, Mangia C, Degrazia GA, Pereira Marques Filho E (2006) Estimation of the ratio between the Lagrangian and Eulerian time scales in an atmospheric boundary layer generated by large eddy simulation. Atmos Environ 40:326–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badas MG, Ferrari S, Garau M, Querzoli G (2017) On the effect of gable roof on natural ventilation in two-dimensional urban canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 162:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai K, Katz J, Meneveau C (2015) Turbulent flow structure inside a canopy with complex multi-scale elements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 155:435–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baik J-J, Park R-S, Chun H-Y, Kim J-J (2000) A laboratory model of urban street canyon flows. J Appl Meteorol 39:1592–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow JF (2014) Progress in observing and modelling the urban boundary layer. Urban Clim 10:216–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlow JF, Coceal O (2009) A review of urban roughness sublayer turbulence. UK Met Office Technical Report No. 527, p 68Google Scholar
  8. Barlow JF, Harman IN, Belcher SE (2004) Scalar fluxes from urban street canyons. Part I: laboratory simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boffetta G, Cencini M, Espa S, Querzoli G (2000) Chaotic advection and relative dispersion in an experimental convective flow. Phys Fluids 12:3160–3167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro IP, Cheng H, Reynolds R (2006) Turbulence over urban-type roughness: deductions from wind-tunnel measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cenedese A, Del Prete Z, Miozzi M, Querzoli G (2005) A laboratory investigation of the flow in the left ventricle of a human heart with prosthetic, tilting-disk valves. Exp Fluids 39:322–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coceal O, Dobre A, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007) Structure of turbulent flow over regular arrays of cubical roughness. J Fluid Mech 589:375–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corrsin S (1963) Estimates of the relations between Eulerian and Lagrangian scales in large Reynolds number turbulence. J Atmos Sci 20:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dallman A, Di Sabatino S, Fernando HJS (2013) Flow and turbulence in an industrial/suburban roughness canopy. Environ Fluid Mech 13:279–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Bernardino A, Monti P, Leuzzi G, Querzoli G (2015a) On the effect of the aspect ratio on flow and turbulence over a two-dimensional street canyon. Int J Environ Pollut 58:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Bernardino A, Monti P, Leuzzi G, Querzoli G (2015b) Water-channel study of flow and turbulence past a two-dimensional array of obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 155:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flesch TK, Wilson JD (1992) A two-dimensional trajectory-simulation model for non-Gaussian, inhomogeneous turbulence within plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61:349–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of urban surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38:1261–1292Google Scholar
  20. Guala M, Liberzon A, Tsinober A, Kinzelbach W (2007) An experimental investigation on Lagrangian correlations of small-scale turbulence at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 574:405–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanna SR (1981) Lagrangian and Eulerian time-scale in the daytime boundary layer. J Appl Meteorol 20:242–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haverd V, Leuning R, Griffith D, van Gorsel E, Cuntz M (2009) The turbulent Lagrangian time scale in forest canopies constrained by fluxes, concentrations and source distributions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 130:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hinze J (1975) Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Iliopoulos I, Hanratty TJ (1999) Turbulent dispersion in a non-homogeneous field. J Fluid Mech 392:45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kastner-Klein P, Rotach MW (2004) Mean flow and turbulence characteristics in an urban roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:55–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Djenidi L, Antonia RA (2004) Structure of turbulent channel flow with square bars on one wall. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25:384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Djenidi L, Antonia RA (2015) Heat transfer in a turbulent channel flow with square bars or circular rods on one wall. J Fluid Mech 776:512–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leuning R, Denmead OT, Miyata A, Kim J (2000) Source/sink distributions of heat, water vapour, carbon dioxide and methane in a rice canopy estimated using Lagrangian dispersion analysis. Agric For Meteorol 104:233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leuzzi G, Amicarelli A, Monti P, Thomson DJ (2012) A 3D Lagrangian micromixing dispersion model LAGFLUM and its validation with a wind tunnel experiment. Atmos Environ 54:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li PY, Taylor PA (2005) Three-dimensional Lagrangian simulation of suspended particles in the neutrally stratified atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lien RC, D’Asaro EA (2002) The Kolmogorov constant for the Lagrangian velocity spectrum and structure function. Phys Fluids 14:4456–4459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luhar AK, Britter RE (1989) A random walk model for dispersion in inhomogeneous turbulence in a convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 23:1911–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luo J, Ushijima T, Kitoh O, Lu Z, Liu Y (2007) Lagrangian dispersion in turbulent channel flow and its relationship to Eulerian statistics. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 28:871–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michioka T, Sato A, Takimoto H, Kanda M (2011) Large-eddy simulation for the mechanism of pollutant removal from a two-dimensional street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 138:195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mito Y, Hanratty TJ (2002) Use of a modified Langevin equation to describe turbulent dispersion of fluid particles in a channel flow. Flow Turbul Combust 68:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mölder M, Klemedtsson L, Lindroth A (2004) Turbulence characteristics and dispersion in a forest–tests of Thomson’s random-flight model. Agric For Meteorol 127:203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Monin AS, Yaglom AM (1975) Statistical fluid mechanics, vol 2. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Monti P, Leuzzi G (1996) A closure to derive a three-dimensional well-mixed trajectory model for non-Gaussian, inhomogeneous turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80:311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Monti P, Leuzzi G (2010) Lagrangian models of dispersion in marine environment. Environ Fluid Mech 10:637–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Monti P, Querzoli G, Cenedese A, Piccinini S (2007) Mixing properties of a stably stratified parallel shear layer. Phys Fluids 19:085104. doi: 10.1063/1.2756580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neophytou MK-A, Markides CN, Fokaides PA (2014) An experimental study of the flow through and over two-dimensional rectangular roughness elements: Deductions for urban boundary layer parameterizations and exchange processes. Phys Fluids 26:086603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oke T (1987) Boundary-layer climates. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Ouellette NT, Xu H, Bourgoin M, Bodenschatz E (2006) Small-scale anisotropy in Lagrangian turbulence. New J Phys 8:102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Panofsky HA, Dutton JA (1984) Atmospheric turbulence. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Pasquill F (1974) Atmospheric diffusion. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Pelliccioni A, Monti P, Leuzzi G (2016) Wind-speed profile and roughness sublayer depth modelling in urban boundary layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 160:225–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poggi D, Katul G, Albertson J (2006) Scalar dispersion within a model canopy: measurements and three-dimensional Lagrangian models. Adv Water Resour 29:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Poggi D, Katul GG, Cassiani M (2008) On the anomalous behavior of the Lagrangian structure function similarity constant inside dense canopies. Atmos Environ 42:4212–4231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raupach MR (1989) Applying Lagrangian fluid mechanics to infer scalar source distributions from concentration profiles in plant canopies. Agric For Meteorol 47:85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds RT, Castro IP (2008) Measurements in an urban-type boundary layer. Exp Fluids 45:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rotach MW (1999) On the influence of the urban roughness sublayer on turbulence and dispersion. Atmos Environ 33:4001–4008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salizzoni P, Marro M, Soulhac L, Grosjean N, Perkins RJ (2011) Turbulent transfer between street canyons and the overlying atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141:393–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sawford BL (2001) Turbulent relative dispersion. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:289–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Snyder WH (1972) Similarity criteria for the application of fluid models to the study of air pollution meteorology. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 3:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stocchino A, Besio G, Angiolani S, Brocchini M (2011) Lagrangian mixing in straight compound channels. J Fluid Mech 675:168–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Takimoto H, Sato A, Barlow JF, Moriwaki R, Inagaki A, Onomura S, Kanda M (2011) Particle image velocimetry measurements of turbulent flow in outdoor and indoor urban scale models and flushing motions in urban canopy layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taylor GI (1921) Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc Lond Math Soc 20:196Google Scholar
  60. Thomson DJ (1987) Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 180:529–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Uehara K, Wakamatsu S, Ooka R (2003) Studies on critical Reynolds number indices for wind-tunnel experiments on flow within urban areas. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. VDI (2000) Physical modelling of flow and dispersion processes in the atmospheric boundary layer application of wind tunnels. Verein Deutcher Ingenieure (VDI), BerlinGoogle Scholar
  63. Wallace JM, Vukoslavčević PV (2010) Measurement of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 42:157–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang QZ, Squires KD, Wu X (1995) Lagrangian statistics in turbulent channel flows. Atmos Environ 29:2417–2427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilczek M, Xu H, Narita Y (2014) A note on Taylor’s hypothesis under large-scale flow variation. Nonlin Processes Geophys 21:645–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson JD, Sawford BL (1996) Review of Lagrangian stochastic models for trajectories in the turbulent atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yeung PK (2002) Lagrangian investigations of turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34:115–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DICEAUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly
  2. 2.DICAARUniversità degli Studi di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations