Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 163, Issue 2, pp 253–271 | Cite as

Fractional Flow Speed-Up from Porous Windbreaks for Enhanced Wind-Turbine Power

  • Nicolas Tobin
  • Ali M. Hamed
  • Leonardo P. Chamorro
Research Article

Abstract

The potential for porous windbreaks to enhance wind-turbine power production is studied using linearized theory and wind-tunnel experiments. Results suggest that windbreaks have the potential to substantially increase power production, while lowering mean shear, and leading to negligible changes in turbulence intensity. The fractional increase in turbine power output is found to vary roughly linearly with windbreak height, where a windbreak 10% the height of the turbine hub increases power by around 10%. Wind-tunnel experiments with a windbreak imposed beneath a turbulent boundary layer show the linearized predictions to be in good agreement with particle-image-velocimetry data. Power measurements from a model turbine further corroborate predictions in power increase. Moreover, the wake of the windbreak showed a significant interaction with the turbine wake, which may inform windbreak use in large wind farms. Power measurements from a second turbine downwind of the first with its own windbreak show that the net effect for multiple turbines is dependent on windbreak height.

Keywords

Boundary layer Linear theory Windbreak Wind power Wind turbine 

References

  1. Adrian RJ, Meinhart CD, Tomkins CD (2000) Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 422:1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arya SPS (1975) A drag partition theory for determining the large-scale roughness parameter and wind stress on the Arctic pack ice. J Geophys Res 80(24):3447–3454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltaxe R (1967) Air flow patterns in the lee of model windbreaks. Arch Meteorol Geophys Bioklimatol Ser B 15(3):287–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batchelor GK, Proudman I (1954) The effect of rapid distortion of a fluid in turbulent motion. Q J Mech Appl Math 7(1):83–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belcher SE, Hunt JCR (1998) Turbulent flow over hills and waves. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30(1):507–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britter RE, Hunt JCR, Richards KJ (1981) Air flow over a two-dimensional hill: studies of velocity speed-up, roughness effects and turbulence. Q J R Meteorol Soc 107:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bywaters G, John V, Lynch J, Mattilaand G, Norton P, Stowell J, Salata M, Labath O, Chertok A, Hablanian D (2004) Northern power systems WindPACT drive train alternative design study report. Tech Rep NREL/SR-500-35524, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  8. Cal RB, Lebrón J, Castillo L, Kang HS, Meneveau C (2010) Experimental study of the horizontally averaged flow structure in a model wind-turbine array boundary layer. J Renew Sustain Energy 2(1):013,106.Google Scholar
  9. Calaf M, Meneveau C, Meyers J (2010) Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers. Phys Fluids 22(1):015,110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen TY, Liou LR (2011) Blockage corrections in wind tunnel tests of small horizontal-axis wind turbines. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 35(3):565–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleugh HA (1998) Effects of windbreaks on airflow, microclimates and crop yields. Agrofor Syst 41(1):55–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen J, Schweizer T, Laxson A, Butterfield S, Schreck L, Fingersh L, Veers P, Ashwill T (2008) Technology improvement opportunities for low wind speed turbines and implications for cost of energy reduction. Tech Rep NREL/TP-500-41036, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornelis WM, Gabriels D (2005) Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control. J Arid Environ 61(2):315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Counihan J, Hunt JCR, Jackson PS (1974) Wakes behind two-dimensional surface obstacles in turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 64(3):529–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong Z, Luo W, Qian G, Wang H (2007) A wind tunnel simulation of the mean velocity fields behind upright porous fences. Agric For Meteorol 146(1):82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fang FM, Wang DY (1997) On the flow around a vertical porous fence. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 67:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frandsen S (1992) On the wind speed reduction in the center of large clusters of wind turbines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 39(1–3):251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hagen LJ, Skidmore EL (1971) Turbulent velocity fluctuations and vertical flow as affected by windbreak porosity. Trans ASAE 14(4):634–0637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hideharu M (1991) Realization of a large-scale turbulence field in a small wind tunnel. Fluid Dyn Res 8(1–4):53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt JCR, Carruthers DJ (1990) Rapid distortion theory and the ’problems’ of turbulence. J Fluid Mech 212:497–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishida M, Sakaguchi D, Ueki H (2000) Suppression of rotating stall by wall roughness control in vaneless diffusers of centrifugal blowers. In: ASME turbo expo 2000: power for land, sea, and air, American society of mechanical engineers, pp V001T03A035–V001T03A035Google Scholar
  22. Jensen M (1974) The aerodynamics of shelter. In: FAO Conservation Guide (FAO)Google Scholar
  23. Johnson E, Fontaine AA, Jonson ML, Meyer RS, Straka WA, Young S, van Dam CP, Shiu H, Barone M (2013) A 1:8.7 scale water tunnel test of an axial flow water turbine. In: Proceedings of the 1st marine energy technology symposiumGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22:165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaNier MW (2005) LWST Phase i project conceptual design study: evaluation of design and construction approaches for economical hybrid steel/concrete wind turbine towers; June 28, 2002–July 31, 2004. Tech Rep NREL/SR-500-36777, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  27. Lantz E, Hand M, Wiser R (2012) The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy. In: Fellows C (ed) Proceedings of the 2012 World Renewable Energy Forum. American Solar Energy SocietyGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemelin DR, Surry D, Davenport AG (1988) Simple approximations for wind speed-up over hills. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 28(1):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malcolm DJ, Hansen AC (2006) WindPACT turbine rotor design study. Tech Rep NREL/SR-500-32495, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  30. Meneveau C (2012) The top-down model of wind farm boundary layers and its applications. J Turbul 13:N7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moné C, Smith A, Maples B, Hand M (2015) 2013 Cost of wind energy. Tech Rep NREL/TP-5000-63267, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  32. Ogawa Y, Diosey PG (1967) Surface roughness and thermal stratification effects on the flow behind a two-dimensional fence-I. Field study. Atmos Environ 14(11):1301–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palma JMLM, Castro FA, Ribeiro LF, Rodrigues AH, Pinto AP (2008) Linear and nonlinear models in wind resource assessment and wind turbine micro-siting in complex terrain. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96(12):2308–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patton EG, Shaw RH, Judd MJ, Raupach MR (1998) Large-eddy simulation of windbreak flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87(2):275–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plate EJ (1971) The aerodynamics of shelter belts. Agric Meteorol 8:203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pope SB (2001) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 802 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Raine JK, Stevenson DC (1977) Wind protection by model fences in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2(2):159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shen X, Zhu X, Du Z (2011) Wind turbine aerodynamics and loads control in wind shear flow. Energy 36(3):1424–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shiu H, van Dam CP, Johnson E, Barone M, Phillips R, Straka W, Fontaine A, Jonson M (2012) A design of a hydrofoil family for current-driven marine-hydrokinetic turbines. In: Proceedings of the 2012 20th international conference on nuclear engineering collocated with the ASME 2012 power conference ICONE20-POWER2012, American Society of Mechanical EngineersGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang H, Takle ES (1995) A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 75(1):141–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Tobin
    • 1
  • Ali M. Hamed
    • 1
  • Leonardo P. Chamorro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations