Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 158, Issue 2, pp 331–350 | Cite as

On Turbulent Fluxes During Strong Winter Bora Wind Events

  • Nevio BabićEmail author
  • Željko Večenaj
  • Hrvoje Kozmar
  • Kristian Horvath
  • Stephan F. J. De Wekker
  • Branko Grisogono
Article

Abstract

Well known for its severity, the bora downslope windstorms have been extensively studied over the last several decades. This study focuses on the turbulence characteristics of bora at a topographically complex site near the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea. For this purpose, a 3-month eddy-covariance dataset obtained at three levels (10, 22, 40 m) on a 60-m flux tower is used. After determining a suitable averaging time scale of 15 min using the fast Fourier transform and the ogive method, vertical fluxes of momentum and heat were calculated for 17 bora episodes. Up to a wind speed of \(12\,\mathrm {m\, s}^{-1}\), typical vertical profiles of momentum and heat were observed. However, for wind speeds >\(12\,\mathrm {m\, s}^{-1}\), several interesting observations arose. First, the nighttime heat flux at the 10-m level was often found to be positive rather negative. Second, vertical profiles of the momentum flux were larger at the 22-m level than at 10- and 40-m levels, mostly during nearly neutral to weakly stable thermal stratification. Third, these momentum flux profiles showed a large dependence on wind direction, with virtually no vertical transport of momentum for the largest observed wind speeds. For the first time, bora coherent structures have been analyzed using the so-called variable-interval time averaging (VITA) method. The method detected coherent structures in all three wind-speed components, with structure topologies similar to those observed over forest canopies. The momentum flux increase at the 22-m level, relative to the 10- and 40-m levels, is further supported by the VITA findings.

Keywords

Bora Complex terrain Constant-flux layer Coherent structures Flux divergence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Two anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for their valuable comments that led to a significant improvement of the manuscript. This study was funded by the Croatian Science Foundation project CATURBO, No. 09/151 , and the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports project BORA, No. 119-1193086-1311. Tower measurement campaign at Pometeno Brdo was organized within the UKF grant 16/8A WINDEX (www.windex.hr), in collaboration with BORA grant. This work was also partially supported by the EU grant WILL4WIND (www.will4wind.hr), contract no. IPA2007-HR-16IPO-001-040507. This work was also partially supported by Office of Naval Research award N00014-11-1-0709 and by NSF Grant ATM-1151445. We thank Sandip Pal for useful discussions. Temple R. Lee is acknowledged for proofreading the manuscript.

References

  1. Babić K, Bencetić Klaić Z, Večenaj Ž (2012) Determining a turbulence averaging time scale by Fourier analysis for the nocturnal boundary layer. Geofizika 29(1):35–51Google Scholar
  2. Bajić A (1989) Severe bora on the northern Adriatic. Part I: Statistical analysis. Raspr-Pap 24:1–9Google Scholar
  3. Bajić A (1991) Application of the two-layer hydraulic theory on the severe northern Adriatic bora. Meteor Rundschau 44:129–133Google Scholar
  4. Barthlott C, Drobinski P, Fesquet C, Dubos T, Pietras C (2007) Long-term study of coherent structures in the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bechmann A, Sørensen NN, Berg J, Mann J, Réthoré PE (2011) The Bolund experiment. Part II: Blind comparison of microscale flow models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141(2):245–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belušić D, Bencetić Klaić Z (2006) Mesoscale dynamics, structure and predictability of a severe Adriatic bora case. Meteorol Z 15(2):157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belušić D, Mahrt L (2012) Is geometry more universal than physics in atmospheric boundary layer flow? J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 117:D09115Google Scholar
  8. Belušić D, Pasarić M, Orlić M (2004) Quasi-periodic Bora gusts related to the structure of the troposphere. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130(598):1103–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belušić D, Žagar M, Grisogono B (2007) Numerical simulation of pulsations in the bora wind. Q J R Meteorol Soc 133(627):1371–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belušić D, Hrastinski M, Večenaj Ž, Grisogono B (2013) Wind regimes associated with a mountain gap at the northeastern Adriatic coast. J Appl Meteorol Clim 52(9):2089–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bencetić Klaić Z, Belušić D, Grubišić V, Gabela L, Ćoso L (2003) Mesoscale airflow structure over the northern Croatian coast during MAP IOP-a major bora event. Geofizika 20(1):23–61Google Scholar
  12. Berg J, Mann J, Bechmann A, Courtney M, Jørgensen HE (2011) The Bolund Experiment, Part I: Flow over a steep, three-dimensional hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141(2):219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blackwelder R, Kaplan R (1976) On the wall structure of the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 76(01):89–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bougeault P, Binder P, Buzzi A, Dirks R, Kuettner J, Houze R, Smith R, Steinacker R, Volkert H (2001) The MAP special observing period. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82(3):433–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cava D, Schipa S, Giostra U (2005) Investigation of low-frequency perturbations induced by a steep obstacle. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 115(1):27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diebold M, Higgins C, Fang J, Bechmann A, Parlange MB (2013) Flow over hills: a large-eddy simulation of the bolund case. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148(1):177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dupont S, Brunet Y, Finnigan J (2008) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a forested hill: validation and coherent structure identification. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134(636):1911–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enger L, Grisogono B (1998) The response of bora-type flow to sea surface temperature. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124(548):1227–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feigenwinter C, Vogt R (2005) Detection and analysis of coherent structures in urban turbulence. Theor Appl Climatol 81(3–4):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foken T, Wimmer F, Mauder M, Thomas C, Liebethal C (2006) Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem. Atmos Chem Phys 6(12):4395–4402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortuniak K, Pawlak W, Siedlecki M (2013) Integral turbulence statistics over a central European city centre. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146(2):257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gohm A, Mayr G (2005) Numerical and observational case-study of a deep Adriatic bora. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131(608):1363–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grachev AA, Fairall CW, Persson POG, Andreas EL, Guest PS (2005) Stable boundary-layer scaling regimes: the SHEBA data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116(2):201–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grant ER, Ross AN, Gardiner BA, Mobbs SD (2015) Field observations of canopy flows over complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156(2):231–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grinsted A, Moore JC, Jevrejeva S (2004) Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Process Geophys 11(5/6):561–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grisogono B, Belušić D (2009) A review of recent advances in understanding the meso-and microscale properties of the severe bora wind. Tellus A 61(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grubišić V (2004) Bora-driven potential vorticity banners over the Adriatic. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130(602):2571–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grubišić V, Stiperski I (2009) Lee-wave resonances over double bell-shaped obstacles. J Atmos Sci 66(5):1205–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Helgason W, Pomeroy JW (2012) Characteristics of the near-surface boundary layer within a mountain valley during winter. J Appl Meteorol Clim 51(3):583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Högström U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:215–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horiguchi M, Hayashi T, Adachi A, Onogi S (2012) Large-scale turbulence structures and their contributions to the momentum flux and turbulence in the near-neutral atmospheric boundary layer observed from a 213-m tall meteorological tower. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 144(2):179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horvath K, Bajić A, Ivatek-Šahdan S (2011) Dynamical downscaling of wind speed in complex terrain prone to bora-type flows. J Appl Meteorol Soc 50(8):1676–1691Google Scholar
  33. Horvath K, Lin YL, Ivančan-Picek B (2008) Classification of cyclone tracks over the Apennines and the Adriatic Sea. Mon Weather Rev 136(6):2210–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horvath K, Fita L, Romero R, Ivančan-Picek B (2006) A numerical study of the first phase of a deep Mediterranean cyclone: Cyclogenesis in the lee of the Atlas Mountains. Meteorol Z 15(2):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horvath K, Ivatek-Šahdan S, Ivančan-Picek B, Grubišić V (2009) Evolution and structure of two severe cyclonic bora events: contrast between the northern and southern Adriatic. Weather Forecast 24(4):946–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horvath K, Koracin D, Vellore R, Jiang J, Belu R (2012) Sub-kilometer dynamical downscaling of near-surface winds in complex terrain using WRF and MM5 mesoscale models. J Geophys Res-Atmos (1984–2012) 117(D11). doi: 10.1029/2011JD016447
  37. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Lond A 454(1971):903–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jeromel M, Vlado Malačič V, Rakovec J (2009) Weibull distribution of bora and sirocco winds in the northern Adriatic Sea. Geofizika 26(1):85–100Google Scholar
  39. Johansson AV, Alfredsson PH (1982) On the structure of turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 122:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jurčec V (1981) On mesoscale characteristics of bora conditions in Yugoslavia. Weather and weather maps. Springer, New York, pp 640–657Google Scholar
  41. Kailas SV, Narasimha R (1994) Similarity in VITA-detected events in a nearly neutral atmospheric boundary layer. Proc R Soc Lond 447(1930):211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford 304 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Klemp J, Durran D (1987) Numerical modelling of bora winds. Meteorol Atmos Phys 36(1–4):215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kral ST, Sjöblom A, Nygård T (2014) Observations of summer turbulent surface fluxes in a High Arctic fjord. Q J R Meteorol Soc 140(679):666–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krusche N, De Oliveira AP (2004) Characterization of coherent structures in the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 110(2):191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuettner J, O’Neill T (1981) ALPEX-the GARP mountain subprogram. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 62(6):793–805Google Scholar
  47. Lee X, Massman W, Law BE (2004) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 250 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Lepri P, Kozmar H, Večenaj Ž, Grisogono B (2014) A summertime near-ground velocity profile of the Bora wind. Wind Struct 19(5):505–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lopes AS, Palma J, Castro F (2007) Simulation of the Askervein flow. Part 2: large-eddy simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125(1):85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lundquist JK (2003) Intermittent and elliptical inertial oscillations in the atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 60(21):2661–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mahrt L (2007) The influence of nonstationarity on the turbulent flux-gradient relationship for stable stratification. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125:245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahrt L, Gamage N (1987) Observations of turbulence in stratified flow. J Atmos Sci 44:1106–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mason RA, Shirer HN, Wells R, Young GS (2002) Vertical transports by plumes within the moderately convective marine atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci 59(8):1337–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Metzger M, Holmes H (2008) Time scales in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126(1):29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moncrieff J, Clement R, Finnigan J, Meyers T (2004) Averaging, detrending, and filtering of eddy covariance time series. Handbook of micrometeorology. Springer, New York, pp 7–31Google Scholar
  56. Monin A, Obukhov A (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere. Contrib Geophys Inst Acad Sci USSR 151:163–187Google Scholar
  57. Moreira GA, Dos Santos AA, Do Nascimento CA, Valle RM (2012) Numerical study of the neutral atmospheric boundary layer over complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143(2):393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nadeau DF, Pardyjak ER, Higgins CW, Parlange MB (2013) Similarity scaling over a steep alpine slope. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(3):401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oncley SP, Friehe CA, Larue JC, Businger JA, Itsweire EC, Chang SS (1996) Surface-layer fluxes, profiles, and turbulence measurements over uniform terrain under near-neutral conditions. J Atmos Sci 53(7):1029–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Petkovšek Z (1976) Periodicity of bora gusts. Razpr–Pap SMD 20:67–75Google Scholar
  61. Petkovšek Z (1982) Gravity waves and bora gusts. Ann Meteorol (NF) 19:108–110Google Scholar
  62. Petkovšek Z (1987) Main bora gusts—a model explanation. Geofizika 4:41–50Google Scholar
  63. Poje D (1992) Wind persistence in Croatia. Int J Climatol 12(6):569–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reynolds O (1894) On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion. Proc R Soc Lond 56(336–339):40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson SK (1991) Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23(1):601–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Segalini A, Alfredsson PH (2012) Techniques for the eduction of coherent structures from flow measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143(3):433–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith RB (1987) Aerial observations of the Yugoslavian bora. J Atmos Sci 44(2):269–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 666 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas C, Foken T (2007) Flux contribution of coherent structures and its implications for the exchange of energy and matter in a tall spruce canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123(2):317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(1):61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Undheim O, Andersson H, Berge E (2006) Non-linear, microscale modelling of the flow over Askervein Hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120(3):477–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van der Hoven I (1957) Power spectrum of horizontal wind speed in the frequency range from 0.0007 to 900 cycles per hour. J Meteorol 14(2):160–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Večenaj Ž, Belušić D, Grisogono B (2010) Characteristics of the near-surface turbulence during a bora event. Ann Geophys 28:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Večenaj Ž, De Wekker SFJ (2014) Determination of non-stationarity in the surface layer during the T-REX experiment. Q J R Meteorol Soc 141(690):1560–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Večenaj Ž, De Wekker SFJ, Grubišić V (2011) Near-surface characteristics of the turbulence structure during a mountain-wave event. J Appl Meteorol Clim 50(5):1088–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Večenaj Ž, Belušić D, Grubišić V, Grisogono B (2012) Along-coast features of bora-related turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143(3):527–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vickers D, Mahrt L (1997) Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data. J Atmos Ocean Tech 14(3):512–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vickers D, Mahrt L (2006) A solution for flux contamination by mesoscale motions with very weak turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(3):431–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Whiteman CD (2000) Mountain meteorology: fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford 355 ppGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilczak JM, Oncley SP, Stage SA (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99(1):127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yoshino M (1976) Local wind bora: a research summary. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 277–282Google Scholar
  82. Zeri M, Sá LDdA (2011) Scale dependence of coherent structures’ contribution to the daytime buoyancy heat flux over the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Atmos Sci Lett 12(2):200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeophysicsUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  4. 4.Meteorological and Hydrological ServiceZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations