Abstract
Using one or more physical time scales as a basis for timestep (\(\Delta t\)) selection is common in Lagrangian stochastic simulations of particle dispersion. This approach generally works well when the velocity statistics (and thus \(\Delta t\)) vary slowly but problems such as the \(\Delta t\) bias and imbalanced particle fluxes at interfaces can occur when the velocity statistics vary rapidly. These problems can result in violations of the well-mixed condition (WMC) and inaccurate predictions. An additional problem is that unrealistically high (or rogue) particle velocities can occur if \(\Delta t\) is too large. A small constant timestep can be used to reduce or eliminate these problems but incurs the penalty of considerable computational cost. A timestep-buffering technique that eliminates abrupt changes in a variable timestep through linear interpolation is demonstrated to be effective at satisfying the WMC and minimizing rogue velocities for particle dispersion in an idealized one-dimensional turbulence regime with a steep gradient. The technique is also shown to be effective when applied to a more realistic three-dimensional system.







Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
The timestep buffers are analogous to merging lanes on a highway. A car travelling at highway speed cannot turn onto a residential street without slowing first. If it tried, it would likely lose control and drive off the road—a rogue car. By entering a merging lane and slowing to a speed sufficient to negotiate a change in direction, a car can safely merge with the slower traffic. Likewise, a particle that begins taking smaller steps before encountering a steep gradient reduces its chances of becoming rogue and has properties similar to other particles in the same region, helping to ensure satisfaction of the WMC.
Fig. 1 Profiles of the timestep under different selection criteria. The dot-dashed line shows \(\Delta t = 0.02T_\mathrm{L}\), the dashed line \(\Delta t = 0.02\,\min (T_\mathrm{L},T_\mathrm{d})\) and the solid line \(\Delta t = 0.02\,\min (T_\mathrm{L},T_\mathrm{d})\) with timestep buffering. The inset shows a close-up view of the transition zone. Notable locations (\(x_{\mathrm{b1}}, x_{\mathrm{b2}}, x_{\mathrm{tr1}}, x_{\mathrm{{tr2}}}\)) and commonly used terms (zone 1, zone 2, buffer 1, buffer 2, transition zone) are also shown
There was a tenfold increase of the variance of vertical velocity in Postma et al. (2012a). A larger increase is used here to provide a greater challenge to the timestep-buffering technique.
References
Fackrell JE, Robins AG (1982) Concentration fluctuations and fluxes in plumes from point sources in a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 117:1–26
Flesch TK, Wilson JD (1992) A two-dimensional trajectory-simulation model for non-Gaussian, inhomogeneous turbulence within plant canopies. Bound Layer Meteorol 61:349–374
Flesch TK, Wilson JD, Yee E (1995) Backward-time Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models and their application to estimate gaseous emissions. J Appl Meteorol 34:1320–1332
Higham DJ (2001) An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations. SIAM Rev 43(3):525–546
Kloeden P, Platen E (1992) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Applications of mathematics. Springer, Berlin 636 pp
Lin J, Gerbig C (2013) How can we satisfy the well-mixed criterion in highly inhomogeneous flows? A practical approach. In: Lin J, Brunner D, Gerbig C, Stohl A, Luhar A, Webley P (eds) Lagrangian modeling of the atmosphere. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 59–70
Lin J, Brunner D, Gerbig C, Stohl A, Luhar A, Webley P (eds) (2013) Lagrangian modelling of the atmosphere. American Geophysical Union, Washington 349 pp
Lin JC, Gerbig C, Wofsy SC, Andrews AE, Daube BC, Davis KJ, Grainger CA (2003) A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: the stochastic time-inverted Lagrangian transport (STILT) model. J Geophys Res D 108(D16):4493
Luhar AK, Britter RE (1989) A random walk model for dispersion in inhomogeneous turbulence in a convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 23:1911–1924
Luhar AK, Sawford BL (2005) Micromixing modelling of concentration fluctuations in inhomogeneous turbulence in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114:1–30
Luhar AK, Hibberd MF, Borgas MS (2000) A skewed meandering plume model for concentration statistics in the convective boundary layer. Atmos Environ 34:3599–3616
Nasstrom JS, Ermak DL (1999) A homogeneous Langevin equation model, part II: simulation of dispersion in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 92:371–405
Postma JV, Wilson JD, Yee E (2011a) Comparing two implementations of a micromixing model. Part I: wall shear-layer flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140:207–224
Postma JV, Wilson JD, Yee E (2011b) Comparing two implementations of a micromixing model. Part II: canopy flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140:225–241
Postma JV, Yee E, Wilson JD (2012a) First-order inconsistencies caused by rogue trajectories. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 144:431–439
Postma JV, Yee E, Wilson JD (2012b) Predictive model for scalar concentration fluctuations in and above a model plant canopy. Agric For Meteorol 166–167:127–136
Rodean HC (1996) Stochastic Lagrangian models of turbulent diffusion. American Meteorological Society, Boston 84 pp
Sawford BL (2004) Micro-mixing modelling of scalar fluctuations for plumes in homogeneous turbulence. Flow Turbul Combust 72:133–160
Shadwick E, Wilson J, Flesch T (2007) Forward Lagrangian stochastic simulation of a transient source in the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122(2):263–272
Stohl A, Thomson DJ (1999) A density correction for Lagrangian particle dispersion models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:155–167
Thomson DJ (1987) Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 180:529–556
Thomson DJ, Wilson JD (2013) History of Langrangian stochastic models for turbulent dispersion. In: Lin J, Brunner D, Gerbig C, Stohl A, Luhar A, Webley P (eds) Lagrangian modelling of the atmosphere. American Geophysical Union, Dordrecht, pp 19–36
Thomson DJ, Physick WL, Maryon RH (1997) Treatment of interfaces in random walk dispersion models. J Appl Meteorol 36:1284–1295
Wilson JD (2013) Rogue velocities in a Lagrangian stochastic model for idealized inhomogeneous turbulence. In: Lin J, Brunner D, Gerbig C, Stohl A, Luhar A, Webley P (eds) Lagrangian modelling of the atmosphere. American Geophysical Union, Dordrecht, pp 53–58
Wilson JD, Flesch TK (1993) Flow boundaries in random-flight dispersion models: enforcing the well-mixed condition. J Appl Meteorol 32:1695–1707
Wilson JD, Sawford BL (1996) Review of Lagrangian stochastic models for trajectories in the turbulent atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:191–210
Wilson JD, Yee E (2000) Wind transport in an idealised urban canopy. In: Preprints, 3rd symposium on the urban environment. American Meteorological Society, Vancouver, pp 40–41
Wilson JD, Zhuang Y (1989) Restriction on the timestep to be used in stochastic Lagrangian models of turbulent dispersion. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 49:309–316
Wilson JD, Flesch TK, Bourdin P (2010) Ground-to-air gas emission rate inferred from measured concentration rise within a disturbed atmospheric surface layer. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49(9):1818–1830
Yee E, Wilson JD (2007) Instability in Lagrangian stochastic trajectory models, and a method for its cure. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122:243–261
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed and constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Postma, J.V. Timestep Buffering to Preserve the Well-Mixed Condition in Lagrangian Stochastic Simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156, 15–36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0013-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0013-0


