Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 152, Issue 2, pp 189–211 | Cite as

The Impact of Radiation on the GABLS3 Large-Eddy Simulation through the Night and during the Morning Transition

  • J. M. Edwards
  • S. Basu
  • F. C. Bosveld
  • A. A. M. Holtslag


Large-eddy simulation in the GABLS3 intercomparison is concerned with the developed stable boundary layer (SBL) and the ensuing morning transition. The impact of radiative transfer on simulations of this case is assessed. By the time of the reversal of the surface buoyancy flux, a modest reduction of the lapse rate in the developed SBL is apparent in simulations that include longwave radiation. Subsequently, with radiation, the developing mixed layer grows significantly more quickly, so that four hours after the transition the mixed layer is roughly 40 % deeper; the resulting profiles of potential temperature and specific humidity are in better agreement with observations. The inclusion of radiation does not substantively alter the shape of turbulent spectra, but it does indirectly reduce the variance of temperature fluctuations in the mixed layer. The deepening of the mixed layer is interpreted as a response to the reduction of the strength of the capping inversion, resulting from cumulative radiative cooling in the residual layer and around the top of the former SBL. Sensitivity studies are performed to separate the two effects. Solar radiative heating of the atmosphere has a smaller impact on the development of the mixed layer than does longwave radiative cooling and slightly reduces its rate of growth, compared to simulations including longwave radiation alone. These simulations demonstrate that nocturnal radiative processes have an important effect on the morning transition and that they should be considered in future large-eddy simulations of the transition.


GABLS3 Large-eddy simulation Morning transition  Radiation Stable boundary layer 


  1. Angevine WM, Baltink HK, Bosveld FC (2001) Observations of the morning transition of the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu S, Vinuesa JF, Swift A (2008) Dynamic LES modeling of a diurnal cycle. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 128:2190–2210Google Scholar
  3. Basu S, Holtslag AAM, Bosveld FC (2012) GABLS3-LES intercomparison study. ECMWF workshop on diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer. ECMWF, Reading, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  4. Beare RJ (2008) The role of shear in the morning transition boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meterol 129:395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beljaars ACM, Viterbo P (1998) Role of the boundary layer in a numerical weather prediction model. In: Holtslag AAM, P Duynkerke (eds) Clear and cloudy boundary layers, pp 287–304Google Scholar
  6. Bosveld FC, Baas P, van Meijgaard E, de Bruijn EIF, Steeneveld GJ, Holtslag AAM (2014a) The third GABLS intercomparison case for evaluation studies of boundary-layer models. Part A: case selection and set-up. Boundary-Layer Meteorol (submitted)Google Scholar
  7. Bosveld FC, Baas P, Steeneveld GJ, Holtslag AAM, Angevine WM, Bazile E, de Bruijn EIF, Deacu D, Edwards JM, Ek M, Larson VE, Pleim JE, Raschendorfer M, Svensson G (2014b) The third GABLS intercomparison case for evaluation studies of boundary-layer models. Part B: results and process understanding. Boundary-Layer Meteorol (submitted)Google Scholar
  8. Brown AR, Beare RJ, Edwards JM, Lock AP, Keogh SJ, Milton SF, Walters DN (2008) Upgrades to the boundary-layer scheme in the Met Office numerical weather prediction model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 128:117–132Google Scholar
  9. Conzemius RJ, Fedorovich E (2006a) Dynamics of sheared convective boundary layer entrainment. Part I: methodological background and large-eddy simulation. J Atmos Sci 63:1151–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conzemius RJ, Fedorovich E (2006b) Dynamics of sheared convective boundary layer entrainment. Part II: evaluation of bulk model predictions of entrainment flux. J Atmos Sci 63:1179–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coulter RL (1990) A case study of turbulence in the stable nocturnal boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 52:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cusack S, Edwards JM, Crowther JM (1999) Investigating \(k\) distribution methods for parameterizing gaseous absorption in the Hadley Centre climate model. J Geophys Res 104:2051–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuxart J, Holtslag AAM, Beare RJ, Bazile E, Beljaars A, Cheng A, Conangla L, Ek M, Freedman F, Hamdi R, Kerstein A, Kitagawa H, Lenderink G, Lewellen D, Mailhot J, Mauritsen T, Perov V, Schayes G, Steeneveld GJ, Svensson G, Taylor P, Weng W, Wunsch S, Xu KM (2006) Single-column model intercomparison for a stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118:273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dias NL, Brutsaert W (1998) Radiative effects on temperature in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 89:141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards JM (2009a) Radiative processes in the stable boundary layer: Part I. Radiative aspects. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131:105–126Google Scholar
  16. Edwards JM (2009b) Radiative processes in the stable boundary layer: Part II. The development of the nocturnal boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131:127–146Google Scholar
  17. Edwards JM (2009c) Erratum to Radiative processes in the stable boundary layer: Part I. Radiative aspects. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132:349–350Google Scholar
  18. Edwards JM, Slingo A (1996) Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: choosing a configuration for a large-scale model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 122:689–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fedorovich E, Conzemius R, Mironov D (2004) Convective entrainment into a shear-free, linearly stratified atmosphere: bulk models reevaluated through large eddy simulation. J Atmos Sci 61:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garratt JR, Brost RA (1981) Radiative cooling rates within and above the nocturnal boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 38:2730–2746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ha KJ, Mahrt L (2003) Radiative and turbulent fluxes in the nocturnal boundary layer. Tellus 55A:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holtslag AAM, Svensson G, Baas P, Basu S, Beare B, Beljaars A, Bosveld F, Cuxart J, Lindvall J, Steeneveld G, Tjernström M, van de Wiel BJH (2013) Stable atmospheric boundary layers and diurnal cycles— challenges for weather and climate models. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1691–1706Google Scholar
  23. Lindvall J, Svensson G, Hannay C (2013) Evaluation of near-surface parameters in the two versions of the atmospheric model in CESM1 using flux station observations. J Clim 26:26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McClatchey RA, Fenn RW, Selby JEA, Volz FE, Garing JS (1972) The optical properties of the atmosphere. AFCRL 72–0497, Hanscom AFB, Bedford, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakanishi M (2000) Large-eddy simulation of radiation fog. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94:461–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nunes AB, Velho HFC, Degrazia PSG, Goulart A, Rizza U (2010) Morning boundary-layer turbulent kinetic energy by theoretical models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 134:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oreopoulos L, Mlawer E (2010) The Continual Intercomparison of Radiation Codes (CIRC). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:305–310Google Scholar
  28. Oreopoulos L, Mlawer E, Delamere J, Shippert T, Cole J, Fomin B, Iacono M, Jin Z, Li J, Manners J, Räisänen P, Rose F, Zhang Y, Wilson MJ, Rossow WB (2012) The Continual Intercomparison of Radiation Codes: results from phase I. J Geophys Res 117:D06118Google Scholar
  29. Ponnulakshmi VK, Mukund V, Singh DK, Sreenivas KR, Subramanian G (2012) Hypercooling in the nocturnal boundary layer: broadband emissivity schemes. J Atmos Sci 69:2895–2905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porson A, Price J, Lock A, Clark P (2011) Radiation fog. Part II: large-eddy simulations in very stable conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 139:193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Räisänen P (1996) The effect of vertical resolution on clear-sky radiation calculations: tests with two schemes. Tellus 48A:403–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodgers CD, Walshaw CD (1966) The computation of infra-red cooling rate in planetary atmospheres. Q J R Meteorol Soc 92:67–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Jr Miller HL, Chen Z (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007. The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Sorbjan Z (2007) A numerical study of daily transitions in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123:365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sorbjan Z (2012) A study of the stable boundary layer based on a single-column k-theory model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142:33–53Google Scholar
  36. Steeneveld GJ, Wokke MMJ, Zwaaftink CDG, Pijlman S, Heuskinveld BG, Jacobs AFG, Holtslag AAM (2010) Observations of the radiation divergence in the surface layer and its implication for its parameterization in numerical weather prediction models. J Geophys Res 115:D06107Google Scholar
  37. Thomas GE, Stamnes K (1999) Radiative transfer in the atmosphere and ocean, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 517 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Tjemkes SA, Duynkerke PG (1989) The nocturnal boundary layer: Model calculations compared with observations. J Appl Meteorol 28:161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wyngaard JC (1975) Modeling the planetary boundary layer—extension to the stable case. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 9:441–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zilitinkevich SS (1991) Turbulent penetrative convection. Avebury Technical, Aldershot, 179 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Edwards
    • 1
  • S. Basu
    • 2
  • F. C. Bosveld
    • 3
  • A. A. M. Holtslag
    • 4
  1. 1.Met OfficeExeterUK
  2. 2.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Royal Netherlands Meteorological InstituteDe BiltThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations