Skip to main content
Log in

A Length Scale Defining Partially-Resolved Boundary-Layer Turbulence Simulations

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical weather prediction (NWP) model forecasts at horizontal grid lengths in the range of 100 m to 1 km are now possible. Within this range of grid lengths, the convective boundary layer (CBL) is partially resolved and thus in the so-called ‘grey zone’. For simulations in the grey zone, numerical dissipation sources from both the advection scheme and the subgrid model are likely to be significant. Until now, these effects have not been incorporated fully into our understanding of the grey zone. In order to quantify these effects, a dissipation length scale is defined based on the second moment of the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) spectrum. An ensemble of simulations of a CBL are performed using a large-eddy model across the grey-zone resolutions and for a range of subgrid model, advection scheme and vertical grid configurations. The dissipation length scale distinguishes the effects of the different model configurations in the grey zone. In the middle of the boundary layer, the resolved TKE is strongly controlled by the numerical dissipation. This leads to a similarity law for the resolved TKE in the grey zone using the dissipation length scale. A new definition of the grey zone emerges where the inversion depth and dissipation length scale are the same size. This contrasts with the typical definition using the horizontal grid length. At the inversion, however, the variation of the dissipation length scale with grid length is less predictable, reflecting significant challenges for modelling entrainment in the grey zone. The dissipation length scale is thus a simple diagnostic to aid both NWP and large-eddy modellers in understanding the grey zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  • Bretherton CS, MacVean MK, Bechtold P, Chlond A, Cotton WR, Cuxart J, Cuijpers H, Khairoutdinov M, Kosovic B, Lewellen D, Moeng CH, Siebesma P, Stevens B, Stevens DE, Sykes I, Wyant MC (1999) An intercomparison of radiatively driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud as simulated by different numerical models. Q J R Meteorol Soc 125:391–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow FK, Moin P (2003) A further study of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations. J Comput Phys 184:366–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig GC, Dörnbrack A (2008) Entrainment in cumulus clouds: what resolution is cloud-resolving? J Atmos Sci 65:3978–3988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson PA (2004) Turbulence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 628 pp

  • Dorrestijn J, Crommelin DT, Siebesma AP, Jonker HJJ (2013) Stochastic parameterization of shallow cumulus convection estimated from high-resolution model data. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 27:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnert R, Masson V, Couvreux F (2011) A diagnostic for evaluating the representation of turbulence in atmospheric models at the kilometric scale. J Atmos Sci 68:3112–3131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean HW, Browning KA (2012) Quantification of the importance of wind drift to the surface distribution of orographic rain on the occasion of the extreme Cockermouth flood in Cumbria. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139:1342–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard BP, MacVean MK, Lock AP (1993) Positivity-preserving numerical schemes for multidimensional advection. NASA Technical Memorandum 106055 (ICOMP-93905), 62 pp

  • Mason PJ, Derbyshire SH (1990) Large-eddy simulation of the stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 53:117–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piacsek SA, Williams GP (1970) Conservation properties of convection difference schemes. J Comput Phys 6:392–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan PP, Patton EG (2011) The effect of mesh resolution on convective boundary layer statistics and structures generated by large-eddy simulation. J Atmos Sci 68:2395–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warming RF, Hyett BJ (1974) The modified equation approach to the stability and accuracy analysis of finite-difference methods. J Comput Phys 14:159–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard JC (2004) Toward numerical modeling in the ”Terra Incognita”. J Atmos Sci 61:1816–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful for discussions with Dr. David Thomson, Met Office UK, concerning the formulation of the dissipation length scale. The computations reported here were performed using the University of Exeter Supercomputer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Beare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beare, R.J. A Length Scale Defining Partially-Resolved Boundary-Layer Turbulence Simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 151, 39–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9881-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9881-3

Keywords

Navigation