Abstract
The estimation of spatial patterns in surface fluxes from aircraft observations poses several challenges in the presence of heterogeneous land cover. In particular, the effects of turbulence on scalar transport and the different behaviour of passive (e.g. water vapour) versus active (e.g. temperature) scalars may lead to large uncertainties in the source area/flux-footprint estimation for sensible (H) and latent (LE) heat-flux fields. This study uses large-eddy simulation (LES) of the land–atmosphere interactions to investigate the atmospheric boundary-layer (ABL) processes that are likely to create differences in airborne-estimated H and LE footprints. We focus on 32~m altitude aircraft flux observations collected over a study site in central Oklahoma during the Southern Great Plains experiment in 1997 (SGP97). Comparison between the aircraft data and traditional model estimates provide evidence of a difference in source area for turbulent sensible and latent heat fluxes. The LES produces reasonable representations of the observed fluxes, and hence provides credible evidence and explanation of the observed differences in the H and LE footprints. Those differences can be quantified by analyzing the change in the sign of the spatial correlation of the H and LE fields provided by the LES model as a function of height. Dry patterns in relatively moist surroundings are able to generate strong, but localized, sensible heating. However, whereas H at the aircraft altitude is still in phase with the surface, LE presents a more complicated connection to the surface as the dry updrafts force a convergence of the surrounding moist air. Both the observational and LES model evidence support the concept that under strongly advective conditions, H and LE measured at the top of the surface layer (≈50 m) can be associated with very different upwind source areas, effectively contradicting surface-layer self-similarity theory for scalars. The results indicate that, under certain environmental conditions, footprint models will need to predict differing source area/footprint contributions between active (H) and passive (LE) scalar fluxes by considering land-surface heterogeneity and ABL dynamics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albertson JD (1996) Large eddy simulation of land–atmosphere interaction. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis, 185 pp
Albertson JD, Parlange MB (1999a) Natural integration of scalar fluxes from complex terrain. Adv Water Resour 23: 239–252
Albertson JD, Parlange MB (1999b) Surface length scales and shear stress: implications for land–atmosphere interaction over complex terrain. Water Resour Res 35: 2121–2132
Albertson JD, Kustas WP, Scanlon TM (2001) Large-eddy simulation over heterogeneous terrain with remotely sensed land surface conditions. Water Resour Res 37: 1939–1953
Asanuma J, Brutsaert W (1999) The effect of chessboard variability of the surface fluxes on the aggregated turbulence fields in a convective atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 91: 37–50
Bertoldi G, Albertson JD, Kustas WP, Li F, Anderson MC (2007) On the opposing roles of air temperature and wind speed variability in flux estimation from remotely sensed land surface states. Water Resour Res –W10433 . doi:10.1029/2007WR005911
Bertoldi G, Kustas WP, Albertson JD (2008) Estimating spatial variability in atmospheric properties over remotely sensed land-surface conditions. J Appl Meteorol 47: 2147–2165. doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1828.1
Cai XH, Leclerc MY (2007) Forward-in-time and backward-in-time dispersion in the convective boundary layer: the concentration footprint. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123(2): 201–218
Fleisch T (1996) The footprint for flux measurements, from backward Lagrangian stochastic models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78: 399–404
French AN, Schmugge T, Kustas WP, Brubaker K, Prueger J (2003) Surface energy fluxes over El Reno, Oklahoma using high resolution remotely sensed data. Water Resour Res 39(6). doi:10.1029/2002WR1734
Garcia-Carreras L, Parker DJ, Marsham JH (2011) What is the mechanism for the modification of convective cloud distributions by land surface-induced flows?. J Atmos Sci 68: 619–634. doi:10.1175/2010JAS3604.1
Horst TW, Weil JC (1992) Footprint estimation for scalar flux measurements in the atmospheric surface-layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol –3279296
Hsieh C, Katul G, Chi T (2000) An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows. Adv Water Resour 23: 765–772
Huang HY, Margulis SA (2009) On the impact of surface heterogeneity on a realistic convective boundary layer. Water Resour Res 45: W04425. doi:10.1029/2008WR007175
Huang HY, Margulis SA, Chu CR, Tsai HC (2011) Investigation of the impacts of vegetation distribution and evaporative cooling on synthetic urban daytime climate using a coupled LES–LSM model. Hydrol Process 25: 1574–1586. doi:10.1002/hyp.7919
Jackson TJ, LeVine DM, Hsu A, Oldak A, Starks P, Swift C, Isham J, Haken M (1999) Soil moisture mapping at regional scales using microwave radiometry: the Southern Great Plains Hydrology Experiment. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37: 2136–2151
Kaharabata SK, Shuepp PH, Ogunjemiyo S, Shen S, Leclerc MY, Desjardins RL, MacPherson JI (1997) Footprint considerations in BOREAS. J Geophys Res 102(D24):29113–29124
Kaharabata SK, Schuepp P, Fuentes J (1999) Source footprint considerations in the determination of volatile organic compound fluxes from forest canopies. J Appl Meteorol 38(7): 878–884
Kelly RD, Smith EA, MacPherson JI (1992) A comparison of surface sensible and latent heat fluxes from aircraft and surface measurements in FIFE 1987. J Geophys Res 97(D17): 18445–18453
Kljun N, Rotach MW, Schmid HP (2002) A three-dimensional backward lagrangian footprint model for a wide range of boundary-layer stratifications. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103(3): 205–226
Kustas WP, Albertson JD (2003) Effects of surface temperature contrast on land–atmosphere exchange: a case study from Monsoon90. Water Resour Res 39(6): 1159. doi:10.1029/2001WR001226
Kustas WP, Norman JM (1999) Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover. Agric For Meteorol 94(1): 13–29
Kustas WP, Anderson MC, French AN, Vickers D (2006) Using a remote sensing field experiment to investigate flux-footprint relations and flux sampling distributions for tower and aircraft-based observations. Adv Water Resour 29: 355–368
Leclerc MY, Thurtell GW (1990) Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes using a Markovian analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 52(3): 247–258
Leclerc MY, Shen S, Lamb B (1997) Observations and large-eddy simulation modeling of footprints in the lower convective boundary layer. J Geophys Res 102(D8): 9323–9334
LeMone MA, Grossman RL, Chen F, Ikeda K, Yates D (2003) Choosing the averaging interval for comparison of observed and modeled fluxes along aircraft transects over a heterogeneous surface. J Hydrometeorol 4: 179–195
LeMone MA, Chen F, Alfieri JG, Tewari M, Geerts B, Miao Q, Grossman RL, Coulter R (2007) Influence of land cover and soil moisture on the horizontal distribution of sensible and latent heat fluxes in southeast Kansas during IHOP-2002 and CASES-97. J Hydrometeorol 8: 68–87
Lenschow DH (1970) Airplane measurements of planetary boundary layer structure. J Appl Meteorol 9: 874–884
Lenschow DH, Wyngaard JC, Pennel WT (1980) Mean-field and second-moment budgets in a baroclinic, convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 37: 1313–1326
MacPherson JI (1998) Twin otter operations in the 1997 Southern Great Plains experiment. Institute for Aerospace Research Report LTR-FR-146, National Research Council Canada, 122 pp
Mahrt L, Vickers D, Sun J (2001) Spatial variations of surface moisture flux from aircraft data. Adv Water Resour 24: 1133–1141
Norman JM, Kustas WP, Humes KS (1995) A two-source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes from observations of directional radiometric surface temperature. Agric For Meteorol 77: 263–293
Roth M, Oke T (1995) Relative efficiencies of turbulent transfer of heat, mass and momentum over a patchy urban surface. J Atmos Sci 52(11): 1863–1874
Samuelsson P, Tjernstrom M (1999) Airborne flux measurements in NOPEX: comparison with footprint estimated surface heat fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 98(99): 205–225
Schmid HP (2002) Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: a review and perspective. Agric For Meteorol 113(1-4): 159–183
Schuepp P, Leclerc MY, MacPherson JI, Desjardins R (1990) Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 50: 355–373
Sempreviva AM, Hojstrup J (1998) Transport of temperature and humidity variance and covariance in the marine surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87: 233–253
Twine TE, Kustas WP, Norman JM, Cook DR, Houser PR, Meyers TP, Prueger JH, Starks PJ, Wesely ML (2000) Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over grassland. Agric For Meteorol 103: 279–300
Young GS (1988) Turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer, Part I: variability of normalized turbulence statistics. J Atmos Sci 45: 719–726
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bertoldi, G., Kustas, W.P. & Albertson, J.D. Evaluating Source Area Contributions from Aircraft Flux Measurements Over Heterogeneous Land Using Large-Eddy Simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147, 261–279 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9781-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9781-y