Abstract
A self-consistent two-equation closure treating buoyancy and plant drag effects has been developed, through consideration of the behaviour of the supplementary equation for the length-scale-determining variable in homogeneous turbulent flow. Being consistent with the canonical flow regimes of grid turbulence and wall-bounded flow, the closure is also valid for homogeneous shear flows commonly observed inside tall vegetative canopies and in non-neutral atmospheric conditions. Here we examine the most often used two-equation models, namely \({E - \varepsilon}\) and E − ω (where \({\varepsilon}\) is the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, E, and \({\omega = \varepsilon/E}\) is the specific dissipation), comparing the suggested buoyancy-modified closure against Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. Assessment of the closure implementing both buoyancy and plant drag together has been done, comparing the results of the two models against each other. It has been found that the E − ω model gives a better reproduction of complex atmospheric boundary-layer flows, including less sensitivity to numerical artefacts, than does the \({E -\varepsilon}\) model. Re-derivation of the \({\varepsilon}\) equation from the ω equation, however, leads to the \({E - \varepsilon}\) model implementation that produces results identical to the E − ω model. Overall, numerical results show that the closure performs well, opening new possibilities for application of such models to tasks related to the atmospheric boundary layer—where it is important to adequately account for the influences of both vegetation and atmospheric stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apsley DD, Castro IP (1997) A limited-length-scale \({k - \varepsilon}\) model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83: 75–98
Ayotte KW, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1999) A second-order closure for neutrally stratified vegetative canopy flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90: 189–216
Baas P, de Roode SR, Lenderink G (2008) The scaling behavior of a turbulent kinetic energy closure model for stable stratified conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 127: 17–36
Basu S, Vinuesa JF, Swift A (2008) Dynamic LES modeling of a diurnal cycle. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47: 1156–1174
Baumert H, Peters H (2000) Second-moment closures and length scales for weakly stratified turbulent shear flows. J Geophys Res 105: 6453–6468
Blackadar AK (1962) The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere. J Geophys Res 67: 3095–3102
Businger J, Wyngaard JC, Izumi Y, Bradley EF (1971) Flux–profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci 28: 181–189
Cheng Y, Canuto V, Howard A (2002) An improved model for the turbulent PBL. J Atmos Sci 59: 1550–1565
Deardorff JW (1972) Numerical investigations of neutral and unstable planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 18: 495–527
Duynkerke PG (1988) Application of the \({E -\varepsilon}\) turbulence closure model to the neutral and stable atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 45: 865–880
Dyer AJ (1974) A review of flux–profile relationships. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 7: 363–372
Dyer AJ, Hicks BB (1970) Flux–gradient relationships in the constant flux layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 96: 715–721
Finnigan JJ (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32: 519–571
Finnigan JJ (2007) Turbulent flow in canopies on complex topography and the effects of stable stratification. In: Gayev YA, Hunt JCR (eds) Flow and transport processes with complex obstructions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 199–219
Finnigan JJ, Shaw RH (2008) Double-averaging methodology and its application to turbulent flow in and above vegetation canopies. Acta Geophys 56: 534–561
Foken T (2006) 50 years of the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119: 431–447
Freedman FR, Jacobson MZ (2003) Modification of the standard \({\varepsilon}\)-equation for the stable ABL through enforced consistency with Monin–Obukhov theory. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 106: 383–410
Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, U.K., 316 pp
Hanjalić K (2005) Will RANS survive LES? A view of perspectives. ASME J Fluid Eng 27: 831–839
Hanjalić K, Kenjereš S (2008) Some developments in turbulence modeling for wind and environmental engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96: 1537–1570
Harman IN, Finnigan JJ (2007) A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123: 339–363
Högström U (1985) Von Kármán constant in atmospheric boundary flow: reevaluated. J Atmos Sci 42: 263–270
Högström U (1988) Non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles in the atmospheric surface layer: a re-evaluation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 42: 55–78
Högström U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78: 215–246
Jacobs AFG, Van Boxel JH, El-Kilani RMM (1994) Nighttime free convection characteristics within a plant canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 71: 375–391
Kantha LH (2004) The length scale equation in turbulence models. Nonlinear Process Geophys 11: 83–97
Kantha LH, Bao JW, Carniel S (2005) A note on Tennekes hypothesis and its impact on second moment closure models. Ocean Model 9: 23–29
Katul GG, Mahrt L, Poggi D, Sanz C (2004) One- and two-equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113: 81–109
Kelly M, Gryning S-E (2010) Long-term mean wind profiles based on similarity theory. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 136: 377–390
Klipp CL, Mahrt L (2004) Flux–gradient relationship, self-correlation and intermittency in the stable boundary layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130: 2087–2103
Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3: 269–289
Launder BE, Reece GJ, Rodi W (1975) Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulent closure. J Fluid Mech 68: 537–566
Leclerc MY, Shaw RH, Den Hartog G, Neumann HH (1990) The influence of atmospheric stability on the budgets of the Reynolds stress and turbulent kinetic energy within and above a deciduous forest. J Appl Meteorol 29: 916–933
Li X, Zimmerman N, Princevac M (2008) Local imbalance of turbulent kinetic energy in the surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 129: 115–136
Mellor GL, Yamada T (1974) A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31: 1791–1806
Moeng C-H (1984) A Large-eddy simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 41: 2052–2062
Monin AS, Obukhov AM (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the atmosphere near the ground. Trudy geofiz Inst. AN SSSR 24(151):163–187 (in Russian)
Paulson CA (1970) The mathematical representation of wind speed and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. J Appl Meteorol 9: 857–860
Pielke R (2002) Mesoscale meteorological modeling. Academic Press, San Diego
Pinard J-P, Wilson JD (2001) First- and second-order closure models for wind in a plant canopy. J Appl Meteorol 40: 1762–1768
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, U.K., 771 pp
Rao KS, Wyngaard JC, Coté OR (1974) Local advection of momentum, heat, and moisture in micrometeorology. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 7: 331–348
Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22: 79–90
Sanz C (2003) A note on \({k-\varepsilon}\) modelling of vegetation canopy air-flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108: 191–197
Seginer I, Mulhearn PJ, Bradley EF, Finnigan JJ (1976) Turbulent flow in a model plant canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 10: 423–453
Shaw R, Schumann U (1992) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61: 47–80
Sogachev A (2009) A note on two-equation closure modeling of canopy flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 130: 423–435
Sogachev A, Panferov O (2006) Modification of two-equation models to account for plant drag. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121: 229–266
Sogachev A, Menzhulin G, Heimann M, Lloyd J (2002) A simple three dimensional canopy–planetary boundary layer simulation model for scalar concentrations and fluxes. Tellus 54B: 784–819
Sogachev A, Panferov O, Gravenhorst G, Vesala T (2005) Numerical analysis of flux footprints for different landscapes. Theor Appl Climatol 80(2-4): 169–185
Svensson U, Häggkvist K (1990) A two-equation turbulence model for canopy flows. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 35: 201–211
Tóta JD, Fitzjarrald R, Staebler RM, Sakai RK, Moraes OMM, Acevedo OC, Wofsy SC, Manzi A (2008) Amazon rain forest subcanopy flow and the carbon budget: Santarém LBA-ECO site. J Geophys Res 113: G00B02. doi:10.1029/2007JG000597
Vickers D, Mahrt L (1999) Observations of non-dimensional wind shear in the coastal zone. Q J R Meteorol Soc 125: 2685–2702
Wichmann M, Schaller E (1986) On the determination of the closure parameters in higher-order closure models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 37: 323–341
Wilcox DC (1988) Reassessment of the scale determining equation for advance turbulence models. AIAA J 26: 1299–1310
Wilcox DC (2002) Turbulence modeling for CFD. DCW Industries Inc, La Cañada
Wilson JD (2011) An alternative eddy-viscosity model for the horizontally uniform atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. doi:10.1007/s10546-011-9650-0
Wilson JD, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1998) A first-order closure for disturbed plant-canopy flows, and its application to winds in a canopy on a ridge. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124: 705–732
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sogachev, A., Kelly, M. & Leclerc, M.Y. Consistent Two-Equation Closure Modelling for Atmospheric Research: Buoyancy and Vegetation Implementations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 145, 307–327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9726-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9726-5