Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Boundary-Layer Meteorology
  3. Article

The Bolund Experiment, Part II: Blind Comparison of Microscale Flow Models

  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 August 2011
  • volume 141, pages 245–271 (2011)
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript
The Bolund Experiment, Part II: Blind Comparison of Microscale Flow Models
Download PDF
  • A. Bechmann1,
  • N. N. Sørensen1,
  • J. Berg1,
  • J. Mann1 &
  • …
  • P.-E. Réthoré1 
  • 2149 Accesses

  • 129 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Cite this article

Abstract

Bolund measurements were used for a blind comparison of microscale flow models. Fifty-seven models ranging from numerical to physical were used, including large-eddy simulation (LES) models, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models, and linearized models, in addition to wind-tunnel and water-channel experiments. Many assumptions of linearized models were violated when simulating the flow around Bolund. As expected, these models showed large errors. Expectations were higher for LES models. However, of the submitted LES results, all had difficulties in applying the specified boundary conditions and all had large speed-up errors. In contrast, the physical models both managed to apply undisturbed ‘free wind’ boundary conditions and achieve good speed-up results. The most successful models were RANS with two-equation closures. These models gave the lowest errors with respect to speed-up and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) prediction.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Andren A, Brown A, Graf J, Moeng C, Mason P, Nieuwstadt F, Schumann U (1994) Large-eddy simulation of a neutrally stratified boundary layer: a comparison of four computer codes. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 120: 1457–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apsley D, Castro I (1997) A limited-length-scale k-\({\varepsilon}\) model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83: 75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiadou M, Castro I (2001) Neutral flow over a series of rough hills: a laboratory experiment. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101: 1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann A, Sørensen N (2010a) Hybrid RANS/LES applied to complex terrain. Wind Energy. doi:10.1002/we.414

  • Bechmann A, Sørensen N (2010b) Hybrid RANS/LES method for wind flow over complex terrain. Wind Energy 13: 36–50. doi:10.1002/we.246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann A, Berg J, Courtney M, Jørgensen H, Mann J, Sørensen N (2009) The Bolund experiment: overview and background. Risø DTU report Risø-R1658(EN), 50 pp

  • Beljaars A, Walmsley J, Taylor P (1987) A mixed spectral finite difference model for neutrally stratified boundary layer flow over roughness changes and topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 38: 273–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg J, Mann J, Bechmann A, Courtney M, Jørgensen H (2011) The Bolund experiment, part I: flow over a steep, three-dimensional hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorol (this issue)

  • Bradley E (1980) An experimental study of the profiles of wind speed, shearing stress and turbulence at the crest of a large hill. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 106: 101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown A, Hobson J, Wood N (2001) Large-eddy simulation of neutral turbulent flow over rough sinusoidal ridges. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 98: 411–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro F, Snyder W (1982) A wind tunnel study of the dispersion from sources downwind of three-dimensional hills. Atmos Environ 16(8): 1869–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro F, Palma J, Silva Lopes A (2003) Simulation of the Askervein flow. part 1: Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations (k-\({\varepsilon}\) turbulence model). Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107: 501–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow F, Street R (2009) Evaluation of turbulence closure models for large-eddy simulation over complex terrain: flow over Askervein Hill. J Appl Meteorol 48(5): 1050–1065. doi:10.1175/2008JAMC1862.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow F, Weigel A, Street R, Rotach M, Xue M (2006) High-resolution large-eddy simulations of flow in a steep alpine valley. Part I: methodology, verification, and sensitivity experiments. J Appl Meteorol 45(1): 63–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detering E, Etling E (1985) Application of the e-\({\varepsilon}\) turbulence model to the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 33: 113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duynkerke P (1987) Application of the e-\({\epsilon}\) turbulence closure model to the neutral and stable atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 45: 865–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidsvik K (2005) AA system for wind power estimation in mountainous terrain. Prediction of Askervein Hill data. Wind Energy 8: 237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emeis S, Højstrup M, Jensen N (1993) Hjardemål experiment data report. Risø DTU report Risø-M-2289(EN), 126 pp

  • Hunt J, Snyder W (1980) Experiments on stable and neutrally stratified flow over a model three-dimensional hill. J Fluid Mech 96(4): 671–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson P, Hunt J (1975) Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 101: 929–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins G, Mason P, Moores W, Stykes R (1981) Measurements of the flow structure around Ailsa Craig, a steep, three-dimensional, isolated hill. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 107: 833–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen N, Petersen E, Troen I (1984) Extrapolation of mean wind statistics with special regard to wind energy applications. World Meteorological Organization WCP-86, pp 1–85

  • Kim H, Patel V (2000) Test of turbulence models for wind flow over terrain with separation and recirculation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94: 5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launder B, Spalding D (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Mech Appl Mech Eng 3: 269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason P, King J (1985) Measurements and predictions of flow and turbulence over an isolated hill of moderate slope. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 111: 617–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason P, Stykes R (1979) Flow over an isolated hill of moderate slope. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 105: 383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason P, Thomson D (1992) Stochastic backscatter in large-eddy simulations of boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 24: 51–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky H, Dutton J (1984) Atmospheric turbulence models and methods for engineering applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 397 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Porté-Agel F, Meneveau C, Parlange M (2000) A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 415: 261–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raithby G, Stubley G, Taylor P (1987) The Askervein Hill project: a finite control volume prediction of three-dimensional flows over the hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 39: 247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røkenes K, Krogstad PÅ (2009) Wind tunnel simulation of terrain effects on wind farm siting. Wind Energy 12: 391–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon R, Teunissen H, Mickle R, Taylor P (1988) The kettles hill project: field observations, wind-tunnel simulations and numerical model predictions for flow over a low hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 43: 309–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Lopes A, Palma J, Castro F (2007) Simulation of the Askervein flow. Part 2: large-eddy simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125: 85–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms D, Schreck S, Hand M, Fingersh L (2001) NREL unsteady aerodynamics experiment in the Nasa-Ames wind tunnel: a comparison of predictions to measurements. National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/TP-500-29494, 51 pp

  • Sullivan P, McWilliams J, Moeng CH (1994) A subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 71: 247–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PA (1977) Some numerical studies of surface boundary-layer flow above gentle topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 11: 439–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PA, Teunissen H (1987) The Askervein Hill project: overview and background data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 39: 15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PA, Walmsley J, Salmon J (1983) A simple model of neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over real terrain incorporating wavenumber-dependent scaling. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 26: 169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troen I, Petersen E (1989) European wind atlas. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde ISBN: 87-550-1482-8, 656 pp

  • Undheim O, Andersson H, Berge E (2006) Non-linear, microscale modelling of the flow over Askervein Hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120: 477–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley J, Taylor P (1996) Boundary-layer flow over topography: impacts of the Askervein study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78: 291–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley J, Taylor P, Keith T (1986) A simple model of neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over complex terrain with surface roughness modulations (ms3djh/3r). Boundary-Layer Meteorol 36: 157–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley J, Troen I, Lalas D, Mason P (1990) Surface-layer flow in complex terrain: comparison of models and full-scale observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 52: 259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan F, Porte-Agel F, Stoll R (2007) Evaluation of dynamic subgrid-scale models in large-eddy simulations of neutral turbulent flow over a two-dimensional sinusoidal hill. Atmos Environ 41(13): 2719–2728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel A, Chow F, Rotach M, Street R, Xue M (2006) High-resolution large-eddy simulations of flow in a steep alpine valley. Part II: flow structure and heat budgets. J Appl Meteorol 45(1): 87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood N (1995) The onset of separation in neutral, turbulent flow over hills. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 76: 137–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Taylor P (1997) An e-\({\epsilon}\) -l turbulence closure scheme for planetary boundary-layer models: the neutrally stratified case. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 84: 247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeman O, Jensen N (1987) Modification of turbulence characteristics in flow over hills. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 113: 55–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Danish Energy Agency (EFP07—Metoder til kortlægning af vindforhold i komplekst terræn (ENS-33033-0062), the Center for Computational Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Atmospheric Turbulence (under the Danish Council for Strategic Research, Grant No. 09-067216) and Vestas Technology R&D for financial support. We would also like to thank former Risø DTU employee Jeppe Johansen, who envisioned the concept of a field campaign at Bolund and initiated the project together with Hans E. Jørgensen. Without the aid of the technicians in the Test and Measurement section in the wind energy division at Risø DTU, as well as all those Risø DTU employees who helped carrying masts and instruments, this project would not have been possible. Computations were made possible by the use of the Thyra PC-cluster at Risø DTU and DCSC, PC-cluster Yggdrasil. Finally, a special thanks goes to all anonymous contributors who made the blind comparison possible.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Wind Energy Department, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy/Technical University of Denmark, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    A. Bechmann, N. N. Sørensen, J. Berg, J. Mann & P.-E. Réthoré

Authors
  1. A. Bechmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. N. Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Mann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P.-E. Réthoré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bechmann.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechmann, A., Sørensen, N.N., Berg, J. et al. The Bolund Experiment, Part II: Blind Comparison of Microscale Flow Models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141, 245–271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9637-x

Download citation

  • Received: 12 November 2010

  • Accepted: 06 July 2011

  • Published: 11 August 2011

  • Issue Date: November 2011

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9637-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Bolund
  • Blind comparison
  • Complex terrain
  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Microscale
  • Validation
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature