Abstract
We summarize an on-line coupled meteorological–emissions–photochemical modelling system that allows feedback from air-quality/chemistry to meteorology via radiative forcing. We focus on the radiative-forcing impacts (direct effects) of ozone. We present an application of the coupled modelling system to the episode of 23–31 July 1998 in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. Results suggest that the inclusion of radiative-forcing feedback produces small but accountable impacts. For this region and episode, stand-alone radiative transfer simulations, i.e., evaluating the effects of radiative forcing independently of changes in meteorology or emissions, suggest that a change of 1 ppb in ground-level ozone is approximately equivalent to a change of 0.017 W m−2 in radiative forcing. In on-line, coupled, three-dimensional simulations, where the meteorological dependencies are accounted for, domain-wide peak ozone concentrations were higher by 2–4 ppb (relative to a simulated peak of 119.4 ppb) when including the effects of radiative-forcing feedback. A scenario of 10% reduction in anthropogenic emissions produced slightly larger decreases in ozone, an additional 1 ppb in local-peak reductions, relative to scenarios without feedback.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Baklanov A, Korsholm U (2007) On-line integrated meteorological and chemical transport modelling: advantages and prospective. In: 29th NATO/SPS international technical meeting on air pollution modeling and its application, 24–28 September 2007, University of Aveiro, Portugal, pp 21–34
Baklanov A, Korsholm U, Mahura A, Petersen C, Gross A (2008) ENVIRO-HIRLAM: on-line coupled modeling of urban meteorology and air pollution. Adv Sci Res 2: 41–46
Brieglieb BP, Minnis P, Ramanathan V, Harrison E (1986) Comparison of regional clear-sky albedos inferred from satellite observations and model computations. J Clim Appl Meteorol 25: 214–226
Byun D, Schere KL (2006) Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl Mech Rev 59: 51–77
Chan CY, Chan LY, Zheng YG, Harris JM, Oltmans SJ, Christopher S (2001) Effects of 1997 Indonesian forest fires on tropospheric ozone enhancements, radiative forcing, and temperature change over the Hong Kong region. J Geophys Res 106: 14875–14885
DEQ: (1999) Oregon air quality data summaries. Department of Environmental Quality, State of Oregon,
Dudhia J (1993) A non-hydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model: validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon Weather Rev 121: 1493–1513
Ebert EE, Curry JA (1992) A parameterization of ice cloud optical properties for climate models. J Geophys Res 97: 3831–3836
EPA (1999) Draft guidance on the use of models and other analyses in attainment demonstrations for the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard. Report EPA-454/R-99-004, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park
Fan H, Sailor DJ (2005) Modeling the impacts of anthropogenic heating on the urban climate of Philadelphia: a comparison of implementations in two PBL schemes. Atmos Environ 39: 73–84
Forster PM, Shine KP (1997) Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes. J Geophys Res 102: 10841–10855
Fu L, Liou KN (1993) Parameterization of the radiative properties of cirrus clouds. J Atmos Sci 50: 2008–2025
Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1994) A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN—398+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, 122 pp
Grell GA, Emeis S, Stockwell WR, Schoenemeyer T, Forkel Michalakes RJ, Knoche R, Seidl W (2000) Application of a multiscale, coupled MM5/chemistry model to the complex terrain of the VOTALP valley campaign. Atmos Environ 34: 1435–1453
Guenther AB, Zimmerman PR, Harley PC, Monson PK, Fall R (1993) Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability—model evaluations and sensitivity analyses. J Geophys Res 98: 12609–12617
Hu YX, Stamnes K (1993) An accurate parameterization of the radiative properties of water clouds suitable for use in climate models. J Clim 6: 728–742
IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 881 pp
Janjic ZI (1994) The step-mountain eta coordinate model: further development of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulent closure schemes. Mon Weather Rev 122: 927–945
Jin M, Shepherd JM, King MD (2005) Urban aerosols and their variations with clouds and rainfall: a case study for New York and Houston. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2004JD005081
Key J (2001) Streamer user’s guide. Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Key J, Schweiger AJ (1998) Tools for atmospheric radiative transfer: streamer and FluxNet. Comput Geosci 24: 443–451
Kylling AK, Stamnes K, Tsay S-C (1995) A reliable and efficient two-stream algorithm for spherical radiative transfer: documentation of accuracy in realistic layered media. J Atmos Chem 21: 115–150
Naik V, Mauzerall D, Horowitz L, Scharzkopf MD, Ramaswamy V, Oppenheimer M (2005) Net radiative forcing due to changes in regional emissions of tropospheric ozone precursors. J Geophys Res 110: D24306. doi:10.1029/2005JD005908
Pinto JO, Curry JA, Fairall CW (1997) Radiative characteristics of the Arctic atmosphere during spring as inferred from ground-based measurements. J Geophys Res 102: 6941–6952
Pleim J, Young J, Wong D, Gilliam R, Otte T, Mathur R (2008) Two-way coupled meteorology and air quality modeling. In: Air pollution modeling and its application, vol XIX. Springer, pp 235–242. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8453-9
Schmidt EO, Arduini RF, Wielicki BA, Stone RS, Tsay S-C (1995) Considerations for modeling thin cirrus effects via brightness temperature differences. J Appl Meteorol 34: 447–459
Semenza JC, Wilson DJ, Parra J, Bontempo B, Hart M, Sailor DJ, George LA (2008) Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution. Environ Res 107: 401–411
Snell HE, Anderson GP, Wang J, Moncet J-L, Chetwybd JH, English SJ (1995) Validation of FASE and MODTRAN3: updates and comparisons with clear-sky measurements. In: SPIE conference 2578, Paris, France, 1995, pp 194–204
Stamnes K, Tsay S-C, Wiscombe W, Jayaweera K (1988) Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. Appl Opt 27: 2502–2509
Taha H (2008a) Meso-urban meteorological and photochemical modeling of heat island mitigation. Atmos Environ 42: 8795–8809. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.036
Taha H (2008b) Episodic performance and sensitivity of the urbanized MM5 (uMM5) to perturbations in surface properties in Houston TX. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 127: 193–218. doi:10.1007/s10546-007-9258-6
Takano Y, Liou KN (1989) Solar radiative transfer in cirrus clouds. Part I: Single-scattering and optical properties of hexagonal crystals. J Atmos Sci 46: 3–19
Toon OB, McKay CP, Ackerman TP (1989) Rapid calculations of radiative heating rates and photodissociation rates in inhomogeneous multiple scattering atmospheres. J Geophys Res 94: 16287–16301
Tsay S-C, Stamnes K, Jayaweera K (1989) Radiative energy budget in the cloudy and hazy Arctic. J Atmos Sci 46: 1002–1018
WMO (2008) Joint report of COST action 728 and GURME: overview of existing integrated (off-line and on-line) mesoscale meteorological and chemical transport modeling systems in Europe. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taha, H., Sailor, D. Evaluating the Effects of Radiative Forcing Feedback in Modelling Urban Ozone Air Quality in Portland, Oregon: Two-Way Coupled MM5–CMAQ Numerical Model Simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 137, 291–305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9533-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9533-9