Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 205–226 | Cite as

Doppler Lidar Measurements of Vertical Velocity Spectra in the Convective Planetary Boundary Layer

  • Marie LothonEmail author
  • Donald H. Lenschow
  • Shane D. Mayor


We utilized a Doppler lidar to measure spectra of vertical velocity w from 390m above the surface to the top of the daytime convective boundary layer (CBL). The high resolution 2μm wavelength Doppler lidar developed by the NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory was used to detect the mean radial velocity of aerosol particles. It operated continuously during the daytime in the zenith-pointing mode for several days in summer 1996 during the Lidars-in-Flat-Terrain experiment over level farmland in central Illinois, U.S.A. The temporal resolution of the lidar was about 1 s, and the range-gate resolution was about 30m. The vertical cross-sections were used to calculate spectra as a function of height with unprecedented vertical resolution throughout much of the CBL, and, in general, we find continuity of the spectral peaks throughout the depth of the CBL. We compare the observed spectra with previous formulations based on both measurements and numerical simulations, and discuss the considerable differences, both on an averaged and a case-by-case basis. We fit the observed spectra to a model that takes into account the wavelength of the spectral peak and the curvature of the spectra across the transition from low wavenumbers to the inertial subrange. The curvature generally is as large or larger than the von Kármán spectra. There is large case-to-case variability, some of which can be linked to the mean structure of the CBL, especially the mean wind and the convective instability. We also find a large case-to-case variability in our estimates of normalized turbulent kinetic energy dissipation deduced from the spectra, likely due for the most part to a varying ratio of entrainment flux to surface flux. Finally, we find a relatively larger contribution to the low wavenumber region of the spectra in cases with smaller shear across the capping inversion, and suggest that this may be due partly to gravity waves in the inversion and overlying free atmosphere.


Convective boundary layer Doppler lidar Turbulence Vertical velocity spectra 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angevine WM (1999) Entrainment results including advection and case studies from the Flatland boundary layer experiments. J Geophys Res 104: 30,947–30,963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angevine WM, Grimsdell AW, Hartten LM, Delany AC (1998) The Flatland boundary layer experiments. Bull Am  Meteorol Soc 79: 419–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banakh VA, Smalikho IN (1999) Measurements of turbulent energy dissipation rate with a CW Doppler lidar in the atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Ocean Technol 16: 1044–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canut G, Lothon M, Said F (2009) Observation of entrainment at the interface between monsoon flow and Saharan Air Layer. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Caughey SJ, Palmer SG (1979) Some aspects of turbulence structure through the depth of the convective boundary layer. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 105: 811–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohn SA, Angevine WM (2000) Boundary layer height and entrainment zone thickness measured by lidars and wind-profiling radars. J Appl Meteorol 39: 1233–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohn SA, Mayor SD, Grund TM, Weckwerth TM, Sneff C (1998) The Lidars in Flat Terrain experiment LIFT. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 79: 1329–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conzemius RJ, Fedorovich E (2006) Dynamics of sheared convective boundary layer entrainment. Part I: methodology background and large-eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 63: 1151–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conzemius RJ, Fedorovich E (2007) Bulk models of the sheared convective boundary layer: Evaluation through large eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 64: 786–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emeis S, Schafer K, Munkel C (2008) Surface-based remote sensing of the mixing-layer height—a review. Meteorol Z 17: 621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimsdell AW, Angevine WM (1998) Convective boundary layer height measurement with wind profilers and comparison to cloud base. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15: 1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimsdell AW, Angevine WM (2002) Observations of the afternoon transition of the convective boundary layer. J Appl Meteorol 41: 3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grund CJ, Banta RM, George JL, Howell JN, Post MJ, Richter RA, Weickman AM (2001) High-resolution Doppler lidar for boundary layer and cloud research. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 18: 376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hageli P, Steyn DG, Strawbridge KB (2000) Spatial and temporal variability of mixed-layer depth and entrainment zone thickness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97: 47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hicks BB, Wesely ML (1981) Heat and momentum transfer characteristics of adjacent fields of soybeans and maize. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 20: 175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hogstrom U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78: 215–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Højstrup J (1982) Velocity spectra in the unstable planetary boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 39: 2239–2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaimal JC, Wyngaard JC, Coté OR (1972) Spectral characteristics of surface layer turbulence. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 98: 653–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaimal JC, Wyngaard JC, Haugen DA, Coté OR, Izumi Y (1976) Turbulence structure in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 33: 2152–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaimal JC, Eversole RA, Lenschow DH (1982) Spectral characteristics of the convective boundary-layer over uneven terrain. J Atmos Sci 39: 1098–1114Google Scholar
  21. Kàrmàn TV (1948) Progress in the statistical theory of turbulence. Proc Nat Akad Sci 34: 530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katul G, Chu C-R (1998) A theoretical and experimental investigation of energy-containing scales in the dynamic sublayer of boundary-layer flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 86: 279–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim S, Park S, Moeng CH (2003) Entrainment processes in the convective boundary layer with varying wind shear. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108: 221–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kristensen L, Lenschow DH, Kirkegaard P, Courtney M (1989) The spectral velocity tensor for homogeneous boundary layer turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 47: 149–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lammert A, Boesenberg J (2006) Determination of the convective boundary-layer height with laser remote sensing. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119: 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenschow DH (1974) Model of the height variation of the turbulence kinetic energy budget in the unstable planetary boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 31: 465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lenschow DH, Stankov BB (1986) Length scales in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 43: 1198–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lenschow DH, Wulfmeyer V, Senff C (2000) Measuring second- through fourth-order moments in noisy data. J Atmos Ocean Technol 17: 1330–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lothon M, Lenschow DH, Mayor S (2006) Coherence and scale of vertical velocity in the convective boundary-layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121: 521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahrt L, Lenschow DH (1976) Growth dynamics of the convective mixed layer. J Atmos Sci 33: 41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mann J (1994) The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence. J Fluid Mech 273: 141–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martucci G, Matthey R, Mitev V, Richner H (2007) Comparison between backscatter lidar and radiosonde measurements of the diurnal and nocturnal stratification in the lower troposphere. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 24: 1231–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Militzer JM, Michaelis MC, Semmer SR, Norris KS, Horst TW, Oncley SP, Delany AC, Brock FV (1995) Development of the prototype PAMIII/Flux-PAM surface meteorological station. In: Proceedings of the 9th symposium on meteorological observations and instrumentation, American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 490–494Google Scholar
  34. Paulson CA (1970) The mathematical representation of wind speed and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric boundary layer. J Appl Meterol 9: 857–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sullivan PP, Moeng CH, Stevens B, Lenschow DH, Mayor SD (1998) Structure of the entrainment zone capping the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 55: 3042–3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tennekes H (1973) A model for the dynamics of the inversion above a convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 30: 538–567Google Scholar
  37. Weckwerth T (1999) An observational study of the evolution of horizontal convective rolls. Mon Weather Rev 127: 2160–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White AB, Senff CJ, Banta RM (1999) A comparison of mixing depths observed by ground-based wind profilers and an airborne lidar. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 16: 584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilczak JM, Gossard EE, Neff WD, Eberhard WL (1996) Ground-based remote sensing of the atmospheric boundary layer: 25 years of progress. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78: 321–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Lothon
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Donald H. Lenschow
    • 3
  • Shane D. Mayor
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre de Recherches AtmosphériquesCampistrousFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Aérologie - CNRS UMR 5560Université de ToulouseToulouseFrance
  3. 3.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  4. 4.California State UniversityChicoUSA

Personalised recommendations