Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Source Emission Determination Using an Inverse-Dispersion Technique

  • Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inverse-dispersion calculations can be used to infer atmospheric emission rates through a combination of downwind gas concentrations and dispersion model predictions. With multiple concentration sensors downwind of a compound source (whose component positions are known) it is possible to calculate the component emissions. With this in mind, a field experiment was conducted to examine the feasibility of such multi-source inferences, using four synthetic area sources and eight concentration sensors arranged in different configurations. Multi-source problems tend to be mathematically ill-conditioned, as expressed by the condition number κ. In our most successful configuration (average κ = 4.2) the total emissions from all sources were deduced to within 10% on average, while component emissions were deduced to within 50%. In our least successful configuration (average κ = 91) the total emissions were calculated to within only 50%, and component calculations were highly inaccurate. Our study indicates that the most accurate multi-source inferences will occur if each sensor is influenced by only a single source. A “progressive” layout is the next best: one sensor is positioned to “see” only one source, the next sensor is placed to see the first source and another, a third sensor is placed to see the previous two plus a third, and so on. When it is not possible to isolate any sources κ is large and the accuracy of a multi-source inference is doubtful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crenna BP, Flesch TK, Wilson JD (2008) Influence of source–sensor geometry on multi-source emission rate estimates. Atmos Environ 42: 7373–7383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer AJ (1974) A review of flux–profile relationships. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 7: 363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flesch TK, Wilson JD (2005) Estimating tracer emissions with a backward Lagrangian stochastic technique. In: Hatfield JL, Baker JM (eds) Micrometeorology in agricultural systems. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 513–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesch TK, Wilson JD, Harper LA, Crenna BP, Sharpe RR (2004) Deducing ground-air emissions from observed trace gas concentrations: a field trial. J Appl Meteorol 43: 487–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 316

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerald CF, Wheatley PO (1984) Applied numerical analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, p 579

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper LA, Flesch TK, Powell JM, Coblentz WK, Jokela WE, Martin NP (2009) Ammonia emissions from dairy production in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci 92: 2326–2337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement. Oxford University Press, UK, p 289

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain MC, Desjardins RL (2005) The evaluation of a backward Lagrangian stochastic (bLS) model to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural sources using a synthetic tracer source. Agric For Meteorol 135: 61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnes KJ, Kissel DE, Kanemasu ET (1985) Estimating ammonia flux: a comparison between the integrated horizontal flux method and theoretical solutions of the diffusion profile. Agron J 77: 884–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson CA (1970) The mathematical representation of wind speed and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. J Appl Meteorol 9: 857–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical receipts: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 1235

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudykiewicz JA (1998) Application of adjoint tracer transport equations for evaluating source parameters. Atmos Environ 32: 3039–3050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert P, Frank A (2004) Source–receptor matrix calculation with a Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode. Atmos Chem Phys 4: 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GW (1996) Afternotes on numerical analysis. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, p 200

    Google Scholar 

  • Su F, Shao M, Cai X, Zeng L, Zhu T (2003) Estimates of methane emissions in Beijing using a backward trajectory inversion model. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 14: 43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson LC, Hirst B, Gibson G, Gillespie S, Jonathan P, Skeldon KD, Padgett MJ (2007) An improved algorithm for locating a gas source using inverse methods. Atmos Environ 41: 1128–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Thurtell GW, Kidd GE, Beauchamp EG (1982) Estimation of the rate of gaseous mass transfer from a surface source plot to the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 16: 1861–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee E (2008) Theory for reconstruction of an unknown number of contaminant sources using probabilistic inference. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 127: 359–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Flesch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flesch, T.K., Harper, L.A., Desjardins, R.L. et al. Multi-Source Emission Determination Using an Inverse-Dispersion Technique. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132, 11–30 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9387-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9387-1

Keywords

Navigation