Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the Entrainment Flux Ratio on the Relationship between Entrainment Rate and Convective Richardson Number

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The parameterization of the dimensionless entrainment rate (w e /w *) versus the convective Richardson number (Ri δθ ) is discussed in the framework of a first-order jump model (FOM). A theoretical estimation for the proportionality coefficient in this parameterization, namely, the total entrainment flux ratio, is derived. This states that the total entrainment flux ratio in FOM can be estimated as the ratio of the entrainment zone thickness to the mixed-layer depth, a relationship that is supported by earlier tank experiments, and suggesting that the total entrainment flux ratio should be treated as a variable. Analyses show that the variability of the total entrainment flux ratio is actually the effect of stratification in the free atmosphere on the entrainment process, which should be taken into account in the parameterization. Further examination of data from tank experiments and large-eddy simulations demonstrate that the different power laws for w e /w * versus Ri δθ can be interpreted as the variability of the total entrainment flux ratio. These results indicate that the dimensionless entrainment rate depends not only on the convective Richardson number but also upon the total entrainment flux ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angevine WM, Grimsdell AW and McKeen SA (1998). Entrainment results from the Flateland boundary layer experiments. J Geophys Res 103(D12): 13689–13701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts AK (1974). Reply to comment on the paper ‘Non-precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization’. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 100: 469–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts AK and Ball JH (1994). Budget analysis of FIFE 1987 sonde data. J Geophys Res 99: 3655–3666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts AK, Desjardins RL and MacPherson JI (1992). Budget analysis of the boundary layer grid flights during FIFE 1987. J Goephys Res 97: 18533–18546

    Google Scholar 

  • Boers RA (1989). A parameterization of the depth of the entrainment zone. J Appl Meteorol 28: 107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff JW (1979). Prediction of convective mixed-layer entrainment for realistic capping inversion structure. J Atmos Sci 36: 424–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff JW, Willis GE and Stochton BH (1980). Laboratory studies of the entrainment zone of a convectively mixed layer. J Fluid Mech 100: 41–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorovich E, Conzemius R and Mironov D (2004). Convective entrainment into a shear-free, linear stratified atmosphere: bulk models reevaluated through large eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 61(3): 281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamant C, Pelon J, Flamant PH and Durand P (1997). Lidar determination of the entrainment zone thickness at the top of the unstable marine atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83: 247–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägeli P, Steyn DG and Strawbridge KB (2000). Spatial and temporal variability of mixed-layer depth and entrainment zone thickness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97: 47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-W, Park S-U and Vila-Guerau de Arellano J (2006). Parameterization of entrainment in a sheared convective boundary layer using a first-order jump model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120: 455–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen DC and Lewellen WS (1998). Large-eddy boundary layer entrainment. J Atmos Sci 55: 2645–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly DK (1968). Models of cloud-topped mixed layer under a strong inversion. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 94: 292–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeng CH and Sullivan PP (1994). A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. J Atmos Sci 51: 999–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino D, Vila-Guerau de Arellano J and Kim S-W (2006). Representing sheared convective boundary layer by zeroth- and first-order jump models: large-eddy simulation verification. J Appl Meteorol Clim 45: 1224–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stull RB (1976). The energetics of entrainment across a density interface. J Atmos Sci 33: 1260–1267

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan PP, Moeng CH, Stevens B, Lenschow DH and Mayor SD (1998). Structure of the entrainment zone capping the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 55: 3042–3064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Jiang W, Chen Z and Yuan R (2005). A laboratory study of the turbulent velocity characteristics in the convective boundary layer. Adv Atmos Sci 22(5): 770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (1968). The influence of molecular diffusivity on turbulent entrainment parameterization across a density interface. J Fluid Mech 33: 639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (1973) Buoyancy effects in fluids. Cambridge University Press, 367 pp

  • Van Zanten MC, Duynkerke PG and Cuijpers JWM (1999). Entrainment parameterization in convective boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 56(6): 813–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilitinkevich SS (1991) Turbulent penetrative convection. Avebury Technical, 179 pp

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianning Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, J., Wang, Y. Effect of the Entrainment Flux Ratio on the Relationship between Entrainment Rate and Convective Richardson Number. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126, 237–247 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9231-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9231-4

Keywords

Navigation