Abstract
Turbulence statistics obtained by direct numerical simulations are analysed to investigate spatial heterogeneity within regular arrays of building-like cubical obstacles. Two different array layouts are studied, staggered and square, both at a packing density of \(\lambda_p=0.25\) . The flow statistics analysed are mean streamwise velocity (\(\overline{u}\)), shear stress (\(\overline{u^{\prime}w^{\prime}}\)), turbulent kinetic energy (k) and dispersive stress fraction (\(\tilde{u}\tilde{w}\)). The spatial flow patterns and spatial distribution of these statistics in the two arrays are found to be very different. Local regions of high spatial variability are identified. The overall spatial variances of the statistics are shown to be generally very significant in comparison with their spatial averages within the arrays. Above the arrays the spatial variances as well as dispersive stresses decay rapidly to zero. The heterogeneity is explored further by separately considering six different flow regimes identified within the arrays, described here as: channelling region, constricted region, intersection region, building wake region, canyon region and front-recirculation region. It is found that the flow in the first three regions is relatively homogeneous, but that spatial variances in the latter three regions are large, especially in the building wake and canyon regions. The implication is that, in general, the flow immediately behind (and, to a lesser extent, in front of) a building is much more heterogeneous than elsewhere, even in the relatively dense arrays considered here. Most of the dispersive stress is concentrated in these regions. Considering the experimental difficulties of obtaining enough point measurements to form a representative spatial average, the error incurred by degrading the sampling resolution is investigated. It is found that a good estimate for both area and line averages can be obtained using a relatively small number of strategically located sampling points.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104: 229–259
Cionco RM (1965) A mathematical model for air flow over a vegetative canopy. J Appl Meteorol 4: 517–522
Coceal O, Belcher SE (2004) A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 130:1349–1372
Coceal O, Thomas TG, Castro IP, Belcher SE (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121:491–519
Coceal O, Dobre A, Thomas TG (2007) Unsteady dynamics and organized structures from DNS over an idealized building canopy. Int J Climatol (in press) DOI: 10.1002/joc1549.
Macdonald RW, Griffiths RF, Hall DJ (1998) An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 32:1857–1864
Macdonald RW (2000) Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97:25–45
Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:261–304
Perry AE, Schofield WH, Joubert PN (1969) Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 37:383–413
Roth M, Salmond J, Satyanarayana A (2006) Methodological considerations regarding the measurement of turbulent fluxes in the urban roughness sublayer: the role of scintillometery. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121:351–375
Xie Z, Castro IP (2006) LES and RANS for turbulent flow over arrays of wall-mounted obstacles. Flow, Turbulence Combust 76:291–312
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coceal, O., Thomas, T.G. & Belcher, S.E. Spatial Variability of Flow Statistics within Regular Building Arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125, 537–552 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9206-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9206-5


