Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 425–447 | Cite as

Impact of coherent eddies on airborne measurements of vertical turbulent fluxes

  • Marie LothonEmail author
  • Fleur Couvreux
  • Sylvie Donier
  • Françoise Guichard
  • Pierre Lacarrère
  • Donald H. Lenschow
  • Joël Noilhan
  • Frédérique Saïd
Original Paper


During the Hydrological-Atmospheric Pilot Experiment (HAPEX)-Sahel, which took place in Niger in the transitional period between the wet and dry seasons, two French aircraft probed the Sahelian boundary layer to measure sensible and latent heat fluxes. The measurements over the Niamey area often revealed organised structures of a few km scale that were associated with both thermals and dry intrusions. We study the impact of these coherent structures using a single day’s aircraft-measured fluxes and a numerical simulation of that day with a mesoscale model. The numerical simulation at high horizontal resolution (250 m) contains structures that evolve from streaks in the early morning to cells by noon. This simulation shows distribution, variance and skewness similar to the observations. In particular, the numerical simulation shows dry intrusions that can penetrate deeply into the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), and even reach the surface in some cases, which is in accordance with the observed highly negatively skewed water vapour fluctuations. Dry intrusions and thermals organised at a few km scale give skewed flux statistics and can introduce large errors in measured fluxes. We use the numerical simulation to: (i) evaluate the contribution of the organised structures to the total flux, and (ii) estimate the impact of the organised structures on the systematic and random errors resulting from the 1D sampling of the aircraft as opposed to the 2D numerical simulation estimate. We find a significant contribution by the organised structures to the total resolved fluxes. When rolls occur, and for a leg length of about 30 times the ABL depth, the 1D sampled flux is shown to be sometimes 20% lower than the corresponding 2D flux when the 1D sampling direction is the same as the main axis of the rolls, whereas the systematic error is much lower when the direction of the leg is transverse to the rolls. In the case of cells, an underestimate of around 10% can still be observed with the 1D approach independent of direction, due to poor sampling of the energy-containing scales.


Aircraft measurements Heat fluxes Mesoscale model Organised structures Sahelian boundary layer 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berg LK and Stull RB (2004). Parametrization of joint frequency distributions of potential temperature and water vapor mixing ratio in the daytime convecctive boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 61: 813–828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard-Trottolo S, Campistron B, Druilhet A, Lohou F and Said F (2003). TRAC08: Detection of coherent structures in a convective boundary layer using airborne measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111: 181–224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bougeault P and Lacarrère P (1989). Parametrization of orography-induced turbulence in a mesobeta-scale model. Mon Wea Rev 117: 1872–1890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Couvreux F, Guichard F, Redelsperger JL, Kiemle C, Masson V, Lafore JP and Flamant C (2005). Water–vapour variability within a convective boundary-layer assessed by large-eddy simulations and IHOP-2002 observations. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 131: 2665–2693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Couvreux F, Guichard F, Redelsperger JL and Masson V (2007). Negative water vapour skewness and dry tongues in the convective boundary layer: observations and LES budget analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123(2): 269–294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuxart J, Bougeault P and Redelsperger JL (2000). A turbulence scheme allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 26: 1–30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goutorbe JP, Dolman AJ, Gash JHC, Kerr YH, Lebel T, Prince SD, Stricker JNM (1997) HAPEX-Sahel. Elsevier (reprinted from J Hydrol 1079 pp 188–189/1-4)Google Scholar
  8. Grunwald J, Kalthoff N, Fiedler F and Corsmeier U (1998). Application of different flight strategies to determine areally average turbulent fluxes. Contr Atmos Phys 71: 283–302 Google Scholar
  9. Halpert MS, Ropelewski CF (1992) Fourth Annual Climate Assessment. Climate Analysis Center. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA/NWS/NMC, 90 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanda M, Inagaki A, Letzel MO, Raasch S and Watanabe T (2004). Les study of the energy imbalance problem with eddy covariance fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 110: 381–404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacaze R, Donier S, Lacarrère P and Roujean JL (2003). AVHRR-derived land surface conditions for flux simulations with a meso-scale model over the HAPEX-SAHEL study area. J Appl Meteorol 42: 686–700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lafore JP, Stein J, Asencio N, Bougeault P, Ducrocq V, Duron J, Fischer C, Héreil P, Mascart P, Redelsperger JL, Richard E and Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J (1998). The Meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: Adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann Geophys 109: 16–90 Google Scholar
  13. LeMone MA, Zhou M, Moeng CH, Lenschow DH, Miller LJ and Grossman RL (1999). An observational study of wind profiles in the baroclinic convective mixed layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90: 47–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenschow DH, Mann J and Kristensen L (1994). How long is long enough when measuring fluxes and other turbulence statistics. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 11: 661–673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenschow DH and Stankov BB (1986). Length scales in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 43: 1198–1209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lohou F, Druilhet A and Campistron B (1998). Spatial and temporal characteristics of horizontal rolls and cells in the atmospheric boundary layer based on radar and in situ observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 89: 407–444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lohou F, Druilhet A, Campistron B, Redelsperger JL and Saïd F (2000). Numerical study of the impact of coherent structures on vertical transfers in the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97: 361–383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahrt L (1991). Boundary-layer moisture regimes. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 117: 151–176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masson V, Champeaux JL, Chauvin F, Meriguet C and Lacaze R (2003). A global database of land surface parameters at 1-km resolution in meteorological and climate models. J Climate 16: 1261–1282 Google Scholar
  20. Noilhan J and Planton S (1989). A simple parametrization of land surface processus for meteorological models. Mon Wea Rev 117: 536–549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parker DJ, Burton RR, Diongue-Niang A, Ellis RJ, Felton MA, Taylor CM, Thorncroft CD, Bessemoulin P and Tompkins AM (2005). The diurnal cycle of the west African monsoon circulation. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 611: 2839–2860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Redelsperger JL and Sommeria G (1986). Three-dimensional simulation of a convective storm: Sensitivity studies on subgrid parameterization and spatial resolution. J Atmos Sci 43: 2619–2635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saïd F, Attié JL, Bénech B, Druilhet A, Durand P, Marciniak MH and Monteny B (1997). Spatial variability in airborne surface flux measurements during HAPEX-Sahel. J Hydrol 188–189: 878–911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor CM, Harding RJ, Thorpe AJ and Bessemoulin P (1997). A mesoscale simulation of land surface heterogeneity from HAPEX-Sahel. J Hydrol 188–189: 1040–1066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wai MMK, Smith EA, Bessemoulin P, Culf AD, Dolman AJ and Lebel T (1997). Variability in boundary-layer structure during HAPEX-Sahel wet-dry season transition. J Hydrol 188–189: 965–997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weckwerth T (1995) A study of horizontal convective rolls occurring within clear-air convective boundary layers. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  27. Weckwerth T (1997). Horizontal convective rolls: determining the environmental conditions supporting their existence and characteristics. Mon Wea Rev 125: 505–526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weckwerth T (1999). An observational study of the evolution of horizontal convective rolls. Mon Wea Rev 127: 2160–2179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weckwerth T, Parsons DB, Koch SE, Moore JA, Demoz BB, Flamant C, Geers B, Wang J and Feltz WF (2004). An overview of the international H20 project (IHOP_2002) and some preliminary highlights. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85: 253–277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams AG and Hacker JM (1992). The composite shape and structure of coherent eddies in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61: 213–245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wyngaard JC (1983). Lectures on the planetary boundary layer. In: Gal-Chen, T and Lilly, DK (eds) Mesoscale meteorology theories, observations and models., pp 781. D. Reidel, Publ. Co., Dordrecht Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Lothon
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Fleur Couvreux
    • 3
  • Sylvie Donier
    • 3
  • Françoise Guichard
    • 3
  • Pierre Lacarrère
    • 3
  • Donald H. Lenschow
    • 4
  • Joël Noilhan
    • 3
  • Frédérique Saïd
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre de Recherches AtmosphériquesCampistrousFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Aérologie, UMR 5560 CNRSUniversité Paul Sabatier Toulouse IIIToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Météo-France/CNRMToulouseFrance
  4. 4.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations