Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 405–424 | Cite as

Study of near-surface models for large-eddy simulations of a neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer

  • Inanc SenocakEmail author
  • Andrew S. Ackerman
  • Michael P. Kirkpatrick
  • David E. Stevens
  • Nagi N. Mansour
Original Paper


In large-eddy simulations (LES) of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), near-surface models are often used to supplement subgrid-scale (SGS) turbulent stresses when a major fraction of the energetic scales within the surface layer cannot be resolved with the temporal and spatial resolution at hand. In this study, we investigate the performance of both dynamic and non-dynamic eddy viscosity models coupled with near-surface models in simulations of a neutrally stratified ABL. Two near-surface models that are commonly used in LES of the atmospheric boundary layer are considered. Additionally, a hybrid Reynolds- averaged/LES eddy viscosity model is presented, which uses Prandtl’s mixing length model in the vicinity of the surface, and blends in with the dynamic Smagorinsky model away from the surface. Present simulations show that significant portions of the modelled turbulent stresses are generated by the near-surface models, and they play a dominant role in capturing the expected logarithmic wind profile. Visualizations of the instantaneous vorticity field reveal that flow structures in the vicinity of the surface depend on the choice of the near-surface model. Among the three near-surface models studied, the hybrid eddy viscosity model gives the closest agreement with the logarithmic wind profile in the surface layer. It is also observed that high levels of resolved turbulence stresses can be maintained with the so-called canopy stress model while producing good agreement with the logarithmic wind profile.


Atmospheric boundary layer Dynamic models Large-eddy simulations Near-surface models 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abe K (2005). A hybrid LES/RANS approach using an anisotropy-resolving albegraic turbulence model. Int. J Heat Fluid Flow 26: 204–222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andren A, Brown AR, Graf J, Mason PJ, Moeng C-H, Nieuwstadt FTM and Schuman U (1994). Large-eddy simulation of a neutrally stratified boundary layer: A comparison of four computer codes. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 120: 1457–1484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaras E, Benocci C and Piomelli U (1996). Two-layer approximate boundary conditions for large-eddy simulation.. AIAA J. 34: 1111–1119 Google Scholar
  4. Bell JB and Marcus DL (1992). A second-order projection method for variable-density flows. J Comput Phys 101:   334–348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohnert M (1993) A numerical investigation of cloud-topped planetary boundary layers. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown AR, Hobson JM and Wood N (2001). Large-eddy simulation of neutral turbulent flow over rough sinusoidal ridges. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 98: 411–441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabot W (1997) Wall models in large-eddy simulation of seperated flow. Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, NASA-Ames/Stanford University, 97–106.Google Scholar
  8. Cabot W and Moin P (2000). Approximate wall boundary conditions in the large-eddy simulation of high Reynolds number flow. Flow Turbul Combust 63: 269–291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabot W, Jimenez J, Baggett JS (1999) On wakes and near-wall behavior in coarse large-eddy simulation of channel flow with wall models and second-order finite difference methods. Annual research briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, NASA-Ames/Stanford University, pp 343–354Google Scholar
  10. Cederwall RT (2002) Large-eddy simulation of the evolving stable boundary layer ovver flat terrain. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 231 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Chow FK, Street RL, Xue M and Ferziger JH (2005). Explicit filtering and reconstruction turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of neutral boundary layer flow. J Atmos Sci 62: 2058–2077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drobinski P, Carlotti P, Newsom RK, Banta RM, Foster RC and Redelsperger J (2004). The structure of the near neutral atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci 61:   699–714 Google Scholar
  13. Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press UK, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P and Cabot WH (1991). A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids 3: 1760–1765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghosal S, Lund TS, Moin P and Akselvoll K (1995). A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 286: 229–255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobson JM, Wood N and Brown AR (1999). Large-eddy simulations of neutrally stratified flow over surfaces with spatially varying roughness length. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 125: 1937–1958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hogstrom U, Hunt J and Smedman A-S (2002). Theory and measurements for turbulence spectra and variances in the atmospheric neutral surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103: 101–124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirkpatrick MP, Ackerman AS, Stevens DE and Mansour NN (2006). On the application of the dynamic Smagorinsky model to large-eddy simulations of the cloud-topped atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 63: 526–546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kosovic B (1997). Subgrid-scale modelling for the large-eddy simulation of high-Reynolds number boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 336: 151–182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lilly DK (1992). A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys Fluids 4: 633–635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mason PJ (1994). Large-eddy simulation: A critical review of the technique. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 120: 1–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason PJ and Brown AR (1999). On subgrid models and filter operations in large eddy simulation. J Atmos Sci 56: 2101–2114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mason P and Callen N (1986). On the magnitude of the subgrid-scale eddy coefficient in large-eddy simulations of turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 162: 439–462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mason P and Thomson D (1992). Stochastic backscatter in large-eddy simulations of boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 242: 51–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moeng CH (1984). A large-eddy simulation model for the study of planetary boundary layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 41: 2052–2062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Panofsky HA (1974). The atmospheric boundary layer below 150 meters. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 6: 147–177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Panofsky HA, Dutton JA (1984) Atmospheric turbulence John Wiley, New York, 397 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Porte-Agel F, Meneveau C and Parlange MB (2000). A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 415: 261–284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prandtl L (1925). Bericht uber die Entstehung der Turbulenz. Z Angew Math Mech 5: 136–139 Google Scholar
  30. Sagaut P (2002) Large Eddy simulation for incompressible flows. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 426 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Schumann U (1975). Subgrid-scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and annuli. J Comput Phys 18: 376–404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smagorinsky J (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon Wea Rev 91: 99–164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stevens DE and Bretherton CS (1996). A forward-in-time advection scheme and adaptive multilevel flow solver for nearly incompressible atmospheric flow. J Comput Phys 129: 284–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevens B and Lenschow DH (2001). Observations, experiments and large eddy simulation. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 82: 283–294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevens DE, Bell JB, Almgren AS, Beckner VE and Rendleman CA (2000). Small-scale processes and entrainment in a stratocumulus marine boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 57: 567–581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Sullivan PP, McWilliams JC and Moeng CH (1994). A subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary layer flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 71: 247–276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sullivan PP, Horst TW, Lenschow DH, Moeng C-H and Weil JC (2003). Structure of subfilter-scale fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer with application to large-eddy simulation modelling. J Fluid Mech 482: 101–139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Temmerman L, Hadziabdic M, Leschziner MA and Hanjalic K (2005). A hybrid two-layer URANS-LES approach for large eddy simulation at high Reynolds numbers. Int J Heat Fluid Fl 26: 173–190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. vanDriest ER (1956). On turbulent flow near a wall. J. Aero. Sci. 23: 1007–1011 Google Scholar
  41. Wang M and Moin P (1992). Dynamic wall modeling for large-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. Phys Fluids 14: 2043–2051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wyngaard JC, Peltier LJ and Khanna S (1998). LES in the surface layer: Surface fluxes, scaling, and SGS modeling. J Atmos Sci 55: 1733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xiao X, Edwards JR and Hassan HA (2004). Blending functions in hybrid Large-eddy/Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulations.. AIAA J. 42: 2508–2515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inanc Senocak
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Andrew S. Ackerman
    • 3
  • Michael P. Kirkpatrick
    • 4
  • David E. Stevens
    • 5
  • Nagi N. Mansour
    • 6
  1. 1.Center for Turbulence ResearchNASA-Ames/Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Los Alamos National Laboratory Mail stop k575Los AlamosUSA
  3. 3.NASA Goddard Institute for Space StudiesNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic EngineeringUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUSA
  6. 6.NASA Ames Research CenterMoffett FieldUSA

Personalised recommendations