Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determining carbon isotope signatures from micrometeorological measurements: Implications for studying biosphere–atmosphere exchange processes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years considerable effort has been focused on combining micrometeorological and stable isotope techniques to partition net fluxes and to study biosphere–atmosphere exchange processes. While much progress has been achieved over the last decade, some new issues are beginning to emerge as technological advances, such as laser spectroscopy, permit isotopic fluxes to be measured more easily and continuously in the field. Traditional investigations have quantified the isotopic composition of biosphere-atmosphere exchange by using the Keeling two-member mixing model (the classic Keeling plot). An alternative method, based on a new capacity to measure isotopic mixing ratios, is to determine the isotope composition of biosphere–atmosphere exchange from the ratio of flux measurements. The objective of this study was to critically evaluate these methods for quantifying the isotopic composition of ecosystem respiration (δR) over a period of three growing seasons (2003–2005) within a heterogeneous landscape consisting of C3 and C4 species. For C4 canopies, the mixing model approach produced δR values that were 4–6‰ lower (isotopically lighter) than the flux-gradient method. The analyses presented here strongly suggest that differences between flux and concentration footprint functions are the main factor influencing the inequality between the mixing model and flux-gradient approaches. A mixing model approach, which is based on the concentration footprint, can have a source area influence more than 20-fold greater than the flux footprint. These results highlight the fact that isotopic flux partitioning is susceptible to problems arising from combining signals (concentration and fluxes) that represent very different spatial scales (footprint). This problem is likely to be most pronounced within heterogeneous terrain. However, even under ideal conditions, the mismatch between concentration and flux footprints could have a detrimental impact on isotopic flux partitioning where very small differences in isotopic signals must be resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker JM, Griffis TJ (2005) Examining strategies to improve the carbon balance of corn/soybean agriculture using eddy covariance and mass balance techniques. Agric For Meteorol 128:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling DR, Burns SP, Conway TJ, Monson RK, White JWC (2005) Extensive observations of CO2 carbon isotope content in and above a high-elevation subalpine forest. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19(3), Art. No. GB3023

  • Bowling DR, Sargent SD, Tanner BD, Ehleringer JR (2003) Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy for stable isotope studies of ecosystem–atmosphere CO2 exchange. Agric For Meteorol 118:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling DR, Tans PP, Monson RK (2001) Partitioning net ecosystem carbon exchange with isotopic fluxes of CO2. Global Change Biol 7:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, Schimel DS, Tans PP (1999) A global calculation of the δ13C of soil respired carbon: Implications for the biospheric uptake of anthropogenic CO2. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrsin S (1974) Limitations of gradient transport models in random walks and turbulence. In: Frenkiel FN, Munn RE (eds) Turbulent diffusion in environmental pollution. Academic Press, New York, pp 25–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmead OT, Bradley EF (1985) Flux-gradient relationships in a forest canopy. In: Hutchinson BA, Hicks BB (eds) The forest–atmosphere interaction. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 421–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan LB, Kubien DS, Ehleringer JR (1999) Spatial and temporal variation in the carbon and oxygen stable isotope ratio of respired CO2 in a boreal forest ecosystem. Tellus 51B:367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesch TK, Wilson JD, Yee E (1995) Backward-time Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models and their application to estimate gaseous emissions. J Appl Meteorol 34:1320–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung I, Field CB, Berry JA, Thompson MV, Randerson JT, Malmstrom CM, Vitousek PM, Collatz GJ, Sellers PJ, Randall DA, Denning AS, Badeck F, John J (1997) Carbon 13 exchanges between the atmosphere and biosphere. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 11:507–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffis TJ, Baker JM, Sargent S, Tanner BD, Zhang J (2004) Measuring field-scale isotopic CO2 fluxes using tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy and micrometeorological techniques. Agric For Meteorol 124:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffis TJ, Baker JM, Zhang J (2005a) Seasonal dynamics of isotopic CO2 exchange in C3/C4 managed ecosystem. Agric For Meteorol 132:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffis TJ, Lee X, Baker JM, Sargent S, King JY (2005b) Feasibility of quantifying ecosystem- atmosphere C18O16O exchange using laser spectroscopy and the flux-gradient method. Agric For Meteorol 135:44–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, 289 pp

  • Keeling CD (1958) The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 13:322–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kljun N, Kastner-Klein P, Fedorovich E, Rotach MW (2004) Evaluation of Lagrangian footprint model using data from wind tunnel convective boundary layer. Agric For Meteorol 127:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kljun N, Rotach MW, Schmid HP (2002) A three-dimensional backward lagrangian footprint model for a wide range of boundary-layer stratifications. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103:205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knohl A, Werner RA, Brand WA, Buchmann N (2005) Short-term variations in δ13C of ecosystem respiration reveals link between assimilation and respiration in a deciduous forest. Oecologia 142:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai CT, Ehleringer JR, Tans P, Wofsy SC, Urbanski SP, Hollinger DY (2004) Estimating photosynthetic C-13 discrimination in terrestrial CO2 exchange from canopy to regional scales. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18(1), Art. No. GB1041.

  • Lai CT, Schauer AJ, Owensby, C, Ham JM, Ehleringer JR (2003) Isotopic air sampling in a tallgrass prairie to partition net ecosystem CO2 exchange. J Geophys Res 108(D18), Art. No. 4566

  • Lee X (2003) Fetch and footprint of turbulent fluxes over vegetative stands with elevated sources. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee XH (2004) A model for scalar advection inside canopies and application to footprint investigations. Agric For Meteorol 127:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee X, Smith R, Williams J (2006) Water vapour 18O/16O isotope ratio in surface air in New England USA. Tellus 58B:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J, Kruijt B, Hollinger DY, Grace J, Francey RJ, Wong SC, Kelliher FM, Miranda AC, Farquhar GD, Gash JHC, Vygodskaya NN, Wright IR, Miranda HS, Schulze ED (1996) Vegetation effects on the isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2 at local and regional scales: theoretical aspects and a comparison between rain forest in amazonia and a boreal forest in Siberia. Aust J Plant Physiol 23:371–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner FJ (1974) The original vegetation of Minnesota. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN. (Redraft of the original 1930 edition)

  • Meyers TP, Hall ME, Lindberg SE, Kim K (1996) Use of the modified bowen-ratio technique to measure fluxes of trace gases. Atmos Environ 30(19): 3321–3329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogée J, Peylin P, Ciais P, Bariac T, Brunet Y, Berbigier P, Roche C, Richard P, Bardoux G, Bonnefond JM (2003) Partitioning net ecosystem carbon exchange into net assimilation and respiration using (CO2)-C-13 measurements: a cost-effective sampling strategy. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17(2), Art. No. 1070

  • Ogée J, Peylin P, Cuntz M, Bariac T, Brunet Y, Berbigier P, Richard P, Ciais P (2004) Partitioning net ecosystem carbon exchange into net assimilation and respiration with canopy-scale isotopic measurements: an error propagation analysis with (CO2)-C-13 and (COO)-O-18 data. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18(2), Art. No. GB2019

  • Ometto JPHB, Flanagan LB, Martinelli LA, Moreira MZ, Higuchi N, Ehleringer JR (2002) Carbon isotope discrimination in forest and pasture ecosystems of the Amazon Basin, Brazil. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 16(4), Art. No. 1109

  • Pataki DE, Ehleringer JR, Flanagan LB, Yakir D, Bowling DR, Still CJ, Buchmann N, Kaplan JO, Berry JA (2003) The application and interpretation of Keeling plots in terrestrial carbon cycle research. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17(1), Art. No. 1022

  • Randerson JT, Still CJ, Balle JJ, Fung IY, Doney SC, Tans PP, Conway TJ, White JWC, Vaughn B, Suits N, Denning AS (2002) Carbon isotope discrimination of arctic and boreal biomes inferred from remote atmospheric measurements and a biosphere–atmosphere model 9. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 16(3), Art. No. 1028

  • Raupach MR (1989) Stand overstorey processes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 324:175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P, Flanagan LB, Gregorich EG (1999) Separating soil respiration into plant and soil components using analyses of the natural abundance of carbon-13. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1207–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotach MW (2001) Simulation of urban-scale dispersion using a Lagrangian stochastic dispersion model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99:379–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP (1994) Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 67:293–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP (2002) Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: a review and perspective. Agric For Meteorol 113:159–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1326 pp

  • Simpson IJ, Thurtell GW, Neumann HH, den Hartog G, Edwards GC (1998) The validity of similarity theory in the roughness sublayer above forests. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87:69–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tans PP, Berry JA, Keeling RF (1993) Oceanic 13C/12C observation: a new window on ocean CO2 uptake. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 7:353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff BL (1986) Sampling error in a single-instrument vertical gradient measurement in the atmospheric surface layer. MS thesis, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, USA, 79 pp

  • Yakir D, Sternberg LDL (2000) The use of stable isotopes to study ecosystem gas exchange. Oecologia 123:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakir D, Wang XF (1996) Fluxes of CO2 and water fluxes between terrestrial vegetation and the atmosphere estimated from isotope measurements. Nature 380:515–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yepez EA, Williams DG, Scott RL, Lin GH (2003) Partitioning overstory and understory evapotranspiration in a semiarid savanna woodland from the isotopic composition of water vapor. Agric For Meteorol 119:53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Griffis TJ, Baker JM (2006) Using continuous stable isotope measurements to partition net ecosystem CO2 exchange. Plant Cell Environ 29:483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobitz JM, Keener JP, Schnyder H, Bowling DR (2006) Sensitivity analysis and quantification of uncertainty for isotopic mixing relationships in carbon cycle research. Agric For Meteorol 136:56–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    T. J. Griffis, J. Zhang, J. M. Baker & K. Billmark

  2. United States Department of Agriculture – Agriculture, Research Service, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    J. M. Baker

  3. Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    N. Kljun

Authors
  1. T. J. Griffis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. M. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Kljun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Billmark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. J. Griffis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffis, T.J., Zhang, J., Baker, J.M. et al. Determining carbon isotope signatures from micrometeorological measurements: Implications for studying biosphere–atmosphere exchange processes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123, 295–316 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9143-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9143-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation