Skip to main content

Low density culture of mammalian primary neurons in compartmentalized microfluidic devices

Biomedical Microdevices volume 21, Article number: 67 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the fabrication of a compartmentalized microfluidic device with docking sites to position a single neuron or a cluster of 5–6 neurons along with varying length of microgrooves and the optimization process for culturing primary mammalian neurons at low densities. The principle of centrifugation was employed to situate cells in desired locations followed by the application of a fluid flow to remove the extra or unwanted cells lying in the vicinity of the located neurons. The neuronal cell density was optimized by seeding 103 cells and 104 cells/microfluidic device. The speed of centrifugation was optimized as 1500 rpm for 1 min and a cell density of greater than or equal to 104 cells/microfluidic device was found to be suitable for loading maximum number of docking sites. The outcomes of the simulated experiments was found to be in compliance with the experimemtal verifications. Furthermore, the cells cultured within the microfluidic device were assessed for immunocytochemical staining and the axonal growth was quantified with the help of an Axofluidic software. Although, several in vitro microfluidic platforms have been developed that facilitate the investigations where communication between neurons or between neurons and other cell types is concerned, none of the partitioned devices so far has reported the presence of docking sites along with an array of grooves of varying lengths. These physically connected but fluidically isolated compartmentalized microfluidic devices may serve us in analysing the activity of a low density of neurons and the influence of axonal length in setting up a communication with other cell type.This platform is useful to gain insights into the processes of synapse formation, axonal guidance, cell-cell interaction, to name a few.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • C.A. Blizzard, K.A. Southam, E. Dawkins, K.E. Lewis, A.E. King, J.A. Clark, T.C. Dickson, Dis. Model. Mech. 8, 215 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Chevalier-Larsen, E.L.F. Holzbaur, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 1762, 1094 (2006)

  • I. Dupin, M. Dahan, V. Studer, J. Neurosci. 33, 17647 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Friede, M. Benda, A. Dewitz, P. Stoll, J. Neurol. Sci. 63, 369 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Garcia-Lopez, V. Garcia-Marin, M. Freire, Front. Neuroanat. 4, 1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Gu, B. Black, S. Ordonez, A. Mondal, A. Jain, S. Mohanty, Sci. Rep. 4, 6457 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.D. Jadhav, L. Wei, P. Shi, Curr. Neuropharmacol. 14, 72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Jain, M.U. Gillette, Microfluidic and Compartmentalized Platforms for Neurobiological Research (Humana Press, New York, 2015), pp. 127–137

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kaiser, C.C. Hilgetag, A. van Ooyen, Cereb. Cortex 19, 3001 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Katchinskiy, H.R. Goez, I. Dutta, R. Godbout, A.Y. Elezzabi, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016)

  • Y. Lei, J. Li, N. Wang, X. Yang, Y. Hamada, Q. Li, W. Zheng, X. Jiang, Int Bio (Cam) 8, 359 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.-T. Li, S.-H. Zhang, X.-Y. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, A.I. Oleinick, I. Svir, C. Amatore, W.-H. Huang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 9313 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Z. Lu, M. Piechowicz, S. Qiu, J. Vis. Exp. (2016)

  • S.K. Mahto, Int. J. Biosen. Bioelectron. 2 (2017)

  • S.K. Mahto, H. Song, S.W. Rhee, BioChip J 5, 289 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Neto, C.J. Alves, D.M. Sousa, I.S. Alencastre, A.H. Lourenço, L. Leitão, H.R. Ryu, N.L. Jeon, R. Fernandes, P. Aguiar, R.D. Almeida, M. Lamghari, Integr. Biol. 6, 586 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Neto, L. Leitão, D.M. Sousa, C.J. Alves, I.S. Alencastre, P. Aguiar, M. Lamghari, J. Neurosci. 36, 11573 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Park, H.J. Kim, J.H. Byun, H.R. Ryu, N.L. Jeon, Biotechnol. J. 4, 1573 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Perge, J.E. Niven, E. Mugnaini, V. Balasubramanian, P. Sterling, J. Neurosci. 32, 626 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Raper, C. Mason, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, 1 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.T. Roppongi, K.P. Champagne-Jorgensen, T.J. Siddiqui, J. Vis. Exp. (2017)

  • N. Santhanam, L. Kumanchik, X. Guo, F. Sommerhage, Y. Cai, M. Jackson, C. Martin, G. Saad, C.W. McAleer, Y. Wang, A. Lavado, C.J. Long, J.J. Hickman, Biomaterials 166, 64 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D.J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, A. Cardona, Nat. Methods 9, 676 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.D. Sigerson, C.J. Dipollina, M. Fornaro, Neural Regen. Res. 11, 220 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.A. Southam, A.E. King, C.A. Blizzard, G.H. McCormack, T.C. Dickson, J. Neurosci. Methods 218, 164 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.M. Taylor, S.W. Rhee, C.H. Tu, D.H. Cribbs, C.W. Cotman, N.L. Jeon, Langmuir 19, 1551 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.G.M. Uzel, R.J. Platt, V. Subramanian, T.M. Pearl, C.J. Rowlands, V. Chan, L.A. Boyer, P.T.C. So, R.D. Kamm, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501429 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. Xia and G. M. Whitesides, 33 (1998)

  • S. Yogev, R. Cooper, R. Fetter, M. Horowitz, K. Shen, Neuron 92, 449 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by a DST-INSPIRE (DST/INSPIRE/04/2013/000836) research grant from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. The authors would also like to thank Institute Research Project (IRP) scheme for individual faculty provided by Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University) for the development of state-of-the-art facilities. The microfabrication processes were performed using facilities at Centre for Nanoscience and Engineering (CeNSE), Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru under Indian Nanoelectronics User’s Program funded by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tissue Engineering and Biomicrofluidics Laboratory, School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India

    Suruchi Poddar, Mrugesh Krishna Parasa, Kiran Yellappa Vajanthri, Anjali Chaudhary, Utkarsh Vinodchandra Pancholi & Sanjeev Kumar Mahto

  2. Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S Martin Jischke Dr, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Mrugesh Krishna Parasa

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India

    Arnab Sarkar

  4. School of Biochemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India

    Ashish Kumar Singh

  5. Centre for Advanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India

    Sanjeev Kumar Mahto

Authors
  1. Suruchi Poddar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mrugesh Krishna Parasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kiran Yellappa Vajanthri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anjali Chaudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Utkarsh Vinodchandra Pancholi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Arnab Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ashish Kumar Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sanjeev Kumar Mahto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev Kumar Mahto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 296 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poddar, S., Parasa, M.K., Vajanthri, K.Y. et al. Low density culture of mammalian primary neurons in compartmentalized microfluidic devices. Biomed Microdevices 21, 67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-019-0400-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-019-0400-2

Keywords

  • Microfluidic devices
  • Primary neurons
  • Single-cell analysis
  • Axonal guidance
  • Docking sites