Microfluidic gradient PCR (MG-PCR): a new method for microfluidic DNA amplification
- 412 Downloads
This study develops a new microfluidic DNA amplification strategy for executing parallel DNA amplification in the microfluidic gradient polymerase chain reaction (MG-PCR) device. The developed temperature gradient microfluidic system is generated by using an innovative fin design. The device mainly consists of modular thermally conductive copper flake which is attached onto a finned aluminum heat sink with a small fan. In our microfluidic temperature gradient prototype, a non-linear temperature gradient is produced along the gradient direction. On the copper flake of length 45 mm, width 40 mm and thickness 4 mm, the temperature gradient easily spans the range from 97 to 52°C. By making full use of the hot (90–97°C) and cold (60–70°C) regions on the temperature gradient device, the parallel, two-temperature MG-PCR amplification is feasible. As a demonstration, the MG-PCR from three parallel reactions of 112-bp Escherichia coli DNA fragment is performed in a continuous-flow format, in which the flow of the PCR reagent in the closed loop is induced by the buoyancy-driven nature convection. Although the prototype is not optimized, the MG-PCR amplification can be completed in less than 45 min. However, the MG-PCR thermocycler presented herein can be further scaled-down, and thus the amplification times and reagent consumption can be further reduced. In addition, the currently developed temperature gradient technology can be applied onto other continuous-flow MG-PCR systems or used for other analytical purposes such as parallel and combination measurements, and fluorescent melting curve analysis.
KeywordsMicrofluidic gradient PCR (MG-PCR) Microfluidic DNA amplification Continuous-flow Temperature gradient Nature convection
- D.J. Kinahan, T.M. Dalton, M.R.D. Davies, Biomed. Microdevices 11(4), 747–754 (2009)Google Scholar
- N. Stoffel, A. Fisher, S.S. Tan, M. Boysel, Proceedings of 57th Electronic Components & Technology Conference, Reno, NV, 2007, pp, 1561-1566 (2007)Google Scholar
- W. Sybesma, J. Hugenholtz, I. Mierau, M. Kleerebezem, Biotechniques 31, 466, 468, 470, 472 (2001)Google Scholar
- P. Wilding, M.A. Shoffner, L.J. Kricka, Clin. Chem. 40, 1815–1818 (1994)Google Scholar