Biomedical Microdevices

, 11:1259 | Cite as

Computational simulation of a magnetic microactuator for tissue engineering applications

  • Joseph Keyes
  • Michael Junkin
  • Pak Kin Wong
  • Jonathan P. Vande Geest


The next generation of tissue engineered constructs (TECs) requires the incorporation of a controllable and optimized microstructure if they are to chemically, mechanically, and biologically mimic tissue function. In order to obtain TECs with optimized microstructures, a combination of spatiotemporally regulated mechanical and biochemical stimuli is necessary during the formation of the construct. While numerous efforts have been made to create functional tissue constructs, there are few techniques available to stimulate TECs in a localized manner. We herein describe the design of a microdevice which can stimulate TECs in a localized, inhomogeneous, and predefined anisotropic fashion using ferromagnetically doped polydimethylsiloxane microflaps (MFs). Specifically, a sequential magneto-structural finite element model of the proposed microdevice is constructed and utilized to understand how changes in magnetic and geometrical properties of the device affect MF deflection. Our study indicates that a relatively small density of ferromagnetic material is required to result in adequate force and MF defection (175 μm ~7% TEC strain). We also demonstrate that MF to magnet distance is more important than inherent MF magnetic permeability in determining resulting MF deflection. An experimental validation test setup was used to validate the computational solutions. The comparison shows reasonable agreement indicating a 5.9% difference between experimentally measured and computationally predicted MF displacement. Correspondingly, an apparatus with two MFs and two magnets has been made and is currently undergoing construct testing. The current study presents the design of a novel magnetic microactuator for tissue engineering applications. The computational results reported here will form the foundation in the design and optimization of a functional microdevice with multiple MFs and magnets capable of stimulating TECs in nonhomogenous and preferred directions with relevant spatial resolution.


Tissue engineering Biomechanics Magnetic Microactuator Finite element 


  1. M. Eastwood, V.C. Mudera, D.A. McGrouther, R.A. Brown, Effect of precise mechanical loading on fibroblast populated collagen lattices: morphological changes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 40(1), 13–21 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. K. Kanda, T. Matsuda, Mechanical stress-induced orientation and ultrastructural change of smooth muscle cells cultured in three-dimensional collagen lattices. Cell Transplant 3(6), 481–92 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. D. Seliktar, R.A. Black, R.P. Vito, R.M. Nerem, Dynamic mechanical conditioning of collagen-gel blood vessel constructs induces remodeling in vitro. Ann Biomed Eng 28(4), 351–62 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. S.W. Liao, K. Hida, J.S. Park, S. Li, Mechanical regulation of matrix reorganization and phenotype of smooth muscle cells and mesenchymal stem cells in 3D matrix. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 7, 5024–7 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. G.E. Wnek, G.L. Bowlin, Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. Vol. Tissue Engineering of Skeletal Muscle. Informa Health Care. (2008)Google Scholar
  6. N. L'Heureux, S. Paquet, R. Labbe, L. Germain, F.A. Auger, A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. FASEB J 12(1), 47–56 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. J.A. McKee, S.S. Banik, M.J. Boyer, N.M. Hamad, J.H. Lawson, L.E. Niklason, C.M. Counter, Human arteries engineered in vitro. EMBO Rep 4(6), 633–8 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. L.E. Niklason, J. Gao, W.M. Abbott, K.K. Hirschi, S. Houser, R. Marini, R. Langer, Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science 284(5413), 489–93 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D.H. Kim, P.K. Wong, J. Park, A. Levchenko, and Y. Sun, Microengineered Platforms for Cell Mechanobiology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. (2009)Google Scholar
  10. D. Armani, Re-configurable fluid circuits by PDMS elastomer micromachining. in Twelfth IEEE International Conference on Micro Electrical Mechanical Systems. (1999)Google Scholar
  11. K. Miller, How to test very soft biological tissues in extension? J Biomech 34(5), 651–7 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. J.L. Tan, J. Tien, D.M. Pirone, D.S. Gray, K. Bhadriraju, C.S. Chen, Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(4), 1484–9 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Khoo, C. Liu, Micro magnetic silicone elastomer membrane actuator. Sensors and Actuators 89, 259–266 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Kretschmer, R. Drake, M. Neidhoefer, M. Wilhelm, Quantification of composition and domain sizes of industrial poly(phthalamide)/poly(dimethylsiloxane) block copolymers using different 1H solid state NMR methods. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 22(2–3), 204–17 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Sadler, T. Liakopoulos, J. Cropp, C. Ahn, T. Henderson, Protopye microvalve using a new magnetic microactuator. SPIE Conference on Microfluidic Devices and Systems 3515, 3515–03 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. N.J. Sniadecki, A. Anguelouch, M.T. Yang, C.M. Lamb, Z. Liu, S.B. Kirschner, Y. Liu, D.H. Reich, C.S. Chen, Magnetic microposts as an approach to apply forces to living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(37), 14553–8 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. K&J Magnetics, I. Neodymium Magnet Physical Properties. Available from: 2007
  18. J. Gere, Mechanics of Materials. Sixth Edition ed. Brooks/Cole. 599. (2004)Google Scholar
  19. A.E. Brown, Rationale and summary of methods for determining ultrasonic properties of materials at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. (1995)Google Scholar
  20. X. Wang, M. Tillack, S.S. Harilal, 2-D Magnetic circuit analysis for a permanent magnet used in laser ablation plume expansion experiments (University of California, La Jolla, 2003)Google Scholar
  21. ANSYS, I., Theory Reference. Canonsburg: ANSYS, Inc. (2006)Google Scholar
  22. D. Askeland, The Science and Engineering of Materials. Fourth Edition ed. Thomas-Engineering. (2002)Google Scholar
  23. C.A. Lemmon, N.J. Sniadecki, S.A. Ruiz, J.L. Tan, L.H. Romer, C.S. Chen, Shear force at the cell-matrix interface: enhanced analysis for microfabricated post array detectors. Mech Chem Biosyst 2(1), 1–16 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. R. Serway, R. Beichner, J.W. Jewett, Physics for Scientists, 5th edn. (Saunders College Publishing, Orlando, 2000)Google Scholar
  25. J.H. Ashton, J.P. Vande Geest, B.R. Simon, D.G. Haskett, Compressive mechanical properties of the intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms and fibrin-based thrombus mimics. J Biomech 42(3), 197–201 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Keyes
    • 2
  • Michael Junkin
    • 1
  • Pak Kin Wong
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jonathan P. Vande Geest
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Aerospace and Mechanical EngineeringThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Biomedical EngineeringThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.BIO5 Institute for Biocollaborative ResearchThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations