Biomedical Microdevices

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 1213–1221 | Cite as

Development of a novel intra-vaginal transducer with improved dynamic response

  • Paul J. Johnson
  • Evan M. Rosenbluth
  • Ingrid E. Nygaard
  • Monir K. Parikh
  • Robert W. Hitchcock


Limitations of standard clinical pressure transducers have hampered our ability to provide reliable measurements of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during physical activities. To overcome these limitations, a novel intravaginal transducer (IVT) capable of accurate, reliable, and continuous IAP measurements during normal activity was developed. The design was validated through comparison with standard clinical pressure transducers in both bench top and clinical tests. The IVT demonstrated an improved dynamic response when compared to a standard rectal balloon catheter. Additionally, the radially symmetric design allows for accurate measurement within non-fluid-filled tissue cavities and simple placement within the vaginal canal. This is an advantage over sensor-tipped transducers which are only reliable in fluid-filled compartments. The IVT design presented here is preliminary to a wireless version that will allow for IAP measurement during activities outside the clinic.


Pressure transducer Pressure sensor Intra-abdominal pressure Vaginal transducer Frequency response Dynamic response Physical activity 



intra-abdominal pressure


intravaginal transducer


  1. R.S. Anderson, A.M. Shepherd, R.C. Feneley, J Urol 130, 727 (1983)Google Scholar
  2. Blood pressure transducers, American National Standard, ANSI/AAMI BP22:1994/(R)2001/(R)2006, Revision/combination of ANSI/AAMI BP22:1986 & ANSI/AAMI BP23:1986 Blood pressure transducers, Developed by Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Approved 30 August 1994 by American National Standards Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. G.A. Barbalias, Urol 21, 331 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. M.L. Cheatham, K. Safcsak, J Am Coll Surgeons 186, 594 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. P.J. Culligan, R.P. Goldberg, D.W. Blackhurst, K. Sasso, S. Koduri, P.K. Sand, Obstet Gynecol 98, 253 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. A. DeHennis, K. Wise, J MEMS 14, 12 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. M.J. Donnelly, S. Powell-Morgan, A.L. Olsen, I.E. Nygaard, Int Urogynecol J 15, 302 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. J.C. Fang, K. Hilden, A.K. Tuteja, K.A. Peterson, Digest Dis Sci 49, 1657 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. M.A. Fonseca, J. Kroh, J. White, M.G. Allen (Tech. Dig. Solid-State Sensor, Actuator, and Microsystems Workshop, Hilton Head, 2006)Google Scholar
  10. N.M. Guaderrama, C.W. Nager, J. Liu, D.H. Pretorius, R.K. Mittal, Neurourol Urodynam 24, 243 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. P.E. Holt, C. Gibbs, C.M. Wathes, Neurourol Urodynam 9, 281 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. A.F. Hundley, M.B. Brown, L. Brubaker, G.W. Cundiff, K. Kreder, P. Lotze, H.E. Richter, H. Zyczynski, A.M. Weber, A.G. Visco, Int Urogynecol J 17, 400 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Hunziker, Can J Anaesth 34, 409 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. T.J. Iberti, K.M. Kelly, D.R. Gentili, S. Hirsch, E. Benjamin, Crit Care Med 15, 1140 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. I.L. Kron, P.K. Harman, S.P. Nolan, Ann Surg 199, 28 (1984)Google Scholar
  16. G. Lose, D. Griffiths, G. Hosker, S. Kulseng-Hanssen, D. Perucchini, W. Schäfer, P. Thind, E. Versi, Neurourol Urodynam 21, 258 (2002). doi:10.1002/Nau.10051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Malbrain, Intens Care Med 30, 357 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. T.A. Mccarthy, Urol 20, 657 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Murray, Antepartal And Intrapartal Fetal Monitoring, 2nd edn. (Learning Resources International, 1997)Google Scholar
  20. F. Obeid, A. Saba, J. Fath, B. Guslits, R. Chung, V. Sorensen, J. Buck, M. Horst, Arch Surg-Chicago 130, 544 (1995)Google Scholar
  21. K. Oddsson, B. Leifels-Fischer, N.R. De Melo, D. Wiel-Masson, C. Benedetto, C.H.J. Verhoeven, T.O.M. Dieben, Contraception 71, 176 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Ohki, D. Stern, M. Allen, J. Yadav, Endovasc Today 3, 47 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. R. Stefini, F.A. Rasulo, Eur J Anaesth 25, 192 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. M.R. Stoker, Anaesth Intens Care Med 5, 371 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. L.F. Weir, I.E. Nygaard, J. Wilken, D. Brandt, K.F. Janz, Obstet Gynecol 107, 305 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. P. Zehnder, B. Roth, F.C. Burkhard, T.M. Kessler, J Urol 180, 1013 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. Johnson
    • 1
  • Evan M. Rosenbluth
    • 2
  • Ingrid E. Nygaard
    • 2
  • Monir K. Parikh
    • 3
  • Robert W. Hitchcock
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt LakeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt LakeUSA
  3. 3.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of UtahSalt LakeUSA

Personalised recommendations