BIT Numerical Mathematics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 99–127 | Cite as

Reduced relative entropy techniques for a priori analysis of multiphase problems in elastodynamics

  • Jan Giesselmann
  • Tristan PryerEmail author


We give an a priori analysis of a semi-discrete discontinuous Galerkin scheme approximating solutions to a model of multiphase elastodynamics which involves an energy density depending not only on the strain but also the strain gradient. A key component in the analysis is the reduced relative entropy stability framework developed in Giesselmann (SIAM J Math Anal 46(5):3518–3539, 2014). The estimate we derive is optimal in the \(\hbox {L} _{\infty }(0,T;dG)\) norm for the strain and the \(\hbox {L} _{2}(0,T;dG)\) norm for the velocity, where dG is an appropriate mesh dependent \(\hbox {H} ^{1}\)-like space.


Discontinuous Galerkin finite element method A priori error analysis Multiphase elastodynamics Relative entropy  Reduced relative entropy 

Mathematics Subject Classification

65M60 65M12 65M15 74B20 


  1. 1.
    Abeyaratne, R., Knowles, J.K.: Kinetic relations and the propagation of phase boundaries in solids. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 114(2), 119–154 (1991). doi: 10.1007/BF00375400 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews, G., Ball, J.M.: Asymptotic behaviour and changes of phase in one-dimensional nonlinear viscoelasticity. J. Differ. Equ. 44(2), 306–341 (1982). doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(82)90019-5. Special issue dedicated to J. P. LaSalle
  3. 3.
    Arfken, G., Weber, H.: Mathematical Methods For Physicists International Student Edition. Elsevier Science (2005).
  4. 4.
    Braack, M., Prohl, A.: Stable discretization of a diffuse interface model for liquid-vapor flows with surface tension. ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 47, 401–420 (2013). doi: 10.1051/m2an/2012032.
  5. 5.
    Chalons, C., LeFloch, P.G.: High-order entropy-conservative schemes and kinetic relations for van der Waals fluids. J. Comput. Phys. 168(1), 184–206 (2001). doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6690 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Z., Chen, H.: Pointwise error estimates of discontinuous galerkin methods with penalty for second-order elliptic problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 42(3), 1146–1166 (2005).
  7. 7.
    Ciarlet, P.G.: The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, vol. 4. Studies in Mathematics and its Applications. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1978)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dafermos, C.M.: The second law of thermodynamics and stability. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 70(2), 167–179 (1979). doi: 10.1007/BF00250353 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dafermos, C.M.: Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 325, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04048-1
  10. 10.
    Di Pietro, D.A., Ern, A.: Mathematical Aspects of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods. Mathématiques & Applications (Berlin) [Mathematics & Applications], vol. 69. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22980-0
  11. 11.
    Diehl, D.: Higher order schemes for simulation of compressible liquid-vapor flows with phase change. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Freiburg (2007).
  12. 12.
    DiPerna, R.J.: Uniqueness of solutions to hyperbolic conservation laws. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 28(1), 137–188 (1979). doi: 10.1512/iumj.1979.28.28011 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engel, P., Viorel, A., Rohde, C.: A low-order approximation for viscous-capillary phase transition dynamics. Port. Math. 70(4), 319–344 (2014). doi: 10.4171/PM/1937 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evans, L.C.: Partial Differential Equations, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 19. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Georgoulis, E.H., Lakkis, O., Virtanen, J.M.: A posteriori error control for discontinuous Galerkin methods for parabolic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49(2), 427–458 (2011). doi: 10.1137/080722461 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giesselmann, J.: A relative entropy approach to convergence of a low order approximation to a nonlinear elasticity model with viscosity and capillarity. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46(5), 3518–3539 (2014). doi: 10.1137/140951710 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giesselmann, J., Makridakis, C., Pryer, T.: Energy consistent discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system. Math. Comput. 83(289), 2071–2099 (2014). doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-2014-02792-0 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giesselmann, J., Pryer, T.: Reduced relative entropy techniques for aposteriori analysis of multiphase problems in elastodynamics. Submitted–tech report available on ArXiV (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hayes, B.T., Lefloch, P.G.: Nonclassical shocks and kinetic relations: strictly hyperbolic systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal 31(5), 941–991 (2000). doi: 10.1137/S0036141097319826 (electronic)
  20. 20.
    Jamet, D., Torres, D., Brackbill, J.: On the theory and computation of surface tension: the elimination of parasitic currents through energy conservation in the second-gradient method. J. Comput. Phys 182, 262–276 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karakashian, O., Makridakis, C.: Convergence of a continuous Galerkin method with mesh modification for nonlinear wave equations. Math. Comput. 74(249), 85–102 (2005). doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01654-0 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    LeFloch, P.G.: Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (2002). doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8150-0. The theory of classical and nonclassical shock waves
  23. 23.
    LeFloch, P.G., Thanh, M.D.: Non-classical Riemann solvers and kinetic relations. II. An hyperbolic-elliptic model of phase-transition dynamics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 132(1), 181–219 (2002). doi: 10.1017/S030821050000158X
  24. 24.
    Makridakis, C.G.: Finite element approximations of nonlinear elastic waves. Math. Comput. 61(204), 569–594 (1993). doi: 10.2307/2153241 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ortner, C., Süli, E.: Discontinuous Galerkin finite element approximation of nonlinear second-order elliptic and hyperbolic systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45(4), 1370–1397 (2007). doi: 10.1137/06067119X MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pavel, N.H.: Nonlinear Evolution Operators and Semigroups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1260. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1987)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slemrod, M.: Admissibility criteria for propagating phase boundaries in a van der Waals fluid. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 81(4), 301–315 (1983). doi: 10.1007/BF00250857 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slemrod, M.: Dynamic phase transitions in a van der Waals fluid. J. Differ. Equ. 52(1), 1–23 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(84)90130-X MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tian, L., Xu, Y., Kuerten, J.G.M., Van der Vegt, J.J.W.: A local discontinuous galerkin method for the propagation of phase transition in solids and fluids. J. Sci. Comp. 59(3), 688–720 (2014). doi: 10.1007/s10915-013-9778-9 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Applied Analysis and Numerical SimulationUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsWhiteknightsReadingEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations