Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient algorithm for simultaneous reduction to the \(m\)-Hessenberg-triangular-triangular form

  • Published:
BIT Numerical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an efficient algorithm for simultaneous reduction of three matrices by using orthogonal transformations, where \(A\) is reduced to \(m\)-Hessenberg form, and \(B\) and \(E\) to triangular form. The algorithm is a blocked version of the algorithm described by Miminis and Paige (Int J Control 35:341–354, 1982). The \(m\)-Hessenberg-triangular–triangular form of matrices \(A\), \(B\) and \(E\) is specially suitable for solving multiple shifted systems \((\sigma E-A)X=B\). Such shifted systems naturally occur in control theory when evaluating the transfer function of a descriptor system, or in interpolatory model reduction methods. They also arise as a result of discretizing the time-harmonic wave equation in heterogeneous media, or originate from structural dynamics engineering problems. The proposed blocked algorithm for the \(m\)-Hessenberg-triangular-triangular reduction is based on aggregated Givens rotations, and is a generalization of the blocked algorithm for the Hessenberg-triangular reduction proposed by Kågström et al. (BIT 48:563–584, 2008). Numerical tests confirm that the blocked algorithm is much faster than its non-blocked version based on regular Givens rotations only. As an illustration of its efficiency, two applications of the \(m\)-Hessenberg-triangular-triangular reduction from control theory are described: evaluation of the transfer function of a descriptor system at many complex values, and computation of the staircase form used to identify the controllable part of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahuja, K., De Sturler, E., Gugercin, S., Chang, E.R.: Recycling BiCG with an application to model reduction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34, A1925–A1949 (2012)

  2. Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., Blackford, S., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J.J., Du Croz, J., Greenbaum, A., Hammarling, S.J., McKenney, A., Sorensen, D.C.: LAPACK Users’ Guide, 3rd edn. SIAM, Philadelphia (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Beattie, C.A., Drmač, Z., Gugercin, S.: A note on shifted Hessenberg systems and frequency response computation. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 38, 12:1–12:16 (2011)

  4. Bosner, N., Bujanović, Z., Drmač, Z.: Efficient generalized Hessenberg form and applications. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 39, 19:1–19:19 (2013)

  5. Chu, K.-W.E.: A controllability condensed form and a state feedback pole assignment algorithm for descriptor systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 33, 366–370 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dackland, K., Kågström, B.: Blocked algorithms and software for reduction of a regular matrix pair to generalized Schur form. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 25, 425–454 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dongarra, J.J., Du Croz, J., Duff, I., Hammarling, S.: A set of Level 3 basic linear algebra subprograms. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 16, 1–17 (1990)

  8. Golub, G.H., van Loan, C.F.: Matrix Computations, 3rd edn. M. D. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gugercin, S., Antoulas, A.C., Beattie, C.A.: H2 model reduction for large-scale linear dynamical systems. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30, 609–638 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Higham, N.J.: Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms, 2nd edn. SIAM, Philadelphia (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kågström, B., Kressner, D., Quintana-Ortí, E.S., Quintana-Ortí, G.: Blocked algorithms for the reduction to Hessenberg-triangular form revisited. BIT 48, 563–584 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Karlsson, L., Kågström, B.: Parallel two-stage reduction to Hessenberg form using dynamic scheduling on shared-memory architectures. Parallel Comput. 37, 771–782 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang, B.: Using level 3 BLAS in rotation-based algorithms. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19, 626–634 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Laub, A.J., Linnemann, A.: Hessenberg and Hessenberg/triangular forms in linear system theory. Int. J. Control 44, 1523–1547 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Miminis, G.S.: Deflation in eigenvalue assignment of descriptor systems using state feedback. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 38, 1322–1336 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Miminis, G.S., Paige, C.C.: An algorithm for pole assignment of time invariant linear systems. Int. J. Control 35, 341–354 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Miminis, G.S., Paige, C.C.: An algorithm for pole assignment of time invariant multi-input linear systems. In: Proceedings 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 62–67 (1982)

  18. Paige, C.C.: Properties of numerical algorithms related to computing controllability. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 26, 130–138 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Parallelism in the Intel\(\textregistered {}\) Math Kernel Library. http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/parallelism-in-the-intel-math-kernel-library

  20. Simoncini, V.: Restarted full orthogonalization method for shifted linear systems. BIT 43, 459–466 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Simoncini, V., Perotti, F.: On the numerical solution of \((\lambda ^{2}A+\lambda B+C)x=b\) and application to structural dynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 1875–1897 (2002)

  22. SLICOT. http://www.slicot.org

  23. van Dooren, P.M., Verhaegen, M.: On the use of unitary state-space transformations, Linear algebra and its role in systems theory, Proc. AMS-IMS-SIAM Conf., Brunswick/Maine 1984. Contemp. Math. 47, 447–463 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Gijzen, M.B., Erlangga, Y.A., Vuik, C.: Spectral analysis of the discrete Helmholtz operator preconditioned with a shifted Laplacian. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29, 1942–1958 (2007)

  25. Van Zee, F.G., van de Geijn, R.A., Quintana-Orti, G.: Restructuring the tridiagonal and bidiagonal QR algorithms for performance. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 40, 18:1–18:34 (2014)

  26. Varga, A.: Numerical algorithms and software tools for analysis and modelling of descriptor systems. Prepr. of 2nd IFAC Workshop on System Structure and Control, Prague, pp. 392–395 (1992)

  27. Varga, A.: Computation of irreducible generalized state-space realizations. Kybernetika 26, 89–106 (1990)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Varga, A., Van Dooren, P.M.: Task I.A—basic software tools for standard and generalized state-space systems and transfer matrix factorizations, SLICOT Working Note 17 (1999)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the referees for giving many helpful suggestions, which inspired the development of the double-blocked algorithm for the \(m\)-Hessenberg-triangular-triangular reduction, and helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nela Bosner.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel Kressner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bosner, N. Efficient algorithm for simultaneous reduction to the \(m\)-Hessenberg-triangular-triangular form. Bit Numer Math 55, 677–703 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-014-0516-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-014-0516-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation