BIT Numerical Mathematics

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 531–558 | Cite as

Stiffness 1952–2012: Sixty years in search of a definition



Although stiff differential equations is a mature area of research in scientific computing, a rigorous and computationally relevant characterization of stiffness is still missing. In this paper, we present a critical review of the historical development of the notion of stiffness, before introducing a new approach. A functional, called the stiffness indicator, is defined terms of the logarithmic norms of the differential equation’s vector field. Readily computable along a solution to the problem, the stiffness indicator is independent of numerical integration methods, as well as of operational criteria such as accuracy requirements. The stiffness indicator defines a local reference time scale\(\Delta t\), which may vary with time and state along the solution. By comparing \(\Delta t\) to the range of integration \(T\), a large stiffness factor\(T/\Delta t\) is a necessary condition for stiffness. In numerical computations, \(\Delta t\) can be compared to the actual step size \(h\), whose stiffness factor \(h/\Delta t\) depends on the choice of integration method. Thus \(\Delta t\) embodies the mathematical aspects of stiffness, while \(h\) accounts for its numerical and operational aspects.To demonstrate the theory, a number of highly nonlinear test problems are solved. We show, inter alia, that the stiffness indicator is able to distinguish the complex and rapidly changing behavior at (locally unstable) turning points, such as those observed in the van der Pol and Oregonator equations. The new characterization is mathematically rigorous, and in full agreement with observations in practical computations.


Initial value problems Stability Logarithmic norms Stiffness Stiffness indicator Stiffness factor  Reference time scale Step size 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

65L04 65L05 


  1. 1.
    Artemiev, S., Averina, T.: Numerical Analysis of Systems of Ordinary and Stochastic Differential Equations. VSP, Utrecht (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brugnano, L., Mazzia, F., Trigiante, D.: Fifty years of stiffness. In: Simos, T.E. (ed.) Recent Advances in Computational and Applied Mathematics, pp. 1–21. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Byrne, G.D., Hindmarsh, A.C.: Stiff ODE solvers: a review of current and coming attractions. J. Comp. Phys. 70, 1–62 (1987)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cash, J.R.: Efficient numerical methods for the solution of stiff initial-value problems and differential-algebraic equations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459, 797–815 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curtiss, C.F., Hirschfelder, J.O.: Integration of stiff equations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 38, 235–243 (1952)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahlquist, G.: Stability and error bounds in the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. Almqvist & Wiksells, Uppsala (1959)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahlquist, G.: A numerical method for some ordinary differential equations with large Lipschitz constants. In: Morrell, A.J.H. (ed.) Proceedings of IFIP Congress. Information Processing 68, Edinburgh, UK, vol. 1, Mathematics, Software, pp. 183–186 (1968)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dekker, K., Verwer, J.G.: Stability of Runge-Kutta methods for stiff nonlinear differential equations. CWI Monographs, vol. 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1984)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ekeland, K., Owren, B., Øines, E.: Stiffness detection and estimation of dominant spectrum with explicit Runge-Kutta methods. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 24, 368–382 (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gear, C.W.: Numerical initial value problems in ordinary differential equations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hairer, E.; Wanner, G.: Solving ordinary differential equations II. Stiff and differential-algebraic problems, second revised edition. Comput. Math., vol. 14. Springer, Berlin (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higham, D.J., Trefethen, L.N.: Stiffness of ODEs. BIT 33, 285–303 (1993)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lambert, J.D.: Computational Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations. Wiley, London (1973)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mazzia, F., Magherini, C.: Test Set for Initial Value Problem Solvers, Release 2.4 (2008).
  15. 15.
    Prothero, A., Robinson, A.: On the stability and accuracy of one-step methods for solving stiff systems of ordinary differential equations. Math. Comp. 28, 145–162 (1974)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shampine, L.: Evaluation of a test set for stiff ODE solvers. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 7, 409–420 (1981)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shampine, L.: What is stiffness? In: Aiken, R.C. (ed.) Stiff Computation. Oxford University Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spijker, M.N.: Stiffness in numerical initial-value problems. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 72, 393–406 (1996)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Söderlind, G.: Digital filters in adaptive time-stepping. ACM-TOMS 29, 1–26 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Söderlind, G.: The logarithmic norm. History and modern theory. BIT 46, 631–652 (2006)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Departamento de Matemática AplicadaPza. San Francisco s/n, Universidad de ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations